Cheng Bochao, Cai Wu, Sun Chongran, Kang Yan, Gong Jianping
Department of Radiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, PR China.
Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, PR China.
Acta Radiol. 2015 Sep;56(9):1127-34. doi: 10.1177/0284185114549495. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
Bone subtraction computed tomography angiography (BSCTA) is better able to facilitate the detection of intracranial aneurysms adjacent to bone structures compared to conventional non-subtracted CTA (CNSCTA). However, the comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) and two-dimensional (2D) BSCTA and conventional CTA in evaluating intracranial aneurysms remains unclear.
To evaluate whether 3D BSCTA has a superior diagnostic accuracy to those of 2D BSCTA and CNSCTA in a single center with the same instrument.
Sixty-three patients received 3D BSCTA, 2D BSCTA, and NSCTA for the detection and treatment planning of suspected intracranial aneurysms. The angiography readouts were reviewed by two independent radiologists. The sensitivity of CTA in detecting aneurysm was analyzed on a per-aneurysm and per-patient basis, using 3D digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and surgical findings as the gold standard. The potential of endovascular treatment or surgical clipping was also assessed based on information provided by the CTA.
A total of 66 aneurysms were detected in 54 patients. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of 3D BSCTA were all 100%, and these values for 2D BSCTA were 98.1%, 100%, 100%, and 90%, respectively. The total sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of CNSCTA were 94.4%, 100%, 100%, and 75%, respectively. Finally, 100%, 98.1%, and 85.2% patients received appropriate treatment decisions after 3D BSCTA, 2D BSCTA, and CNSCTA imaging, respectively.
3D BSCTA has a higher sensitivity for the detection of small aneurysms and aneurysms adjacent to bone compared to 2D BSCTA or CNSCTA, which were still able to obtain sufficient information for the detection of intracranial aneurysms and therapeutic decision-making.
与传统的非减影CT血管造影(CNSCTA)相比,骨减影CT血管造影(BSCTA)更有助于检测与骨结构相邻的颅内动脉瘤。然而,三维(3D)和二维(2D)BSCTA以及传统CTA在评估颅内动脉瘤时诊断准确性的比较仍不明确。
在同一中心使用相同仪器评估3D BSCTA在诊断准确性上是否优于2D BSCTA和CNSCTA。
63例患者接受了3D BSCTA、2D BSCTA和NSCTA检查,用于疑似颅内动脉瘤的检测和治疗规划。两位独立的放射科医生对血管造影读数进行了评估。以3D数字减影血管造影(DSA)和手术结果作为金标准,在每个动脉瘤和每位患者的基础上分析CTA检测动脉瘤的敏感性。还根据CTA提供的信息评估了血管内治疗或手术夹闭的可能性。
54例患者共检测出66个动脉瘤。3D BSCTA的总体敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值均为100%,2D BSCTA的这些值分别为98.1%、100%、100%和90%。CNSCTA的总体敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为94.4%、100%、100%和75%。最后,分别有100%、98.1%和85.2%的患者在接受3D BSCTA、2D BSCTA和CNSCTA成像后获得了适当的治疗决策。
与2D BSCTA或CNSCTA相比,3D BSCTA在检测小动脉瘤和与骨相邻的动脉瘤方面具有更高的敏感性,而2D BSCTA和CNSCTA仍能够获得足够的信息用于检测颅内动脉瘤和进行治疗决策。