• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Impact of the introduction of weekly radiotherapy quality assurance meetings at one UK cancer centre.英国一家癌症中心引入每周放疗质量保证会议的影响。
Br J Radiol. 2014 Nov;87(1043):20140422. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140422. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
2
Peer Review of Radiotherapy Planning: Quantifying Outcomes and a Proposal for Prospective Data Collection.放射治疗计划的同行评审:结果量化及前瞻性数据收集建议
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2016 Dec;28(12):e192-e198. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
3
Quality assurance of the SCOPE 1 trial in oesophageal radiotherapy.食管放射治疗 SCOPE1 试验的质量保证。
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Nov 15;12(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0916-7.
4
Delineation of target volumes and organs at risk in adjuvant radiotherapy of early breast cancer: national guidelines and contouring atlas by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group.早期乳腺癌辅助放疗中靶区和危及器官的勾画:丹麦乳腺癌合作组的国家指南和勾画图谱。
Acta Oncol. 2013 May;52(4):703-10. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.765064. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
5
Prospective Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Real-Time Peer Review Quality Assurance Rounds Incorporating Direct Physical Examination for Head and Neck Cancer Radiation Therapy.对头颈部癌放射治疗中纳入直接体格检查的实时同行评审质量保证环节的前瞻性定性和定量分析。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jul 1;98(3):532-540. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.019. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
6
Consistency in seroma contouring for partial breast radiotherapy: impact of guidelines.保乳放疗中血清肿轮廓勾画的一致性:指南的影响
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Oct 1;66(2):372-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.05.066.
7
Does a central review platform improve the quality of radiotherapy for rectal cancer? Results of a national quality assurance project.中央审查平台是否能提高直肠癌放疗质量?一项全国质量保证计划的结果。
Radiother Oncol. 2014 Jun;111(3):400-5. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.03.003. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
8
[Factors influencing clinical target volume delineation of intact breast in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for breast cancer].[影响乳腺癌调强放疗中完整乳腺临床靶区勾画的因素]
Ai Zheng. 2006 Jan;25(1):62-5.
9
A teaching intervention in a contouring dummy run improved target volume delineation in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Reducing the interobserver variability in multicentre clinical studies.在轮廓模拟演练中进行教学干预可改善局部晚期非小细胞肺癌的靶区勾画:减少多中心临床研究中的观察者间变异性。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2015 Jun;191(6):525-33. doi: 10.1007/s00066-015-0812-8. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
10
Quality Assurance Peer Review for Radiotherapy for Haematological Malignancies.血液恶性肿瘤放射治疗的质量保证同行评审。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2019 Oct;31(10):e1-e8. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.06.010. Epub 2019 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Radiologist Involvement in Radiation Oncology Peer Review: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.放射科医生参与放射肿瘤学同行评审:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2452667. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52667.
2
Three discipline collaborative radiation therapy (3DCRT) special debate: Peer review in radiation oncology is more effective today than 20 years ago.三维适形放疗(3DCRT)专题辩论:当今放射肿瘤学中的同行评审比20年前更有效。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Nov;21(11):7-13. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13103. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
3
Chasing Zero Harm in Radiation Oncology: Using Pre-treatment Peer Review.放射肿瘤学中追求零伤害:利用治疗前同行评审。
Front Oncol. 2019 Apr 24;9:302. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00302. eCollection 2019.
4
The impact of the introduction of a palliative Macmillan consultant radiographer at one UK cancer centre.英国一家癌症中心引入姑息治疗麦克米伦顾问放射技师的影响。
Br J Radiol. 2016 Sep;89(1065):20160286. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160286. Epub 2016 Jul 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Prospective peer review quality assurance for outpatient radiation therapy.门诊放射治疗的前瞻性同行评审质量保证
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014 Sep-Oct;4(5):279-284. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2013.11.004. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
2
Enhancing the role of case-oriented peer review to improve quality and safety in radiation oncology: Executive summary.加强以病例为导向的同行评审在提高放射肿瘤学质量与安全方面的作用:执行摘要。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2013 Jul-Sep;3(3):149-156. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2012.11.010. Epub 2013 Mar 16.
3
Does quality of radiation therapy predict outcomes of multicenter cooperative group trials? A literature review.放疗质量能否预测多中心合作组试验的结果?文献综述。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Oct 1;87(2):246-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.036. Epub 2013 May 15.
4
Radiotherapy protocol deviations and clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis of cooperative group clinical trials.放疗方案偏差与临床结局:合作组临床试验的荟萃分析。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Mar 20;105(6):387-93. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt001. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
5
Impact of quality assurance rounds in a Canadian radiation therapy department.加拿大放射治疗部门质量保证巡查的影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Mar 1;85(3):e117-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.10.015. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
6
Interobserver variation in clinical target volume and organs at risk segmentation in post-parotidectomy radiotherapy: can segmentation protocols help?术后腮腺放疗中临床靶区和危及器官分割的观察者间变异性:分割方案是否有帮助?
Br J Radiol. 2012 Aug;85(1016):e530-6. doi: 10.1259/bjr/66693547.
7
Quality assurance peer review chart rounds in 2011: a survey of academic institutions in the United States.2011 年的质量保证同行评审图表查房:对美国学术机构的调查。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Nov 1;84(3):590-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.029. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
8
Heterogeneity in head and neck IMRT target design and clinical practice.头颈部调强适形放疗靶区设计和临床实践中的异质性。
Radiother Oncol. 2012 Apr;103(1):92-8. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.02.010. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
9
Improving quality of patient care by improving daily practice in radiation oncology.通过改善放射肿瘤学的日常实践来提高患者护理质量。
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2012 Jan;22(1):77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2011.09.002.
10
Survey of the availability and use of advanced radiotherapy technology in the UK.英国先进放疗技术的供应和使用情况调查。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2010 Oct;22(8):636-42. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2010.06.014. Epub 2010 Jul 27.

英国一家癌症中心引入每周放疗质量保证会议的影响。

Impact of the introduction of weekly radiotherapy quality assurance meetings at one UK cancer centre.

作者信息

Brammer C V, Pettit L, Allerton R, Churn M, Joseph M, Koh P, Sayers I, King M

机构信息

1 The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Clatterbridge Road, Bebington, Wirral, UK.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2014 Nov;87(1043):20140422. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140422. Epub 2014 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1259/bjr.20140422
PMID:25251520
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4207165/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The complexity of radiotherapy planning is increasing rapidly. Delivery and planning is subject to detailed quality assurance (QA) checks. The weakest link is often the oncologists' delineation of the clinical target volume (CTV). Weekly departmental meetings for radiotherapy QA (RTQA) were introduced into the Royal Wolverhampton Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK, in October 2011. This article describes the impact of this on patient care.

METHODS

CTVs for megavoltage photon radiotherapy courses for all radical, adjuvant and palliative treatments longer than five fractions (with the exception of two field tangential breast treatments not enrolled into clinical trials) were reviewed in the RTQA meeting. Audits were carried out in January 2012 (baseline) and September 2013, each over a 4-week period. Adherence to departmental contouring protocols was assessed and the number of major and minor alterations following peer review were determined.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference for major alterations between the two study groups; 8 alterations in 80 patients (10%) for the baseline audit vs 3 alterations from 72 patients (4.2%) in the second audit (p = 0.17). A trend towards a reduction in alterations following peer review was observed. There has, however, been a change in practice resulting in a reduction in variation in CTV definition within our centre and greater adherence to protocols. There is increasing confidence in the quality and constancy of care delivered.

CONCLUSION

Introduction of a weekly QA meeting for target volume definition has facilitated consensus and adoption of departmental clinical guidelines within the unit.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The weakest areas in radiotherapy are patient selection and definition of the CTV. Engagement in high-quality RTQA is paramount. This article describes the impact of this in one UK cancer centre.

摘要

目的

放射治疗计划的复杂性正在迅速增加。治疗实施和计划需接受详细的质量保证(QA)检查。最薄弱的环节往往是肿瘤学家对临床靶区(CTV)的勾画。2011年10月,英国伍尔弗汉普顿皇家医院引入了每周一次的放射治疗质量保证(RTQA)科室会议。本文描述了此举对患者护理的影响。

方法

在RTQA会议上审查了所有疗程超过5次分割的根治性、辅助性和姑息性兆伏级光子放射治疗的CTV(两项未纳入临床试验的两野切线乳腺治疗除外)。分别于2012年1月(基线)和2013年9月进行了为期4周的审核。评估了对科室轮廓勾画方案的遵守情况,并确定了同行评审后的主要和次要更改数量。

结果

两个研究组之间的主要更改在统计学上无显著差异;基线审核中80例患者有8处更改(10%),第二次审核中72例患者有3处更改(4.2%)(p = 0.17)。观察到同行评审后更改有减少的趋势。然而,实践中发生了变化,导致我们中心内CTV定义的差异减少,对方案的遵守情况更好。对所提供护理的质量和稳定性的信心不断增强。

结论

引入每周一次的靶区定义QA会议促进了科室内部对临床指南的共识和采用。

知识进展

放射治疗中最薄弱的环节是患者选择和CTV的定义。参与高质量的RTQA至关重要。本文描述了其在英国一家癌症中心的影响。