• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

螺纹钉在复合树脂中的固位

The retention of threaded pins in composite resin.

作者信息

Podshadley A G

机构信息

Department of Reconstructive Dentistry, University of Louisville, School of Dentistry, Ky.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 1989 Feb;61(2):169-73. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90367-3.

DOI:10.1016/0022-3913(89)90367-3
PMID:2523968
Abstract

The force required to remove three threaded retention pins from composite resin and the pin length for optimum retention were determined. TMS Minuta, TMS Minikin, and TMS Minim pins were tested. Composite resin materials used were representative of large particle, small particle, and microfilled type materials. Results demonstrate that the Minim pin of 2 mm length is the optimum pin for use with large- and small-particle composite resin. However, microfilled composite resin requires a 2.25 mm length of the Minim pin for optimum retention. Minuta and Minikin pins are removed with only a small amount of force and should be used only when clinical prudence requires a small pin. When these tiny pins are used, the strongest possible composite resin should be selected.

摘要

测定了从复合树脂中取出三根螺纹固位钉所需的力以及实现最佳固位效果的钉长度。对TMS Minuta、TMS Minikin和TMS Minim钉进行了测试。所使用的复合树脂材料分别代表大颗粒、小颗粒和微填料型材料。结果表明,长度为2毫米的Minim钉是用于大颗粒和小颗粒复合树脂的最佳选择。然而,微填料复合树脂需要2.25毫米长的Minim钉才能实现最佳固位。Minuta和Minikin钉只需很小的力就能取出,只有在临床谨慎需要小尺寸钉时才应使用。当使用这些小尺寸钉时,应选择强度尽可能高的复合树脂。

相似文献

1
The retention of threaded pins in composite resin.螺纹钉在复合树脂中的固位
J Prosthet Dent. 1989 Feb;61(2):169-73. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90367-3.
2
Retention of threaded pins in amalgam.螺纹针在汞合金中的固位
J Prosthet Dent. 1990 Jan;63(1):47-51. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90264-d.
3
Fracture resistance of pin-retained amalgam, composite resin, and alloy-reinforced glass ionomer core materials.针固式汞合金、复合树脂及合金增强玻璃离子核心材料的抗折性。
J Prosthet Dent. 1991 Oct;66(4):463-71. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90506-r.
4
The retention of amalgam and composite resin by a smooth, reverse-tapered pin.光滑的倒锥形钉对汞合金和复合树脂的固位
Oper Dent. 1992 Jul-Aug;17(4):152-5.
5
Retention of composite restorations. A comparison between a threaded pin and a dentine bonding agent.复合树脂修复体的固位。螺纹钉与牙本质粘结剂的比较。
Br Dent J. 1988 Sep 24;165(6):217-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4806563.
6
Fracture resistance of composite and amalgam cores retained by pins coated with new adhesive resins.
J Prosthet Dent. 1992 Jun;67(6):752-60. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90577-w.
7
A comparison of pin-retained amalgam and composite resin cores.
J Prosthet Dent. 1978 May;39(5):512-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(78)80183-8.
8
The use of resin composite pins to improve retention of Class IV resin composite restorations.
Oper Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug;25(4):270-3.
9
Interface strength of incremental placement of visible light-cured composites.可见光固化复合树脂增量填充的界面强度
J Am Dent Assoc. 1985 Jun;110(6):932-4. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1985.0017.
10
A clinical comparison of three anterior restorative resins at 3 years.三种前牙修复树脂3年的临床比较
J Am Dent Assoc. 1986 May;112(5):659-63. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1986.0081.