Suppr超能文献

英国一家癌症中心引入每周放疗质量保证会议的影响。

Impact of the introduction of weekly radiotherapy quality assurance meetings at one UK cancer centre.

作者信息

Brammer C V, Pettit L, Allerton R, Churn M, Joseph M, Koh P, Sayers I, King M

机构信息

1 The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Clatterbridge Road, Bebington, Wirral, UK.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2014 Nov;87(1043):20140422. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140422. Epub 2014 Sep 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The complexity of radiotherapy planning is increasing rapidly. Delivery and planning is subject to detailed quality assurance (QA) checks. The weakest link is often the oncologists' delineation of the clinical target volume (CTV). Weekly departmental meetings for radiotherapy QA (RTQA) were introduced into the Royal Wolverhampton Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK, in October 2011. This article describes the impact of this on patient care.

METHODS

CTVs for megavoltage photon radiotherapy courses for all radical, adjuvant and palliative treatments longer than five fractions (with the exception of two field tangential breast treatments not enrolled into clinical trials) were reviewed in the RTQA meeting. Audits were carried out in January 2012 (baseline) and September 2013, each over a 4-week period. Adherence to departmental contouring protocols was assessed and the number of major and minor alterations following peer review were determined.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference for major alterations between the two study groups; 8 alterations in 80 patients (10%) for the baseline audit vs 3 alterations from 72 patients (4.2%) in the second audit (p = 0.17). A trend towards a reduction in alterations following peer review was observed. There has, however, been a change in practice resulting in a reduction in variation in CTV definition within our centre and greater adherence to protocols. There is increasing confidence in the quality and constancy of care delivered.

CONCLUSION

Introduction of a weekly QA meeting for target volume definition has facilitated consensus and adoption of departmental clinical guidelines within the unit.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The weakest areas in radiotherapy are patient selection and definition of the CTV. Engagement in high-quality RTQA is paramount. This article describes the impact of this in one UK cancer centre.

摘要

目的

放射治疗计划的复杂性正在迅速增加。治疗实施和计划需接受详细的质量保证(QA)检查。最薄弱的环节往往是肿瘤学家对临床靶区(CTV)的勾画。2011年10月,英国伍尔弗汉普顿皇家医院引入了每周一次的放射治疗质量保证(RTQA)科室会议。本文描述了此举对患者护理的影响。

方法

在RTQA会议上审查了所有疗程超过5次分割的根治性、辅助性和姑息性兆伏级光子放射治疗的CTV(两项未纳入临床试验的两野切线乳腺治疗除外)。分别于2012年1月(基线)和2013年9月进行了为期4周的审核。评估了对科室轮廓勾画方案的遵守情况,并确定了同行评审后的主要和次要更改数量。

结果

两个研究组之间的主要更改在统计学上无显著差异;基线审核中80例患者有8处更改(10%),第二次审核中72例患者有3处更改(4.2%)(p = 0.17)。观察到同行评审后更改有减少的趋势。然而,实践中发生了变化,导致我们中心内CTV定义的差异减少,对方案的遵守情况更好。对所提供护理的质量和稳定性的信心不断增强。

结论

引入每周一次的靶区定义QA会议促进了科室内部对临床指南的共识和采用。

知识进展

放射治疗中最薄弱的环节是患者选择和CTV的定义。参与高质量的RTQA至关重要。本文描述了其在英国一家癌症中心的影响。

相似文献

1
Impact of the introduction of weekly radiotherapy quality assurance meetings at one UK cancer centre.
Br J Radiol. 2014 Nov;87(1043):20140422. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140422. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
2
Peer Review of Radiotherapy Planning: Quantifying Outcomes and a Proposal for Prospective Data Collection.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2016 Dec;28(12):e192-e198. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
3
Quality assurance of the SCOPE 1 trial in oesophageal radiotherapy.
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Nov 15;12(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0916-7.
6
Consistency in seroma contouring for partial breast radiotherapy: impact of guidelines.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Oct 1;66(2):372-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.05.066.
7
Does a central review platform improve the quality of radiotherapy for rectal cancer? Results of a national quality assurance project.
Radiother Oncol. 2014 Jun;111(3):400-5. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.03.003. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
10
Quality Assurance Peer Review for Radiotherapy for Haematological Malignancies.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2019 Oct;31(10):e1-e8. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.06.010. Epub 2019 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Radiologist Involvement in Radiation Oncology Peer Review: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2452667. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52667.
3
Chasing Zero Harm in Radiation Oncology: Using Pre-treatment Peer Review.
Front Oncol. 2019 Apr 24;9:302. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00302. eCollection 2019.
4
The impact of the introduction of a palliative Macmillan consultant radiographer at one UK cancer centre.
Br J Radiol. 2016 Sep;89(1065):20160286. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160286. Epub 2016 Jul 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Prospective peer review quality assurance for outpatient radiation therapy.
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014 Sep-Oct;4(5):279-284. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2013.11.004. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
2
Enhancing the role of case-oriented peer review to improve quality and safety in radiation oncology: Executive summary.
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2013 Jul-Sep;3(3):149-156. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2012.11.010. Epub 2013 Mar 16.
3
Does quality of radiation therapy predict outcomes of multicenter cooperative group trials? A literature review.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Oct 1;87(2):246-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.036. Epub 2013 May 15.
4
Radiotherapy protocol deviations and clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis of cooperative group clinical trials.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Mar 20;105(6):387-93. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt001. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
5
Impact of quality assurance rounds in a Canadian radiation therapy department.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Mar 1;85(3):e117-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.10.015. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
7
Quality assurance peer review chart rounds in 2011: a survey of academic institutions in the United States.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Nov 1;84(3):590-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.029. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
8
Heterogeneity in head and neck IMRT target design and clinical practice.
Radiother Oncol. 2012 Apr;103(1):92-8. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.02.010. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
9
Improving quality of patient care by improving daily practice in radiation oncology.
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2012 Jan;22(1):77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2011.09.002.
10
Survey of the availability and use of advanced radiotherapy technology in the UK.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2010 Oct;22(8):636-42. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2010.06.014. Epub 2010 Jul 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验