Brammer C V, Pettit L, Allerton R, Churn M, Joseph M, Koh P, Sayers I, King M
1 The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Clatterbridge Road, Bebington, Wirral, UK.
Br J Radiol. 2014 Nov;87(1043):20140422. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140422. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
The complexity of radiotherapy planning is increasing rapidly. Delivery and planning is subject to detailed quality assurance (QA) checks. The weakest link is often the oncologists' delineation of the clinical target volume (CTV). Weekly departmental meetings for radiotherapy QA (RTQA) were introduced into the Royal Wolverhampton Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK, in October 2011. This article describes the impact of this on patient care.
CTVs for megavoltage photon radiotherapy courses for all radical, adjuvant and palliative treatments longer than five fractions (with the exception of two field tangential breast treatments not enrolled into clinical trials) were reviewed in the RTQA meeting. Audits were carried out in January 2012 (baseline) and September 2013, each over a 4-week period. Adherence to departmental contouring protocols was assessed and the number of major and minor alterations following peer review were determined.
There was no statistically significant difference for major alterations between the two study groups; 8 alterations in 80 patients (10%) for the baseline audit vs 3 alterations from 72 patients (4.2%) in the second audit (p = 0.17). A trend towards a reduction in alterations following peer review was observed. There has, however, been a change in practice resulting in a reduction in variation in CTV definition within our centre and greater adherence to protocols. There is increasing confidence in the quality and constancy of care delivered.
Introduction of a weekly QA meeting for target volume definition has facilitated consensus and adoption of departmental clinical guidelines within the unit.
The weakest areas in radiotherapy are patient selection and definition of the CTV. Engagement in high-quality RTQA is paramount. This article describes the impact of this in one UK cancer centre.
放射治疗计划的复杂性正在迅速增加。治疗实施和计划需接受详细的质量保证(QA)检查。最薄弱的环节往往是肿瘤学家对临床靶区(CTV)的勾画。2011年10月,英国伍尔弗汉普顿皇家医院引入了每周一次的放射治疗质量保证(RTQA)科室会议。本文描述了此举对患者护理的影响。
在RTQA会议上审查了所有疗程超过5次分割的根治性、辅助性和姑息性兆伏级光子放射治疗的CTV(两项未纳入临床试验的两野切线乳腺治疗除外)。分别于2012年1月(基线)和2013年9月进行了为期4周的审核。评估了对科室轮廓勾画方案的遵守情况,并确定了同行评审后的主要和次要更改数量。
两个研究组之间的主要更改在统计学上无显著差异;基线审核中80例患者有8处更改(10%),第二次审核中72例患者有3处更改(4.2%)(p = 0.17)。观察到同行评审后更改有减少的趋势。然而,实践中发生了变化,导致我们中心内CTV定义的差异减少,对方案的遵守情况更好。对所提供护理的质量和稳定性的信心不断增强。
引入每周一次的靶区定义QA会议促进了科室内部对临床指南的共识和采用。
放射治疗中最薄弱的环节是患者选择和CTV的定义。参与高质量的RTQA至关重要。本文描述了其在英国一家癌症中心的影响。