Suppr超能文献

在经胫骨单束和由外向内单束前交叉韧带重建技术中,使用体内三维计算机断层扫描对股骨隧道几何形状进行比较。

Comparison of femoral tunnel geometry, using in vivo 3-dimensional computed tomography, during transportal and outside-in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques.

作者信息

Park Joon Soo, Park Jung Ho, Wang Joon Ho, Oh Chi Heon, Hwang Myung Hoi, Lee Sang Hee, Kim Jae Gyoon

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sung Kyun Kwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2015 Jan;31(1):83-91. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.07.023. Epub 2014 Sep 18.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the transportal (TP) and outside-in (OI) techniques regarding femoral tunnel position and geometry after anatomic single-bundle (SB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

This study included 51 patients who underwent anatomic SB ACL reconstruction with the TP (n = 21) or OI (n = 30) technique. All patients underwent 3-dimensional computed tomography 3 days after the operation. The femoral tunnel position (quadrant method), femoral graft bending angle, femoral tunnel length, and posterior wall breakage were assessed by immediate postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography with OsiriX imaging software.

RESULTS

The OI technique had a shallower femoral tunnel position (arthroscopic position) than did the TP technique (P = .005). The mean femoral graft bending angle was significantly more acute with the OI technique (101.3° ± 8.2°) than with the TP technique (107.9° ± 10.0°) (P = .02). The mean femoral tunnel length was significantly greater with the OI technique (33.0 ± 3.5 mm) than with the TP technique (29.6 ± 3.9 mm) (P = .003). Posterior wall breakage occurred in 7 cases (33.3%) with the TP technique and 1 case (3.3%) with the OI technique (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

The mean femoral tunnel position was significantly shallower (arthroscopic position) with the OI technique than with the TP technique. The OI technique resulted in a more acute femoral graft bending angle, longer femoral tunnel length, and lower incidence of posterior wall breakage than did the TP technique. These results might be helpful for anatomic SB ACL reconstruction using TP and OI techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

摘要

目的

比较解剖单束前交叉韧带(ACL)重建术后经胫骨(TP)技术与由外向内(OI)技术在股骨隧道位置和形态方面的差异。

方法

本研究纳入51例行解剖单束ACL重建术的患者,其中采用TP技术的有21例,采用OI技术的有30例。所有患者在术后3天接受三维计算机断层扫描。使用OsiriX影像软件通过术后即刻三维计算机断层扫描评估股骨隧道位置(象限法)、股骨移植物弯曲角度、股骨隧道长度及后壁破损情况。

结果

OI技术的股骨隧道位置(关节镜下位置)比TP技术更浅(P = 0.005)。OI技术的平均股骨移植物弯曲角度(101.3°±8.2°)比TP技术(107.9°±10.0°)明显更尖锐(P = 0.02)。OI技术的平均股骨隧道长度(33.0±3.5 mm)比TP技术(29.6±3.9 mm)明显更长(P = 0.003)。TP技术组有7例(33.3%)发生后壁破损,OI技术组有1例(3.3%)发生后壁破损(P = 0.02)。

结论

OI技术的平均股骨隧道位置(关节镜下位置)比TP技术明显更浅。与TP技术相比,OI技术导致股骨移植物弯曲角度更尖锐、股骨隧道长度更长且后壁破损发生率更低。这些结果可能有助于采用TP技术和OI技术进行解剖单束ACL重建。

证据等级

III级,回顾性比较研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验