University Eye Clinic, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec;132(12):1462-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.3602.
Spectacle independence is becoming increasingly important in cataract surgery. Not correcting corneal astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery will fail to achieve spectacle independency in 20% to 30% of patients.
To compare bilateral aspherical toric with bilateral aspherical control intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in patients with cataract and corneal astigmatism.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A multicenter, hospital-based, randomized clinical trial was conducted. The participants included 86 individuals with bilateral cataract and bilateral corneal astigmatism of at least 1.25 diopters (D) who were randomized to receive either bilateral toric (n = 41) or bilateral control (n = 45) IOL implantation.
Bilateral implantation of an aspherical toric IOL or an aspherical control IOL.
Spectacle independency for distance vision, uncorrected distance visual acuity, refractive astigmatism, contrast sensitivity, wavefront aberrations, and refractive error-related quality-of-life questionnaire.
Preoperatively, mean (SD) corneal astigmatism was 2.02 (0.95) D and 2.00 (0.84) D in the toric and control groups, respectively. Four patients (5%) were lost to follow-up. At 6 months postoperatively, 26 (70%) of the patients in the toric group achieved an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/25 or better compared with 14 (31%) in the control group (P < .001; odds ratio, 5.23; 95% CI, 2.03-13.48). Spectacle independency for distance vision was achieved in 31 patients (84%) in the toric group compared with 14 patients (31%) in the control group (P < .001; odds ratio, 11.44; 95% CI, 3.89- 33.63). Mean refractive astigmatism was -0.77 (0.52) D and -1.89 D (1.00) D, respectively. Vector analysis of toric IOLs showed a mean magnitude of error of +0.38 D, indicative of overcorrection. No significant differences were found in contrast sensitivity, higher-order aberrations, or refractive error-related quality of life.
In patients with cataract and corneal astigmatism, bilateral toric IOL implantation results in a higher spectacle independency for distance vision compared with bilateral control IOL implantation. No significant differences were identified in contrast sensitivity, higher-order aberrations, or refractive error-related quality of life following both treatments.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01075542.
在白内障手术中,不戴眼镜的独立性正变得越来越重要。如果不在白内障手术时矫正角膜散光,20%至 30%的患者将无法达到不戴眼镜的独立性。
比较白内障合并角膜散光患者双侧非球面散光性与双侧非球面对照性人工晶状体(IOL)植入的效果。
设计、地点和参与者:一项多中心、以医院为基础的随机临床试验。参与者包括 86 名双眼白内障合并至少 1.25 屈光度(D)的双眼角膜散光患者,他们被随机分为接受双侧散光性(n=41)或双侧对照性(n=45)IOL 植入组。
双侧植入非球面散光性 IOL 或非球面对照性 IOL。
远距视力、未矫正远视力、屈光性散光、对比敏感度、波前像差和与屈光不正相关的生活质量问卷。
术前,散光组和对照组的平均(标准差)角膜散光分别为 2.02(0.95)D 和 2.00(0.84)D。4 名患者(5%)失访。术后 6 个月,散光组 26 名(70%)患者的未矫正远视力达到 20/25 或更好,而对照组为 14 名(31%)(P<0.001;优势比,5.23;95%CI,2.03-13.48)。散光组 31 名(84%)患者达到远距视力不戴眼镜,而对照组为 14 名(31%)(P<0.001;优势比,11.44;95%CI,3.89-33.63)。平均屈光性散光分别为-0.77(0.52)D 和-1.89 D(1.00)D。散光性 IOL 的矢量分析显示平均误差幅度为+0.38 D,表明存在过矫。两组在对比敏感度、高阶像差或与屈光不正相关的生活质量方面均无显著差异。
在白内障合并角膜散光患者中,与双侧对照性 IOL 植入相比,双侧散光性 IOL 植入可使远距视力的不戴眼镜独立性更高。两种治疗方法在对比敏感度、高阶像差或与屈光不正相关的生活质量方面均无显著差异。
clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT01075542。