Suppr超能文献

哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与头孢吡肟单药治疗作为血液系统和恶性疾病患儿发热性中性粒细胞减少症经验性治疗的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。

Comparison between piperacillin/tazobactam and cefepime monotherapies as an empirical therapy for febrile neutropenia in children with hematological and malignant disorders: A prospective, randomized study.

作者信息

Sano Hirozumi, Kobayashi Ryoji, Suzuki Daisuke, Kishimoto Kenji, Yasuda Kazue, Kobayashi Kunihiko

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Sapporo Hokuyu Hospital, Higashi-Sapporo 6-6, Shiroishi-ku, Sapporo, Japan.

出版信息

Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015 Feb;62(2):356-358. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25178. Epub 2014 Sep 22.

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of piperacillin/tazobactam (PIPC/TAZ) or cefepime (CFPM) monotherapy for febrile neutropenia (FN) in children, a total of 53 patients with 213 febrile episodes were randomly treated with either PIPC/TAZ 337.5 mg/kg/day, or CFPM 100 mg/kg/day. No significant differences were observed in the success rates of the PIPC/TAZ and CFPM treatments (62.1% vs. 59.1%, P = 0.650). Furthermore, no differences were noted in the rates of new infection and mortality, and no serious adverse effects occurred in either of groups. Both PIPC/TAZ and CFPM were effective and safe as an empirical therapy for FN in children. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015;62:356-358. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

摘要

为评估哌拉西林/他唑巴坦(PIPC/TAZ)或头孢吡肟(CFPM)单药治疗儿童发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)的疗效和安全性,共有53例患者出现213次发热发作,被随机给予PIPC/TAZ 337.5mg/kg/天或CFPM 100mg/kg/天治疗。PIPC/TAZ和CFPM治疗的成功率未观察到显著差异(62.1%对59.1%,P = 0.650)。此外,新感染率和死亡率也无差异,两组均未发生严重不良反应。PIPC/TAZ和CFPM作为儿童FN的经验性治疗均有效且安全。《儿科血液肿瘤学》2015年;62:356 - 358。©2014威利期刊公司。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验