Laboratory for Anthropology, Institute of Anatomy, School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Faculty of Engineering, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Int Endod J. 2015 Sep;48(9):850-63. doi: 10.1111/iej.12381. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
To determine to which extent cavity preparation and each step of dentine removal in the process of root canal treatment (access cavity preparation and root canal enlargement) both individually and jointly contribute to the weakening of the tooth.
Numerical analysis using finite element method (FEM) of separate and combined influence of two-surface Class II preparation and root canal treatment was undertaken to evaluate the decrease in tooth strength. The influence of the two stages in root canal treatment, access cavity preparation and root canal enlargement, was also analysed separately and jointly. After each of these phases, the crown was restored with composite resin, and the FEA was performed only on restored teeth. To estimate the influence of all these procedures on tooth fracture resistance numerically, a Failure Index based on the maximum principal stress criterion (MPCS) was applied. Compressive and tensile stresses were analysed separately and corresponding Failure Indices were calculated.
A two-surface resin composite restoration weakened the tooth by 23.25%. Nevertheless, the Failure Indices showed that this tooth was not likely to fracture even under high occlusal stress (710N). However, after access cavity preparation, the Failure Indices reached the point where, under high occlusal force that may occur in the posterior area, a tooth fracture occurred. The enlargement of root canals had an additional, but relatively small impact on tooth weakening, making the tooth even more susceptible to fracture. The combined influence of both cavity preparation and root canal enlargement led to weakening of 62.6% under a load of 710N, ultimately causing tooth fracture.
The combined finite element method and the maximum principal stress analysis gave insight into the fracture mechanisms of teeth with two-surface composite restorations followed by root canal preparation. Removal of tooth tissue, despite its subsequent restoration with dental materials, weakened the tooth by changing the stress intensity and distribution through tooth structures. Access cavity preparation had the greatest influence on tooth strength whilst canal enlargement did not contribute to this process substantially.
确定根管治疗过程中窝洞预备和牙本质去除的每一步(开髓洞预备和根管扩大)单独和联合作用对牙齿削弱的程度。
使用有限元法(FEM)对二类备洞和根管治疗的单独和联合影响进行数值分析,以评估牙齿强度的降低。还分别和联合分析根管治疗的两个阶段,即开髓洞预备和根管扩大的影响。在这些阶段中的每一个阶段之后,用复合树脂修复牙冠,并仅对修复后的牙齿进行有限元分析。为了数值估计所有这些程序对牙齿抗断裂能力的影响,应用了基于最大主应力准则(MPCS)的失效指数。分别分析压缩和拉伸应力,并计算相应的失效指数。
二类复合树脂修复削弱了牙齿 23.25%。然而,失效指数表明,即使在高咬合压力(710N)下,这颗牙齿也不太可能断裂。然而,开髓洞预备后,失效指数达到了在可能在后牙区发生的高咬合力下牙齿断裂的临界点。根管扩大对牙齿弱化有额外的,但相对较小的影响,使牙齿更容易断裂。窝洞预备和根管扩大的联合影响导致在 710N 的负荷下牙齿弱化 62.6%,最终导致牙齿断裂。
有限元法和最大主应力分析的联合使用深入了解了二类复合修复后进行根管预备的牙齿断裂机制。尽管用牙科材料进行了后续修复,但牙体组织的去除改变了通过牙齿结构的应力强度和分布,从而削弱了牙齿。开髓洞预备对牙齿强度的影响最大,而根管扩大对此过程没有显著贡献。