Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Ulm, Prittwitzstraße 43, 89075 Ulm, Germany.
Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Ulm, Prittwitzstraße 43, 89075 Ulm, Germany.
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Nov;50(17):2905-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.08.015. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
Adjuvant chemotherapy has changed dramatically in the last decades. Anthracycline-/Taxane-based and dose-dense chemotherapy regimens improved survival in node positive breast cancer. This study tries to answer the following questions:
This is a German multi-centre (17 participating hospitals all certified as breast cancer centres) retrospective cohort study. We included patients that received CMF-like (CMF) (n=1308), Anthracycline-based (A) (1046), Anthracycline-Taxane-based (AT) (1110) and dose-dense chemotherapy (DD) (213) into this analysis.
In case of N0 and 1-3 pos LN we did not observe statistically significant differences in overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between CMF/A/AT and (for 1-3 pos LN) DD. In the group of 4-10 pos LN we observe an improvement by the use of AT-based chemotherapy, which cannot further be improved by DD chemotherapy. However in the highest risk group, defined as ⩾11 pos LN, we observed a statistically significant improvement in survival by the use of DD chemotherapy. Also a statistically slightly non-significant trend towards improvement of survival parameters by the use of DD compared to AT chemotherapy could be observed. Only for G3 subtypes we could observe a survival benefit for DD. These results remain consistent after exclusion of non-guideline adherent patients (surgery, radiotherapy and endocrine therapy) in order to reduce the bias of guideline violations in other adjuvant treatment modalities.
DD chemotherapy is associated with improved survival parameters in patients with ⩾11 positive LN.
在过去几十年中,辅助化疗发生了巨大变化。蒽环类药物/紫杉类药物和剂量密集化疗方案改善了淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者的生存。本研究试图回答以下问题:
这是一项德国多中心(17 家参与医院均为乳腺癌中心认证)回顾性队列研究。我们纳入了接受 CMF 样(CMF)(n=1308)、蒽环类药物(A)(1046)、蒽环类药物-紫杉类药物(AT)(1110)和剂量密集化疗(DD)(213)的患者进行本分析。
在 N0 和 1-3 个阳性淋巴结的情况下,我们未观察到 CMF/A/AT 和(对于 1-3 个阳性淋巴结)DD 之间的总生存(OS)和无病生存(DFS)存在统计学显著差异。在 4-10 个阳性淋巴结的组中,我们观察到使用基于 AT 的化疗有改善,但 DD 化疗不能进一步改善。然而,在定义为 ⩾11 个阳性淋巴结的最高风险组中,我们观察到 DD 化疗在生存方面有统计学显著改善。与 AT 化疗相比,DD 化疗在生存参数方面也观察到统计学上略有非显著的改善趋势。只有在 G3 亚型中,我们观察到 DD 化疗有生存获益。排除非指南一致的患者(手术、放疗和内分泌治疗)以减少其他辅助治疗方式中指南违反的偏倚后,这些结果仍然一致。
在 ⩾11 个阳性淋巴结的患者中,DD 化疗与改善的生存参数相关。