Mitchell Jolyon, Newman Steve, Chan Hak-Kim
Trudell Medical International, 725 Third Street, London, Ontario, Canada.
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2007 Dec 21;8(4):E110. doi: 10.1208/pt0804110.
The purpose of this review is to discuss the roles of cascade impactor (CI) data in inhaler assessment and to examine the relationship between aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) and the clinical response to inhaled drugs. A systematic literature search of studies linking APSD to clinical response was undertaken. Two distinct roles for CI-generated data were identified: (1) the control of inhaler/drug product quality; and (2) the provision of data that may be predictive of particle deposition in the respiratory tract. Method robustness is required for the former application, combined with simplicity in operation, resulting in rudimentary attempts to mimic the anatomy of the respiratory tract. The latter necessitates making the apparatus and its operation more closely resemble patient use of the inhaler. A CI cannot perfectly simulate the respiratory tract, since it operates at constant flow rate, while the respiratory cycle has a varying flow-time profile. On the basis of a review of studies linking APSD to clinical response of inhaled drugs, it is concluded that attempts to use CI-generated data from quality control testing to compare products for bioequivalence are likely to have only limited success, as links between laboratory-measured APSD, particle deposition in the respiratory tract, and clinical response are not straightforward.
本综述的目的是讨论多级冲击式采样器(CI)数据在吸入器评估中的作用,并探讨空气动力学粒径分布(APSD)与吸入药物临床反应之间的关系。我们对将APSD与临床反应相关联的研究进行了系统的文献检索。确定了CI生成的数据的两个不同作用:(1)吸入器/药物产品质量的控制;(2)提供可能预测呼吸道颗粒沉积的数据。前一种应用需要方法的稳健性,同时操作要简单,这导致了模拟呼吸道解剖结构的初步尝试。后一种情况则需要使仪器及其操作更接近患者使用吸入器的情况。CI无法完美模拟呼吸道,因为它以恒定流速运行,而呼吸周期具有变化的流量-时间曲线。基于对将APSD与吸入药物临床反应相关联的研究的综述,得出的结论是,试图使用质量控制测试中CI生成的数据来比较产品的生物等效性可能只会取得有限的成功,因为实验室测量的APSD、呼吸道颗粒沉积和临床反应之间的联系并不直接。