Stone Orrin J, Biette Kelly M, Murphy Patrick J M
The Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Laboratory, Colleges of Nursing and Science & Engineering, Seattle University, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 25;9(9):e108611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108611. eCollection 2014.
Hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) most commonly requires experimental determination (i.e., scouting) in order to select an optimal chromatographic medium for purifying a given target protein. Neither a two-step purification of untagged green fluorescent protein (GFP) from crude bacterial lysate using sequential HIC and size exclusion chromatography (SEC), nor HIC column scouting elution profiles of GFP, have been previously reported.
Bacterial lysate expressing recombinant GFP was sequentially adsorbed to commercially available HIC columns containing butyl, octyl, and phenyl-based HIC ligands coupled to matrices of varying bead size. The lysate was fractionated using a linear ammonium phosphate salt gradient at constant pH. Collected HIC eluate fractions containing retained GFP were then pooled and further purified using high-resolution preparative SEC. Significant differences in presumptive GFP elution profiles were observed using in-line absorption spectrophotometry (A395) and post-run fluorimetry. SDS-PAGE and western blot demonstrated that fluorometric detection was the more accurate indicator of GFP elution in both HIC and SEC purification steps. Comparison of composite HIC column scouting data indicated that a phenyl ligand coupled to a 34 µm matrix produced the highest degree of target protein capture and separation.
Conducting two-step protein purification using the preferred HIC medium followed by SEC resulted in a final, concentrated product with >98% protein purity. In-line absorbance spectrophotometry was not as precise of an indicator of GFP elution as post-run fluorimetry. These findings demonstrate the importance of utilizing a combination of detection methods when evaluating purification strategies. GFP is a well-characterized model protein, used heavily in educational settings and by researchers with limited protein purification experience, and the data and strategies presented here may aid in development other of HIC-compatible protein purification schemes.
疏水作用色谱法(HIC)通常需要进行实验测定(即筛选),以便为纯化给定的目标蛋白选择最佳的色谱介质。此前尚未报道过使用连续HIC和尺寸排阻色谱法(SEC)从粗细菌裂解物中两步纯化无标签绿色荧光蛋白(GFP),也未报道过GFP的HIC柱筛选洗脱曲线。
将表达重组GFP的细菌裂解物依次吸附到市售的HIC柱上,这些柱含有与不同珠粒大小的基质偶联的丁基、辛基和苯基HIC配体。使用在恒定pH下的线性磷酸铵盐梯度对裂解物进行分级分离。然后将收集到的含有保留的GFP的HIC洗脱级分合并,并使用高分辨率制备型SEC进一步纯化。使用在线吸收分光光度法(A395)和运行后荧光法观察到推定的GFP洗脱曲线存在显著差异。SDS-PAGE和蛋白质印迹表明,荧光检测是HIC和SEC纯化步骤中GFP洗脱的更准确指标。复合HIC柱筛选数据的比较表明,与34 µm基质偶联的苯基配体产生了最高程度的目标蛋白捕获和分离。
使用首选的HIC介质进行两步蛋白纯化,然后进行SEC,得到了最终的浓缩产物,蛋白纯度>98%。在线吸光度分光光度法作为GFP洗脱的指标不如运行后荧光法精确。这些发现证明了在评估纯化策略时结合使用多种检测方法的重要性。GFP是一种特征明确的模型蛋白,在教育环境中以及蛋白纯化经验有限的研究人员中大量使用,此处呈现的数据和策略可能有助于开发其他与HIC兼容的蛋白纯化方案。