• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管放射治疗 SCOPE1 试验的质量保证。

Quality assurance of the SCOPE 1 trial in oesophageal radiotherapy.

机构信息

Department of Medical Physics, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, CF14 2TL, UK.

National Radiotherapy Trials QA (RTTQA) Group, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, CF14 2TL, UK.

出版信息

Radiat Oncol. 2017 Nov 15;12(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0916-7.

DOI:10.1186/s13014-017-0916-7
PMID:29141663
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5688711/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

SCOPE 1 was the first UK based multi-centre trial involving radiotherapy of the oesophagus. A comprehensive radiotherapy trials quality assurance programme was launched with two main aims: 1. To assist centres, where needed, to adapt their radiotherapy techniques in order to achieve protocol compliance and thereby enable their participation in the trial. 2. To support the trial's clinical outcomes by ensuring the consistent planning and delivery of radiotherapy across all participating centres.

METHODS

A detailed information package was provided and centres were required to complete a benchmark case in which the delineated target volumes and organs at risk, dose distribution and completion of a plan assessment form were assessed prior to recruiting patients into the trial. Upon recruiting, the quality assurance (QA) programme continued to monitor the outlining and planning of radiotherapy treatments. Completion of a questionnaire was requested in order to gather information about each centre's equipment and techniques relating to their trial participation and to assess the impact of the trial nationally on standard practice for radiotherapy of the oesophagus. During the trial, advice was available for individual planning issues, and was circulated amongst the SCOPE 1 community in response to common areas of concern using bulletins.

RESULTS

36 centres were supported through QA processes to enable their participation in SCOPE1. We discuss the issues which have arisen throughout this process and present details of the benchmark case solutions, centre questionnaires and on-trial protocol compliance. The range of submitted benchmark case GTV volumes was 29.8-67.8cm; and PTV volumes 221.9-513.3 cm. For the dose distributions associated with these volumes, the percentage volume of the lungs receiving 20Gy (V20Gy) ranged from 20.4 to 33.5%. Similarly, heart V40Gy ranged from 16.1 to 33.0%. Incidence of incorrect outlining of OAR volumes increased from 50% of centres at benchmark case, to 64% on trial. Sixty-five percent of centres, who returned the trial questionnaire, stated that their standard practice had changed as a result of their participation in the SCOPE1 trial.

CONCLUSIONS

The SCOPE 1 QA programme outcomes lend support to the trial's clinical conclusions. The range of patient planning outcomes for the benchmark case indicated, at the outset of the trial, the significant degree of variation present in UK oesophageal radiotherapy planning outcomes, despite the presence of a protocol. This supports the case for increasingly detailed definition of practice by means of consensus protocols, training and peer review. The incidence of minor inconsistencies of technique highlights the potential for improved QA systems and the need for sufficient resource for this to be addressed within future trials. As indicated in questionnaire responses, the QA exercise as a whole has contributed to greater consistency of oesophageal radiotherapy in the UK via the adoption into standard practice of elements of the protocol.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The SCOPE1 trial is an International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial, ISRCTN47718479 .

摘要

背景

SCOPE1 是英国首例涉及食管放射治疗的多中心试验。启动了一项全面的放射治疗试验质量保证计划,主要有两个目标:1. 协助有需要的中心调整放射治疗技术,以达到协议要求,从而使其能够参与试验。2. 通过确保所有参与中心的放射治疗计划和实施的一致性,支持试验的临床结果。

方法

提供了详细的信息包,要求中心完成基准案例,在该案例中,在招募患者参加试验之前,评估勾画的靶区和危及器官、剂量分布以及完成计划评估表。在招募之后,质量保证(QA)计划继续监测放射治疗的勾画和计划。要求完成一份调查问卷,以收集与每个中心参与试验相关的设备和技术的信息,并评估该试验对全国食管放射治疗标准实践的影响。在试验过程中,为个别计划问题提供了建议,并通过公告在 SCOPE1 社区中进行了交流,以解决共同关注的问题。

结果

通过 QA 流程支持了 36 个中心参与 SCOPE1。我们讨论了整个过程中出现的问题,并介绍了基准案例解决方案、中心调查问卷和试验期间协议遵守情况的详细信息。提交的基准案例 GTV 体积范围为 29.8-67.8cm;PTV 体积为 221.9-513.3cm。对于与这些体积相关的剂量分布,肺部接受 20Gy(V20Gy)的体积百分比范围为 20.4%至 33.5%。同样,心脏 V40Gy 范围为 16.1%至 33.0%。不正确勾画 OAR 体积的发生率从基准案例时的 50%中心增加到试验时的 64%。返回试验问卷的 65%中心表示,他们的标准实践因参与 SCOPE1 试验而发生了变化。

结论

SCOPE1 QA 计划的结果支持了试验的临床结论。基准案例的患者计划结果范围表明,尽管存在协议,但英国食管放射治疗计划结果存在很大程度的差异。这支持了通过共识协议、培训和同行评审来更详细地定义实践的情况。技术上的轻微不一致性表明需要改进 QA 系统,并需要在未来的试验中投入足够的资源来解决这一问题。正如问卷回答所表明的,整个 QA 工作通过采用协议中的要素,促进了英国食管放射治疗的更大一致性。

试验注册

SCOPE1 试验是一项国际标准随机对照试验,ISRCTN47718479。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b8/5688711/0950e2fa31b7/13014_2017_916_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b8/5688711/ac7906445ffd/13014_2017_916_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b8/5688711/000fef48d642/13014_2017_916_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b8/5688711/44549390ef8a/13014_2017_916_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b8/5688711/a4999a50fdb4/13014_2017_916_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b8/5688711/a8ac7dfa2899/13014_2017_916_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b8/5688711/e60290594f4f/13014_2017_916_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b8/5688711/1756325948f0/13014_2017_916_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b8/5688711/0950e2fa31b7/13014_2017_916_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b8/5688711/ac7906445ffd/13014_2017_916_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b8/5688711/000fef48d642/13014_2017_916_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b8/5688711/44549390ef8a/13014_2017_916_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b8/5688711/a4999a50fdb4/13014_2017_916_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b8/5688711/a8ac7dfa2899/13014_2017_916_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b8/5688711/e60290594f4f/13014_2017_916_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b8/5688711/1756325948f0/13014_2017_916_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b8/5688711/0950e2fa31b7/13014_2017_916_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality assurance of the SCOPE 1 trial in oesophageal radiotherapy.食管放射治疗 SCOPE1 试验的质量保证。
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Nov 15;12(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0916-7.
2
Is pre-trial quality assurance necessary? Experiences of the CONVERT Phase III randomized trial for good performance status patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer.审前质量保证是否必要?CONVERT 三期随机试验针对体能状态良好的局限期小细胞肺癌患者的经验。
Br J Radiol. 2014 May;87(1037):20130653. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20130653. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
3
Driving developments in UK oesophageal radiotherapy through the SCOPE trials.通过 SCOPE 试验推动英国食管放疗的发展。
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Feb 4;14(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1225-0.
4
Radiotherapy Quality Assurance in the SCOPE2 Trial: What Lessons can be Learned for the Next UK Trial in Oesophageal Cancer?SCOPE2试验中的放射治疗质量保证:对于英国下一项食管癌试验我们能吸取哪些经验教训?
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2025 Feb;38:103735. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.103735. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
5
Radiotherapy Quality Assurance for the CHHiP Trial: Conventional Versus Hypofractionated High-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer.CHHiP 试验的放射治疗质量保证:前列腺癌常规与低分割高剂量强度调制放射治疗的比较。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2019 Sep;31(9):611-620. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.05.009. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
6
Pre-trial quality assurance processes for an intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) trial: PARSPORT, a UK multicentre Phase III trial comparing conventional radiotherapy and parotid-sparing IMRT for locally advanced head and neck cancer.调强放射治疗(IMRT)试验的审前质量保证流程:PARSPORT,一项英国多中心III期试验,比较传统放疗与腮腺保留IMRT治疗局部晚期头颈癌的疗效。
Br J Radiol. 2009 Jul;82(979):585-94. doi: 10.1259/bjr/31966505. Epub 2009 Mar 30.
7
Technical quality assurance during the TROG 03.04 RADAR prostate radiotherapy trial: are the results reflected in observed toxicity rates?TROG 03.04 RADAR前列腺癌放射治疗试验中的技术质量保证:观察到的毒性率是否反映了结果?
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2015 Feb;59(1):99-108. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12212. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
8
Quality assurance analysis of participating centres' protocol compliance to a UK multicentre hypofractionated breast (FAST) trial.参与中心对英国多中心 Hypofractionated Breast(FAST)试验方案依从性的质量保证分析。
Br J Radiol. 2012 Sep;85(1017):e647-53. doi: 10.1259/bjr/32249628. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
9
Quality Assurance of Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy in a Randomized Trial for Locally Advanced Oesophageal cancer.剂量递增放疗治疗局部晚期食管癌随机试验的质量保证。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Oct 1;105(2):329-337. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.2542. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
10
Questionnaire based quality assurance for the RT01 trial of dose escalation in conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer (ISRCTN 47772397).基于问卷调查的前列腺癌适形放疗剂量递增RT01试验的质量保证(国际标准随机对照试验编号:47772397)
Radiother Oncol. 2004 Nov;73(2):199-207. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.08.017.

引用本文的文献

1
Radiotherapy quality assurance in the PROTECT trial - a European randomised phase III-trial comparing proton and photon therapy in the treatment of patients with oesophageal cancer.PROTECT试验中的放射治疗质量保证——一项欧洲随机III期试验,比较质子治疗和光子治疗在食管癌患者治疗中的效果。
Acta Oncol. 2025 Mar 13;64:406-414. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42774.
2
Impact of on-trial IGRT quality assurance in an international adaptive radiotherapy trial for participants with bladder cancer.国际自适应放疗试验中试验中影像引导放疗质量保证对膀胱癌患者的影响。
Radiother Oncol. 2024 Oct;199:110460. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110460. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of investigator-delineated gross tumour volumes and quality assurance in pancreatic cancer: Analysis of the on-trial cases for the SCALOP trial.胰腺癌中研究者划定的大体肿瘤体积与质量保证的比较:SCALOP试验的试验病例分析
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Aug;120(2):212-6. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
2
Prospective review of radiotherapy trials through implementation of standardized multicentre workflow and IT infrastructure.通过实施标准化的多中心工作流程和信息技术基础设施对放射治疗试验进行前瞻性审查。
Br J Radiol. 2016 Aug;89(1064):20160020. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160020. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
3
The dosimetric impact of target volume delineation variation for cervical cancer radiotherapy.
Association of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT parameters with neoadjuvant therapy response and survival in esophagogastric cancer.
动态对比增强 MRI 和 F-氟脱氧葡萄糖 PET/CT 参数与食管胃交界癌新辅助治疗反应和生存的相关性。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct;49(10):106934. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.05.009. Epub 2023 May 10.
4
Recognising the challenges of implementing multi-centre adaptive plan of the day radiotherapy.认识到实施多中心当日适应性放疗计划的挑战。
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2022 Feb 9;21:31-35. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.01.002. eCollection 2022 Mar.
5
Driving developments in UK oesophageal radiotherapy through the SCOPE trials.通过 SCOPE 试验推动英国食管放疗的发展。
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Feb 4;14(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1225-0.
宫颈癌放疗中靶区勾画差异的剂量学影响。
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Sep;120(3):493-499. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.04.028. Epub 2016 May 6.
4
Improving target volume delineation in intact cervical carcinoma: Literature review and step-by-step pictorial atlas to aid contouring.改善完整宫颈癌的靶区勾画:文献综述及辅助轮廓勾画的分步图谱
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2016 Sep-Oct;6(5):e203-e213. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
5
Quality assurance for clinical trials.临床试验的质量保证。
Front Oncol. 2013 Dec 19;3:311. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00311.
6
Chemoradiotherapy with or without cetuximab in patients with oesophageal cancer (SCOPE1): a multicentre, phase 2/3 randomised trial.西妥昔单抗联合或不联合放化疗治疗食管癌患者(SCOPE1):一项多中心、2/3 期随机试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jun;14(7):627-37. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70136-0. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
7
Oesophageal Chemoradiotherapy in the UK--current practice and future directions.英国的食管放化疗——当前实践与未来方向。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2013 Jun;25(6):368-77. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2013.01.006. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
8
Improving radiotherapy quality assurance in clinical trials: assessment of target volume delineation of the pre-accrual benchmark case.提高临床试验中的放射治疗质量保证:预入组基准病例靶区勾画的评估。
Br J Radiol. 2013 Apr;86(1024):20120398. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20120398. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
9
Toward semi-automated assessment of target volume delineation in radiotherapy trials: the SCOPE 1 pretrial test case.面向放疗试验中靶区勾画的半自动评估:SCOPE1 预试验案例。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Nov 15;84(4):1037-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.094. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
10
Radiotherapy quality assurance: facilitation of radiotherapy research and implementation of technology.放射治疗质量保证:促进放射治疗研究与技术实施
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2012 Dec;24(10):710-2. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2012.06.006. Epub 2012 Aug 1.