Lyu Jiwon, Kim Bum-Joon, Kim Byeong-Joon, Song Jin Woo, Choi Chang-Min, Oh Yeon-Mok, Lee Sang-Do, Kim Woo Sung, Kim Dong Soon, Shim Tae Sun
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, South Korea.
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Respir Med. 2014 Nov;108(11):1706-12. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
Mycobacterium abscessus complex is the second most common organism isolated from patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) lung disease in South Korea. This study aimed to compare clinical features and treatment outcomes of M. abscessus and Mycobacterium massiliense lung disease.
We retrospectively identified stored clinical isolates of M. abscessus complex as either M. abscessus or M. massiliense and reviewed medical records to compare clinical characteristics and treatment responses. All patients were treated empirically over several months with multidrug regimens, including a macrolide and one or more parenteral agents.
Of the 249 patient isolates tested, 128 (59 with M. abscessus and 69 with M. massiliense) met the American Thoracic Society diagnostic criteria for NTM pulmonary disease, and treatment outcomes were analyzed in 48 patients (26 with M. abscessus and 22 with M. massiliense). The clinical and radiologic findings were similar between the two groups. Although the durations of parenteral and total treatment were significantly shorter in patients with M. massiliense than in those with M. abscessus (4.7 months vs 7.4 months, P = .006, and 12.1 months vs 16.3 months, P = .043), the treatment success rate was significantly higher in patients with M. massiliense (95.5%) than in M. abscessus cases (42.3%, P < .001).
Patients with M. massiliense pulmonary infection responded better to this antibiotic strategy than those with M. abscessus infection. A shortened duration of treatment may be sufficient for M. massiliense pulmonary infection.
脓肿分枝杆菌复合体是韩国非结核分枝杆菌(NTM)肺病患者中分离出的第二常见病原体。本研究旨在比较脓肿分枝杆菌和马赛分枝杆菌肺病的临床特征及治疗结果。
我们回顾性地将存储的脓肿分枝杆菌复合体临床分离株鉴定为脓肿分枝杆菌或马赛分枝杆菌,并查阅病历以比较临床特征和治疗反应。所有患者均接受了数月的经验性多药治疗方案,包括大环内酯类药物和一种或多种胃肠外用药。
在检测的249例患者分离株中,128例(59例脓肿分枝杆菌和69例马赛分枝杆菌)符合美国胸科学会NTM肺病的诊断标准,并对48例患者(26例脓肿分枝杆菌和22例马赛分枝杆菌)的治疗结果进行了分析。两组的临床和影像学表现相似。虽然马赛分枝杆菌患者的胃肠外治疗和总治疗时间明显短于脓肿分枝杆菌患者(4.7个月对7.4个月,P = 0.006;12.1个月对16.3个月,P = 0.043),但马赛分枝杆菌患者的治疗成功率(95.5%)明显高于脓肿分枝杆菌患者(42.3%,P < 0.001)。
与脓肿分枝杆菌感染患者相比,马赛分枝杆菌肺部感染患者对这种抗生素策略反应更好。对于马赛分枝杆菌肺部感染,缩短治疗时间可能就足够了。