• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左撇子人群中存在右手喂食偏好的证据。

Evidence for right-hand feeding biases in a left-handed population.

机构信息

a The Brain in Action Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education , University of Lethbridge , Lethbridge , AB , Canada.

出版信息

Laterality. 2015 May;20(3):287-305. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2014.961472. Epub 2014 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1080/1357650X.2014.961472
PMID:25256315
Abstract

We have recently shown that actions with similar kinematic requirements, but different end-state goals may be supported by distinct neural networks. Specifically, we demonstrated that when right-handed individuals reach-to-grasp food items with intent to eat, they produce smaller maximum grip apertures (MGAs) than when they grasp the same item with intent to place it in a location near the mouth. This effect was restricted to right-handed movements; left-handed movements showed no difference between tasks. The current study investigates whether (and to which side) the effect may be lateralized in left-handed individuals. Twenty-one self-identified left-handed participants grasped food items of three different sizes while grasp kinematics were captured via an Optotrak Certus motion capture array. A main effect of task was identified wherein the grasp-to-eat action generated significantly smaller MGAs than did the grasp-to-place action. Further analysis revealed that similar to the findings in right-handed individuals, this effect was significant only during right-handed movements. Upon further inspection however, we found individual differences in the magnitude and direction of the observed lateralization. These results underscore the evolutionary significance of the grasp-to-eat movement in producing population-level right-handedness in humans as well as highlighting the heterogeneity of the left-handed population.

摘要

我们最近的研究表明,具有相似运动学要求但不同目标的动作可能由不同的神经网络支持。具体来说,我们证明了当右利手个体意图进食时伸手去抓食物时,他们产生的最大握力开口(MGA)比意图将食物放在靠近嘴的位置时要小。这种效应仅限于右手运动;左手运动在任务之间没有差异。本研究调查了左利手个体是否(以及向哪一侧)存在这种效应的偏侧化。21 名自我认定的左利手参与者在三种不同大小的食物物品上进行抓握,同时通过 Optotrak Certus 运动捕捉阵列捕获抓握运动学。任务的主要效应表明,抓握进食的动作产生的 MGA 明显小于抓握放置的动作。进一步的分析表明,与右利手个体的发现相似,这种效应仅在右手运动时显著。然而,进一步检查发现,观察到的偏侧化的幅度和方向存在个体差异。这些结果强调了在人类中产生群体水平的右利手时,抓握进食动作的进化意义,同时突出了左利手人群的异质性。

相似文献

1
Evidence for right-hand feeding biases in a left-handed population.左撇子人群中存在右手喂食偏好的证据。
Laterality. 2015 May;20(3):287-305. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2014.961472. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
2
Eating interrupted: the effect of intent on hand-to-mouth actions.进食被打断:意图对从手到口动作的影响。
J Neurophysiol. 2014 Oct 15;112(8):2019-25. doi: 10.1152/jn.00295.2014. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
3
The inimitable mouth: task-dependent kinematic differences are independent of terminal precision.独特的嘴部:任务依赖的运动学差异与末端精度无关。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Jun;235(6):1945-1952. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4943-2. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
4
Children's bilateral advantage for grasp-to-eat actions becomes unimanual by age 10 years.儿童抓握进食动作的双侧优势在10岁时变为单侧。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 May;133:57-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.01.011. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
5
Kinematics of ventrally mediated grasp-to-eat actions: right-hand advantage is dependent on dorsal stream input.腹侧介导的抓握进食动作的运动学:右手优势依赖于背侧通路输入。
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Jun;236(6):1621-1630. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5242-2. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
6
On the Neurocircuitry of Grasping: The influence of action intent on kinematic asymmetries in reach-to-grasp actions.论抓握的神经回路:动作意图对伸手抓握动作中运动不对称性的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Oct;81(7):2217-2236. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01805-5.
7
On the evolution of handedness: evidence for feeding biases.关于利手性的进化:进食偏侧性的证据。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 13;8(11):e78967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078967. eCollection 2013.
8
Hear speech, change your reach: changes in the left-hand grasp-to-eat action during speech processing.倾听言语,改变伸手动作:言语处理过程中左手抓握进食动作的变化。
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Dec;236(12):3267-3277. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5376-2. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
9
Manual asymmetries in the kinematics of a reach-to-grasp action.伸手抓握动作运动学中的手动不对称性。
Laterality. 2014;19(4):489-507. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2013.862540. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
10
The destination defines the journey: an examination of the kinematics of hand-to-mouth movements.目标决定旅程:对口手动作的运动学研究。
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Nov 1;116(5):2105-2113. doi: 10.1152/jn.00222.2016. Epub 2016 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Can the left hand benefit from being right? The influence of body side on perceived grasping ability.左手能从像右手一样灵活中获益吗?身体侧别对感知抓握能力的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Nov;86(8):2834-2843. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02983-7. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
2
The left cerebral hemisphere may be dominant for the control of bimanual symmetric reach-to-grasp movements.左侧大脑半球可能在控制双手对称伸手抓握运动中占主导地位。
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Dec;237(12):3297-3311. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05672-2. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
3
Hear speech, change your reach: changes in the left-hand grasp-to-eat action during speech processing.
倾听言语,改变伸手动作:言语处理过程中左手抓握进食动作的变化。
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Dec;236(12):3267-3277. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5376-2. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
4
Kinematics of ventrally mediated grasp-to-eat actions: right-hand advantage is dependent on dorsal stream input.腹侧介导的抓握进食动作的运动学:右手优势依赖于背侧通路输入。
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Jun;236(6):1621-1630. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5242-2. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
5
The inimitable mouth: task-dependent kinematic differences are independent of terminal precision.独特的嘴部:任务依赖的运动学差异与末端精度无关。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Jun;235(6):1945-1952. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4943-2. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
6
The destination defines the journey: an examination of the kinematics of hand-to-mouth movements.目标决定旅程:对口手动作的运动学研究。
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Nov 1;116(5):2105-2113. doi: 10.1152/jn.00222.2016. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
7
The contributions of vision and haptics to reaching and grasping.视觉和触觉在伸手和抓握动作中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 16;6:1403. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01403. eCollection 2015.
8
Hand preference across the lifespan: effects of end-goal, task nature, and object location.毕生的手偏好:目标终点、任务性质和物体位置的影响。
Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 20;5:1579. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01579. eCollection 2014.
9
Speech in action: degree of hand preference for grasping predicts speech articulation competence in children.行动中的言语:儿童抓握时的手偏好程度可预测言语清晰度能力。
Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 6;5:1267. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01267. eCollection 2014.