Johnson M A, Newman S P, Bloom R, Talaee N, Clarke S W
Department of Thoracic Medicine, Royal Free Hospital, London, England.
Chest. 1989 Jul;96(1):6-10. doi: 10.1378/chest.96.1.6.
Bronchodilator responses to both nebulized albuterol (salbutamol) and ipratropium bromide and aerosol delivery to the tracheobronchial tree have been assessed in eight patients with chronic stable asthma (mean baseline FEV1, 50 percent; reversibility greater than 20 percent). Two commercially available nebulizer systems were used, namely, a Turret nebulizer operated at a compressed gas flow rate of 12 L/min (droplet MMD, 3.3 mu) and an Inspiron nebulizer driven at 6 L/min (MMD, 7.7 mu). Albuterol was given as doses of 250 micrograms, 250 micrograms, 500 micrograms, and 1,000 micrograms (cumulative dose, 2 mg) and ipratropium bromide as doses of 50 micrograms, 50 micrograms, 100 micrograms, and 200 micrograms (cumulative dose, 400 micrograms) at intervals of 35 minutes. For albuterol, bronchodilatation was significantly (p less than 0.05) greater at all dosage levels with the Turret. For ipratropium, bronchodilatation was similar for both nebulizers. Measurements of aerosol deposition using 99mTc-labelled pentetic acid (diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid; DTPA) showed that 9.1 +/- 1.1 percent and 2.7 +/- 0.2 percent of the dose reached the lungs during nebulization to dryness for Turret and Inspiron, respectively (p less than 0.01); distribution within the lungs was similar for the two aerosols. Selection of nebulizer apparatus can influence delivery of aerosol and subsequent bronchodilator response to albuterol in patients with chronic stable asthma but is less important for aerosol delivery of ipratropium bromide in these patients.
对8例慢性稳定型哮喘患者(平均基线第一秒用力呼气容积[FEV1]为预计值的50%;可逆性大于20%)评估了雾化吸入沙丁胺醇(舒喘灵)和异丙托溴铵的支气管扩张反应以及气雾剂向气管支气管树的递送情况。使用了两种市售雾化器系统,即一种转塔雾化器,以12L/min的压缩气体流速运行(液滴质量中值直径[MMD]为3.3μm),以及一种因斯派隆雾化器,以6L/min驱动(MMD为7.7μm)。沙丁胺醇的给药剂量分别为250μg、250μg、500μg和1000μg(累积剂量2mg),异丙托溴铵的给药剂量分别为50μg、50μg、100μg和200μg(累积剂量400μg),间隔35分钟给药。对于沙丁胺醇,在所有剂量水平下,转塔雾化器引起的支气管扩张均显著更大(p<0.05)。对于异丙托溴铵,两种雾化器引起的支气管扩张相似。使用99mTc标记的喷替酸(二乙三胺五乙酸;DTPA)进行的气溶胶沉积测量显示,在雾化至干燥过程中,转塔雾化器和因斯派隆雾化器分别有9.1±1.1%和2.7±0.2%的剂量到达肺部(p<0.01);两种气雾剂在肺内的分布相似。在慢性稳定型哮喘患者中,雾化器装置的选择可影响气雾剂的递送以及随后对沙丁胺醇的支气管扩张反应,但对这些患者中异丙托溴铵气雾剂的递送影响较小。