Wakeman Sarah E, Pham-Kanter Genevieve, Baggett Meridale V, Campbell Eric G
a Department of Medicine , Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston , Massachusetts , USA.
b Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School , Boston , Massachusetts , USA.
Subst Abus. 2015;36(4):427-33. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2014.962722. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
The authors' previous study found that despite caring for many patients with addiction, most Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) internal medicine residents feel unprepared to treat substance use disorders (SUDs) and rate SUD instruction during training as fair or poor. This follow-up study evaluates the impact of an enhanced curriculum on resident perceptions of the quality of instruction, knowledge base, and self-perceived preparedness to diagnose and treat SUDs.
Based on the findings of the earlier study, an enhanced SUD curriculum was designed and delivered to MGH medicine residents. Impact of the curriculum was evaluated using the same Web-based survey that was administered in the earlier study to compare pre- and posttest results.
The authors' earlier study found that 75% of residents felt prepared to diagnose and 37% to treat SUDs and 45% of residents rated the overall quality of SUD instruction as good or excellent. Following the curriculum intervention, 87% of residents reported feeling prepared to diagnose (P=.028) and 60% to treat (P=.002) SUDs. Three quarters of residents rated the overall quality of instruction as good or excellent (P<.001), and 98% reported residency curriculum had a positive impact on their preparedness to care for patients with a SUDs. Residents who reported receiving an adequate amount of SUD instruction were more likely to feel prepared to diagnose and treat addiction (P<.001). Thirty-one percent of residents still rated the overall amount of SUD instruction as too little. The intervention did not significantly improve answers to knowledge questions.
An enhanced SUDs curriculum for medicine residents increased self-perceived preparedness to diagnose and treat SUDs and educational quality ratings. However, there was no significant change in knowledge. Implementation of a more comprehensive curriculum and evaluation at other sites are necessary to determine the ideal SUD training model.
作者之前的研究发现,尽管马萨诸塞州综合医院(MGH)的内科住院医师诊治过许多成瘾患者,但大多数人觉得自己没有准备好治疗物质使用障碍(SUD),并将培训期间的SUD教学评为一般或较差。这项后续研究评估了强化课程对住院医师对教学质量、知识库以及自我感知的诊断和治疗SUD准备程度的看法的影响。
根据早期研究的结果,设计了强化SUD课程并提供给MGH内科住院医师。使用与早期研究相同的基于网络的调查问卷来评估课程的影响,以比较测试前后的结果。
作者早期的研究发现,75%的住院医师觉得自己有准备诊断SUD,37%觉得有准备治疗SUD,45%的住院医师将SUD教学的整体质量评为良好或优秀。经过课程干预后,87%的住院医师报告觉得自己有准备诊断SUD(P = 0.028),60%觉得有准备治疗SUD(P = 0.002)。四分之三的住院医师将教学的整体质量评为良好或优秀(P < 0.001),98%的住院医师报告住院医师课程对他们治疗SUD患者的准备程度有积极影响。报告接受了足够数量SUD教学的住院医师更有可能觉得自己有准备诊断和治疗成瘾(P < 0.001)。31%的住院医师仍然认为SUD教学的总量太少。干预并没有显著提高知识问题的回答正确率。
针对内科住院医师的强化SUD课程提高了自我感知的诊断和治疗SUD的准备程度以及教育质量评级。然而,知识方面没有显著变化。有必要在其他地点实施更全面的课程和评估,以确定理想的SUD培训模式。