Greer Anna Elizabeth, Marcello Rich, Graveline Rochelle
Sacred Heart University, Fairfield, CT, USA
Sacred Heart University, Fairfield, CT, USA.
Health Promot Pract. 2015 Mar;16(2):202-9. doi: 10.1177/1524839914551366. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
This study engaged community members to describe physical activity (PA) environments in parks and to examine if the PA environment in parks was related to the economic characteristics of households near parks.
Twenty-four Bridgeport, adult residents examined the PA environments in 21 Bridgeport, Connecticut, parks using the Community Stakeholder Park Audit Tool (CPAT) during the summer, 2013. ESRI's Geographical Information System was used to identify the economic characteristics (i.e., median household income, percentage of households below the poverty line; from 2010 Census data) of households within 0.5 miles of a park. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze CPAT data.
A negative association was identified between the parks' PA area and safety scores (p = .012). Positive associations were identified between the parks' PA area and amenities scores (p < .001), access and amenities scores (p = .006), and park safety concern and surrounding safety concern scores (p < .001). There were no significant associations between park environment indices and the economic characteristics of households less than 0.5 miles from parks. Community members recommended several strategies to enhance PA environments in parks.
The findings highlight the utility of CPAT for enabling community members identify opportunities to enhance PA environments in parks.
本研究邀请社区成员描述公园中的体育活动(PA)环境,并考察公园中的PA环境是否与公园附近家庭的经济特征相关。
2013年夏季,24名布里奇波特成年居民使用社区利益相关者公园审计工具(CPAT)对康涅狄格州布里奇波特的21个公园的PA环境进行了考察。利用ESRI的地理信息系统确定公园0.5英里范围内家庭的经济特征(即家庭收入中位数、贫困线以下家庭百分比;数据来自2010年人口普查)。使用描述性和推断性统计分析CPAT数据。
公园的PA区域与安全得分之间存在负相关(p = 0.012)。公园的PA区域与便利设施得分(p < 0.001)、可达性与便利设施得分(p = 0.006)以及公园安全关注度与周边安全关注度得分之间存在正相关(p < 0.001)。公园环境指数与距离公园不到0.5英里的家庭的经济特征之间没有显著关联。社区成员推荐了几种改善公园PA环境的策略。
研究结果突出了CPAT在使社区成员识别改善公园PA环境机会方面的效用。