Humphreys C R, Triano J J, Brandl M J
Spinal Ergonomics and Joint Laboratory, National College Chiropractic, Lombard, IL 60148.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1989 Apr;12(2):71-8.
Twenty-seven male and 12 female healthy volunteers were tested twice with 2-7 days separation. Hoffman (H) reflexes and muscle (M) activation waves were obtained from the posterior tibial nerves bilaterally. Results were compared to those obtained from patients presenting with a complaint of low back and/or leg pain, without compressive neuropathy. M, F, H latencies and H/Mmax ratio were recorded. H/M ratio and latency comparisons were not significantly different in the control group left to right or test to test. For the low back pain group, 10-14 days following the initial evaluation, each subject returned for a follow-up test. During the interim, the patient was followed conservatively using manipulation and home care. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) testing of ratio values demonstrated a difference in overall mean values (p greater than 0.001) for comparisons between the control (mean = 0.367), pretest (mean = 0.695), and posttest (mean = 0.558) values. Sensitivity in discriminating acute low back pain subjects from healthy controls was tested by determining the distance between mean H/M values for the probability curves of each population, with an arbitrary cutoff value of 0.6 as the upper limit normal. Sensitivity distance was 2.29 with a likelihood ratio of 3.04. This suggests that an H/Mmax ratio greater than or equal to 0.6 will correctly identify two of three patients with idiopathic low back pain.
27名男性和12名女性健康志愿者接受了两次测试,间隔时间为2至7天。双侧从胫后神经获取霍夫曼(H)反射和肌肉(M)激活波。将结果与那些主诉有腰和/或腿痛但无压迫性神经病变的患者的结果进行比较。记录M、F、H潜伏期和H/Mmax比值。对照组左右之间或测试之间的H/M比值和潜伏期比较无显著差异。对于腰痛组,在初次评估后的10至14天,每位受试者返回进行随访测试。在此期间,对患者采用手法治疗和家庭护理进行保守治疗。对比值进行方差分析(ANOVA)测试表明,对照组(均值 = 0.367)、测试前(均值 = 0.695)和测试后(均值 = 0.558)值之间的总体均值存在差异(p大于0.001)。通过确定每个群体概率曲线的平均H/M值之间的距离来测试区分急性腰痛受试者与健康对照的敏感性,将任意截止值0.6作为正常上限。敏感性距离为2.29,似然比为3.04。这表明H/Mmax比值大于或等于0.6将正确识别三分之二的特发性腰痛患者。