Lawman Hannah G, Horn M Lee Van, Wilson Dawn K, Pate Russell R
Center for Obesity Research and Education, Temple University, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, USA.
J Sci Med Sport. 2015 Nov;18(6):667-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
Popular methods for analyzing accelerometer data often use a single physical activity outcome variable such as average-weekly or total physical activity. These approaches limit the types of research questions that can be answered and fail to utilize the detailed, time-specific information available from accelerometers. This study proposes the use of multilevel modeling, which tested intervention effects at specific time periods.
The motivating example was the Active by Choice Today trial. Simulations were used to test whether the application of time-specific hypotheses about when physical activity intervention treatment effects were expected to occur (e.g., after-school hours) increased power to detect effects compared to traditional methods.
Six simulation conditions were tested: (1) no treatment effects (to test the type 1 error rate), (2) time-specific effects, but no traditionally-tested effects, (3) traditionally-tested effects, but no time-specific effects, and (4) combinations of traditional and time-specific effects in 3 proportions.
Results showed the proposed multilevel approach demonstrated appropriate type 1 error rates and increased power to detect treatment effects during hypothesized times by 31-38 percentage points compared to traditional approaches. This was consistent across varying proportions of traditional versus time-specific effects, and there was no loss of power using the multilevel approach when only traditional effects were present.
The current study showed potential advantages of testing time-specific hypotheses about intervention effects using a multilevel time-specific approach. This approach may show intervention effects when traditional approaches do not. Future research should explore the application of this additional analytic tool for accelerometer physical activity estimates.
分析加速度计数据的常用方法通常使用单一的身体活动结果变量,如平均每周或总的身体活动量。这些方法限制了能够回答的研究问题类型,并且未能利用加速度计提供的详细的、特定时间的信息。本研究提出使用多水平模型,该模型在特定时间段测试干预效果。
有启发性的例子是“今日主动选择”试验。通过模拟来测试,与传统方法相比,应用关于身体活动干预治疗效果预期出现时间(如课后时间)的特定时间假设是否能提高检测效果的效能。
测试了六种模拟条件:(1)无治疗效果(以测试I型错误率),(2)特定时间效果,但无传统测试效果,(3)传统测试效果,但无特定时间效果,以及(4)传统效果和特定时间效果按3种比例的组合。
结果表明,所提出的多水平方法显示出适当的I型错误率,并且与传统方法相比,在假设时间段内检测治疗效果的效能提高了31 - 38个百分点。这在传统效果与特定时间效果的不同比例下都是一致的,并且当仅存在传统效果时,使用多水平方法不会损失效能。
当前研究显示了使用多水平特定时间方法测试关于干预效果的特定时间假设的潜在优势。当传统方法未显示时,这种方法可能会显示干预效果。未来研究应探索将这种额外的分析工具应用于加速度计身体活动估计。