Suppr超能文献

产超广谱β-内酰胺酶大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌患者危险因素特征的差异:一项多中心病例对照比较研究。

Differences in risk-factor profiles between patients with ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: a multicentre case-case comparison study.

作者信息

Freeman Joshua T, Rubin Joseph, McAuliffe Gary N, Peirano Gisele, Roberts Sally A, Drinković Dragana, Pitout Johann Dd

机构信息

Department of Clinical Microbiology, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand ; Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Division of Microbiology, Calgary Laboratory Services, Departments of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology Immunology and Infectious Diseases, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2014 Sep 1;3:27. doi: 10.1186/2047-2994-3-27. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Generic epidemiological differences between extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-KP), are poorly defined. Nonetheless, defining such differences and understanding their basis could have strategic implications for infection control policy and practice.

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2011 patients with bacteraemia due to ESBL-EC or ESBL-KP across all three acute hospitals in the city of Auckland, New Zealand, were eligible for inclusion. Recognised risk factors for ESBL bacteraemia were compared between species in a retrospective case-case study design using multivariate logistic regression. Representative isolates underwent ESBL gene characterisation and molecular typing.

RESULTS

170 patients and 176 isolates were included in the study (92 patients with ESBL-EC, 78 with ESBL-KP). 92.6% had CTX-Ms. 39% of EC were ST131 while 51% of KP belonged to 3 different STs (i.e. ST20, ST48 & ST1087). Specific sequence types were associated with specific hospitals for ESBL-KP but not ESBL-EC. Variables positively associated with ESBL-EC on multivariate analysis were: community acquired infection (odds ratio [OR] 7.9; 95% CI: 2.6-23.9); chronic pulmonary disease (OR 5.5; 95% CI: 1.5-20.1); and high prevalence country of origin (OR 4.3; 95% CI: 1.6-11.6). Variables negatively associated with ESBL-EC were previous transplant (OR 0.06; 95% CI: 0.007-0.6); Hospital 2 (OR 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1-0.7) and recent ICU admission (OR 0.3; 95% CI: 0.07-0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in risk profiles between patients with ESBL-EC and ESBL-KP suggest fundamental differences in transmission dynamics. Understanding the biological basis for these differences could have implications for infection control practice. Tailoring of infection control measures according to ESBL species may be indicated in some instances.

摘要

背景

产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)的大肠埃希菌(ESBL-EC)和肺炎克雷伯菌(ESBL-KP)之间一般的流行病学差异定义尚不明确。然而,明确这些差异并理解其基础可能对感染控制政策和实践具有战略意义。

方法

2009年至2011年期间,新西兰奥克兰市所有三家急性医院中因ESBL-EC或ESBL-KP导致菌血症的患者符合纳入标准。在一项回顾性病例对照研究设计中,使用多变量逻辑回归比较了不同菌种之间公认的ESBL菌血症危险因素。对代表性分离株进行了ESBL基因特征分析和分子分型。

结果

该研究纳入了170例患者和176株分离株(92例ESBL-EC患者,78例ESBL-KP患者)。92.6%的分离株具有CTX-M型。39%的大肠埃希菌为ST131型,而51%的肺炎克雷伯菌属于3种不同的序列型(即ST20、ST48和ST1087)。特定的序列型与ESBL-KP的特定医院相关,但与ESBL-EC无关。多变量分析中与ESBL-EC呈正相关的变量有:社区获得性感染(比值比[OR]7.9;95%置信区间:2.6 - 23.9);慢性肺病(OR 5.5;95%置信区间:1.5 - 20.1);以及高流行率的原籍国(OR 4.3;95%置信区间:1.6 - 11.6)。与ESBL-EC呈负相关的变量有既往移植史(OR 0.06;95%置信区间:0.007 - 0.6);医院2(OR 0.3;95%置信区间:0.1 - 0.7)和近期入住重症监护病房(OR 0.3;95%置信区间:0.07 - 0.9)。

结论

ESBL-EC和ESBL-KP患者风险特征的差异表明传播动态存在根本差异。了解这些差异的生物学基础可能对感染控制实践有影响。在某些情况下,可能需要根据ESBL菌种调整感染控制措施。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Clinical Observation and Prognostic Analysis of Patients With Bloodstream Infection.血流感染患者的临床观察与预后分析。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020 Nov 9;10:577244. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.577244. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验