• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在吸收后的上颌后牙区使用6毫米种植体或11毫米种植体联合上颌窦底提升术支持的单冠修复:一项为期1年的随机对照试验。

Single crowns in the resorbed posterior maxilla supported by either 6-mm implants or by 11-mm implants combined with sinus floor elevation surgery: a 1-year randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Guljé Felix L, Raghoebar Gerry M, Vissink Arjan, Meijer Henny J A

出版信息

Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014 Autumn;7(3):247-55.

PMID:25237669
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this randomised controlled trial was to assess the clinical performance of single crowns in the posterior maxilla supported by either 6-mm or 11-mm implants combined with maxillary sinus floor elevation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

41 consecutive patients with one missing premolar or molar in the posterior maxilla and with an estimated bone height of 6 to 8 mm in that area were included. Each patient was randomly allocated to one of the two treatment groups, namely to receive an 11-mm implant (Osseo Speed 4.0 S, Dentsply Implants, Mölndal, Sweden) in combination with maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery or to receive a 6-mm implant (Osseo Speed 4.0 S) without any grafting. After a 3-month osseointegration period, all implants were restored with custom-made titanium abutments and cemented zirconia-based porcelain crowns. Outcome measures were: implant survival; radiographic bone changes; plaque accumulation; bleeding tendency; peri-implant inflammation; presence of dental calculus; biological and technical complications; and patients' satisfaction. Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed at placement of the crown and 12 months thereafter. Patients' satisfaction was scored before treatment and after 12 months of functioning of the crown.

RESULTS

One patient of the 11 mm implant group died during the follow-up. No implant failed and no biological or technical complications occurred. From loading to the 12 months follow-up, no difference was found in mean marginal bone changes between the groups (bone resorption in both groups 0.1 ± 0.3 mm). Clinical items revealed very healthy peri-implant soft tissues in both groups. Patients' satisfaction scores were high in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

6-mm implants and 11-mm implants combined with sinus floor elevation surgery are equally successful to support a single crown in the resorbed posterior maxilla after 1-year follow-up.

摘要

目的

本随机对照试验的目的是评估在上颌后牙区使用6毫米或11毫米种植体并结合上颌窦底提升术支持的单冠的临床性能。

材料与方法

纳入41例上颌后牙区有一颗前磨牙或磨牙缺失且该区域估计骨高度为6至8毫米的连续患者。每位患者被随机分配到两个治疗组之一,即接受11毫米种植体(Osseo Speed 4.0 S,登士柏种植体公司,瑞典莫恩达尔)并结合上颌窦底提升手术,或接受6毫米种植体(Osseo Speed 4.0 S)且不进行任何植骨。在3个月的骨结合期后,所有种植体均用定制的钛基台和粘结的氧化锆基瓷冠进行修复。观察指标包括:种植体存留率;影像学骨变化;菌斑堆积;出血倾向;种植体周围炎症;牙结石的存在;生物学和技术并发症;以及患者满意度。在冠修复时及之后12个月进行临床和影像学检查。在治疗前和冠功能运行12个月后对患者满意度进行评分。

结果

11毫米种植体组有1例患者在随访期间死亡。没有种植体失败,也没有发生生物学或技术并发症。从加载到12个月随访,两组之间的平均边缘骨变化没有差异(两组骨吸收均为0.1±0.3毫米)。临床项目显示两组种植体周围软组织均非常健康。两组患者的满意度评分都很高。

结论

经过1年随访,6毫米种植体和11毫米种植体结合窦底提升手术在支持上颌后牙区吸收后的单冠方面同样成功。

相似文献

1
Single crowns in the resorbed posterior maxilla supported by either 6-mm implants or by 11-mm implants combined with sinus floor elevation surgery: a 1-year randomised controlled trial.在吸收后的上颌后牙区使用6毫米种植体或11毫米种植体联合上颌窦底提升术支持的单冠修复:一项为期1年的随机对照试验。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014 Autumn;7(3):247-55.
2
Single crowns in the resorbed posterior maxilla supported by either 11-mm implants combined with sinus floor elevation or 6-mm implants:A 5-year randomised controlled trial.上颌窦底提升联合 11mm 种植体或单纯 6mm 种植体支持的上颌后牙区单个牙缺失修复:一项为期 5 年的随机对照研究。
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2019;12(3):315-326.
3
Short (5 and 7 mm long) porous implants in the posterior atrophic maxilla: a 5-year report of a prospective single-cohort study.后牙区萎缩上颌骨的短型(5毫米和7毫米长)多孔种植体:一项前瞻性单队列研究的5年报告
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012 Autumn;5(3):265-72.
4
Cemented CeraOne and porcelain fused to TiAdapt abutment single-implant crown restorations: a 10-year comparative follow-up study.金瓷冠修复Ceramage One 与钛基底 TiAdapt 基台单颗种植体的十年临床随访研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009 Dec;11(4):303-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00120.x. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
5
Zirconia abutments for single-tooth implant restorations: a retrospective and clinical follow-up study.氧化锆基台用于单颗牙种植修复:回顾性临床随访研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Nov;22(11):1308-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02114.x. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
6
Do repeated changes of abutments have any influence on the stability of peri-implant tissues? Four-month post-loading preliminary results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.种植体基台的反复更换对种植体周围组织的稳定性有影响吗?一项多中心随机对照试验的4个月加载后初步结果。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2015 Summer;8(2):129-40.
7
Titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter versus titanium regular-diameter implants for anterior and premolar single crowns: 1-year results of a randomized controlled clinical study.钛锆窄径与钛常规径种植体在前牙及前磨牙单冠修复中的应用:一项随机对照临床研究的 1 年结果。
J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Nov;40(11):1052-61. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12156. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
8
Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 x 5 mm implants with a novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year results from a randomised controlled trial.采用新型含纳米结构钙钛表面的5×5毫米种植体或在增量骨中使用更长种植体支持的假体修复后牙萎缩颌骨。一项随机对照试验的一年结果。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2013 Winter;6(4):343-57.
9
Do repeated changes of abutments have any influence on the stability of peri-implant tissues? One-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.种植体基台的反复更换对种植体周围组织的稳定性有影响吗?一项多中心随机对照试验的一年加载后结果。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10(1):57-72.
10
Clinical outcomes of single implant supported crowns utilising the titanium base abutment: A 7.5-year prospective cohort study.采用钛基基台的单颗种植体支持冠的临床效果:一项为期 7.5 年的前瞻性队列研究。
J Dent. 2024 Oct;149:105306. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105306. Epub 2024 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-Term Outcomes of Short versus Long Dental Implants with Sinus Lift in Atrophied Posterior Maxillae: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.萎缩性上颌后牙区短种植体与长种植体联合上颌窦提升术的长期疗效:一项系统评价与Meta分析
P R Health Sci J. 2025 Mar;44(1):54-62.
2
Metal-Free Custom-Made Zirconia Implants-A Prospective 5-Year Follow-Up Single-Arm Clinical Trial.无金属定制氧化锆种植体——一项为期5年的前瞻性单臂临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Feb;27(1):e13404. doi: 10.1111/cid.13404. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
3
Comparative evaluation of hard and soft tissue parameters by using short implants and standard long implants with sinus lift for prosthetic rehabilitation of posterior maxilla.
使用短种植体和标准长种植体联合上颌窦提升术对后牙区上颌骨进行修复重建时,对软硬组织参数的比较评估。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2024 Jan-Feb;28(1):106-112. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_436_23. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
4
Multicentre Prospective Study Analysing Relevant Factors Related to Marginal Bone Loss: A Two-Year Evolution.多中心前瞻性研究分析与边缘骨丢失相关的相关因素:两年进展情况
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Jul 31;11(8):185. doi: 10.3390/dj11080185.
5
Short versus standard implants at sinus augmented sites: a systematic review and meta-analysis.短种植体与标准种植体在窦腔提升部位的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Nov;26(11):6681-6698. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04628-1. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
6
The use of corticosteroids in the lateral sinus augmentation surgical procedure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.外侧窦提升术中皮质类固醇的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022 Dec;24(6):776-791. doi: 10.1111/cid.13126. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
7
Short Implants versus Longer Implants with Sinus Floor Elevation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with a Post-Loading Follow-Up Duration of 5 Years.短种植体与行上颌窦底提升的长种植体对比:一项对加载后随访期为5年的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jul 5;15(13):4722. doi: 10.3390/ma15134722.
8
Influence of Implant Tilting and Length on the Biomechanics of Single-Tooth Restoration: A Finite Element Analysis in Atrophic Mandible.种植体倾斜和长度对单颗牙修复生物力学的影响:萎缩下颌骨的有限元分析
Dent J (Basel). 2022 May 6;10(5):77. doi: 10.3390/dj10050077.
9
Influence of Dental Implant Diameter and Bone Quality on the Biomechanics of Single-Crown Restoration. A Finite Element Analysis.牙种植体直径和骨质量对单冠修复生物力学的影响。有限元分析。
Dent J (Basel). 2021 Sep 6;9(9):103. doi: 10.3390/dj9090103.
10
Single-crown restorations supported by short implants (6 mm) compared with standard-length implants (13 mm) in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.短种植体(6 毫米)支持的单冠修复与上颌窦底提升联合使用标准长度种植体(13 毫米)的比较:一项随机对照临床试验。
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Jul 16;7(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00348-5.