• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Fewer and better children: race, class, religion, and birth control reform in America.

作者信息

Wilde Melissa J, Danielsen Sabrina

出版信息

AJS. 2014 May;119(6):1710-60. doi: 10.1086/674007.

DOI:10.1086/674007
PMID:25243273
Abstract

In the early 20th century, contraceptives were illegal and, for many, especially religious groups, taboo. But, in the span of just two years, between 1929 and 1931, many of the United States' most prominent religious groups pronounced contraceptives to be moral and began advocating for the laws restricting them to be repealed. Met with everything from support, to silence, to outright condemnation by other religious groups, these pronouncements and the debates they caused divided the American religious field by an issue of sex and gender for the first time. This article explains why America's religious groups took the positions they did at this crucial moment in history. In doing so, it demonstrates that the politics of sex and gender that divide American religion today is deeply rooted in century-old inequalities of race and class.

摘要

相似文献

1
Fewer and better children: race, class, religion, and birth control reform in America.
AJS. 2014 May;119(6):1710-60. doi: 10.1086/674007.
2
Family planning: cultural and religious perspectives.计划生育:文化与宗教视角
Hum Reprod. 1993 Jun;8(6):969-76. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138176.
3
[Confraternities in late medieval Utrecht at the intersection of religion, work, friendship, and politics].[中世纪晚期乌得勒支的兄弟会:宗教、工作、友谊与政治的交汇点]
Trajecta (Leuven). 1999;8(2):97-119.
4
[In a certain corporation: politicizing social relations in black brotherhoods in Brazilian slave society, 1700-1850].[在某公司:1700 - 1850年巴西奴隶社会黑人兄弟会中的社会关系政治化]
Hist Questoes Debates. 1999;16(30):11-38.
5
Contraception in the prepill era.避孕药出现之前的避孕方法。
Contraception. 1999 Jan;59(1 Suppl):7S-10S. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00130-9.
6
Sex, secularism and religious influence in US politics.美国政治中的性别、世俗主义与宗教影响。
Third World Q. 2010;31(6):1023-39. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2010.502739.
7
Gender, religion and democratic politics in India.印度的性别、宗教与民主政治。
Third World Q. 2010;31(6):939-54. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2010.502726.
8
Contraception: traditional and religious attitudes.避孕:传统观念与宗教态度。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1993 Apr;49(1-2):15-8. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(93)90102-i.
9
Chameleon games: Ranjitsinhji's politics of race and gender.变色龙游戏:兰吉特辛吉的种族与性别政治
J Colon Colon Hist. 2001;2(3):n/a. doi: 10.1353/cch.2001.0049.
10
Religion, politics and gender in the context of nation-state formation: the case of Serbia.宗教、政治和民族国家形成背景下的性别问题:以塞尔维亚为例。
Third World Q. 2010;31(6):955-70. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2010.502728.

引用本文的文献

1
Expertise and the "new science" of eugenics.专业知识与优生学的“新科学”。
Soc Sci Med. 2025 Mar;369:117829. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117829. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
2
Urban public services and fertility intentions of internal migrants in China.中国城市公共服务与流动人口生育意愿
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 28;19(3):e0300345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300345. eCollection 2024.