• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公园特征对促进公园内规律身体活动重要性的横断面调查。

A Cross-Sectional Investigation of the Importance of Park Features for Promoting Regular Physical Activity in Parks.

机构信息

School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia.

Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Nov 2;14(11):1335. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111335.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph14111335
PMID:29099053
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5707974/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Parks in the US and Australia are generally underutilised, and park visitors typically engage in low levels of physical activity (PA). Better understanding park features that may encourage visitors to be active is important. This study examined the perceived importance of park features for encouraging park-based PA and examined differences by sex, age, parental-status and participation in PA.

METHODS

Cross-sectional surveys were completed by local residents ( = 2775) living near two parks (2013/2015). Demographic variables, park visitation and leisure-time PA were self-reported, respondents rated the importance of 20 park features for encouraging park-based PA in the next fortnight. Chi-square tests of independence examined differences in importance of park features for PA among sub-groups of local residents (sex, age, parental-status, PA).

RESULTS

Park features ranked most important for park-based PA were: well maintained (96.2%), feel safe (95.4%), relaxing atmosphere (91.2%), easy to get to (91.7%), and shady trees (90.3%). All subgroups ranked 'well maintained' as most important.

CONCLUSIONS

Natural and built environment features of parks are important for promoting adults' park-based PA, and should be considered in park (re)design.

摘要

简介

美国和澳大利亚的公园通常未被充分利用,公园游客的身体活动(PA)水平通常较低。更好地了解可能鼓励游客积极参与的公园特征非常重要。本研究调查了公园特征对鼓励基于公园的 PA 的感知重要性,并按性别、年龄、父母身份和参与 PA 的情况进行了差异分析。

方法

对居住在两个公园(2013/2015 年)附近的当地居民(n=2775)进行了横断面调查。人口统计学变量、公园访问和休闲时间 PA 都是自我报告的,受访者评估了 20 个公园特征对未来两周内基于公园的 PA 的重要性。独立性卡方检验分析了不同性别、年龄、父母身份和 PA 参与情况的当地居民群体在 PA 方面对公园特征的重要性差异。

结果

对基于公园的 PA 最重要的公园特征是:维护良好(96.2%)、感觉安全(95.4%)、氛围放松(91.2%)、容易到达(91.7%)和有阴凉的树木(90.3%)。所有亚组都将“维护良好”列为最重要的特征。

结论

公园的自然和建筑环境特征对促进成年人的公园内 PA 很重要,应在公园(重新)设计中予以考虑。

相似文献

1
A Cross-Sectional Investigation of the Importance of Park Features for Promoting Regular Physical Activity in Parks.公园特征对促进公园内规律身体活动重要性的横断面调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Nov 2;14(11):1335. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111335.
2
Adolescents' ratings of features of parks that encourage park visitation and physical activity.青少年对鼓励公园游览和体育活动的公园特征的评分。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Jul 4;13:73. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0391-9.
3
Is the Association between Park Proximity and Recreational Physical Activity among Mid-Older Aged Adults Moderated by Park Quality and Neighborhood Conditions?公园质量和社区环境是否会调节中老年成年人中公园距离与休闲体育活动之间的关联?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Feb 14;14(2):192. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14020192.
4
Are park proximity and park features related to park use and park-based physical activity among adults? Variations by multiple socio-demographic characteristics.公园的 proximity 和公园特征与成年人的公园使用及基于公园的身体活动有关吗?多种社会人口特征的差异。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Dec 6;11:146. doi: 10.1186/s12966-014-0146-4.
5
Promoting physical activity in high-poverty neighborhood parks: A cluster randomized controlled trial.在高贫困社区公园中促进身体活动:一项集群随机对照试验。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Aug;186:130-138. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
6
Are park availability and satisfaction with neighbourhood parks associated with physical activity and time spent outdoors?公园的可及性以及对社区公园的满意度与身体活动和户外停留时间有关联吗?
BMC Public Health. 2021 Feb 6;21(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10339-1.
7
How active are people in metropolitan parks? An observational study of park visitation in Australia.人们在城市公园中的活动情况如何?澳大利亚公园游客量的一项观察性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 4;15:610. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1960-6.
8
Association of psychosocial and perceived environmental factors with park-based physical activity among elderly in two cities in China and Germany.中德两国两城市中老年人群基于公园的体力活动与心理社会和感知环境因素的关联。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 14;20(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-8140-z.
9
Park Use and Physical Activity Among Mostly Low-to-Middle Income, Minority Parents and Their Children.大多数低收入至中等收入的少数族裔父母及其子女的公园使用情况与体育活动
J Phys Act Health. 2017 Feb;14(2):83-87. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2016-0310. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
10
The Association Between Park Facilities and Duration of Physical Activity During Active Park Visits.公园设施与积极公园访问期间身体活动时间的关联。
J Urban Health. 2018 Dec;95(6):869-880. doi: 10.1007/s11524-018-0311-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Research on the impact of the urban park built environment on physical activity.城市公园建成环境对身体活动影响的研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 5;15(1):28586. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13724-7.
2
Examining park features that encourage physical activity and social interaction among adults.研究鼓励成年人进行体育活动和社交互动的公园特征。
Health Promot Int. 2025 May 13;40(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf063.
3
Interrelationships and Trade-Offs between Urban Natural Space Use and Biodiversity.城市自然空间利用与生物多样性之间的相互关系及权衡取舍
Sustainability. 2024 May 2;16(10):4051. doi: 10.3390/su16104051.
4
The difference in the elderly's visual impact assessment of pocket park landscape.老年人对口袋公园景观视觉影响评估的差异。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 6;13(1):16895. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43522-y.
5
Parental Preference for Park Attributes Related to Children's Use of Parks in Low-Income, Racial/Ethnic Diverse Neighborhoods.低收入、种族/民族多样化社区中父母对与儿童公园使用相关的公园属性的偏好。
J Healthy Eat Act Living. 2020 Dec 1;1(1):6-15. eCollection 2020.
6
Development and Validation of the Mexican Public Open Spaces Tool (MexPOS).墨西哥公共开放空间工具(MexPOS)的开发与验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 5;19(13):8198. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138198.
7
What do adults want in parks? A qualitative study using walk-along interviews.成年人在公园中想要什么?一项采用步行访谈的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 14;22(1):753. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13064-5.
8
A Spatial Analysis of Access to Physical Activity Infrastructure and Healthy Food in Regional Tasmania.塔斯马尼亚地区获取体育活动基础设施和健康食品的空间分析。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 1;9:773609. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.773609. eCollection 2021.
9
Relationship between Green and Blue Spaces with Mental and Physical Health: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Observational Studies.绿色和蓝色空间与身心健康的关系:一项纵向观察研究的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 26;18(17):9010. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179010.
10
The Role of the Physical and Social Environment in Observed and Self-Reported Park Use in Low-Income Neighborhoods in New York City.物理和社会环境在纽约市低收入社区观察到和自我报告的公园使用中的作用。
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 20;9:656988. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.656988. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
How do type and size of natural environments relate to physical activity behavior?自然环境的类型和大小如何与身体活动行为相关?
Health Place. 2017 Jul;46:73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 13.
2
Neighbourhood greenspace is associated with a slower decline in physical activity in older adults: A prospective cohort study.社区绿地与老年人身体活动下降速度较慢有关:一项前瞻性队列研究。
SSM Popul Health. 2016 Dec;2:683-691. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.09.006.
3
Observational Park-based physical activity studies: A systematic review of the literature.基于公园的体力活动观察性研究:文献系统综述
Prev Med. 2016 Aug;89:257-277. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.06.016. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
4
Park availability and physical activity, TV time, and overweight and obesity among women: Findings from Australia and the United States.澳大利亚和美国女性的公园可及性与身体活动、看电视时间以及超重和肥胖状况:研究结果
Health Place. 2016 Mar;38:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.12.004. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
5
Impact of an outdoor gym on park users' physical activity: A natural experiment.户外健身房对公园使用者身体活动的影响:一项自然实验。
Health Place. 2016 Jan;37:26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
6
How active are people in metropolitan parks? An observational study of park visitation in Australia.人们在城市公园中的活动情况如何?澳大利亚公园游客量的一项观察性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 4;15:610. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1960-6.
7
Therapeutic landscapes and wellbeing in later life: Impacts of blue and green spaces for older adults.疗愈景观与晚年福祉:老年群体的蓝色和绿色空间影响。
Health Place. 2015 Jul;34:97-106. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 May 18.
8
Are park proximity and park features related to park use and park-based physical activity among adults? Variations by multiple socio-demographic characteristics.公园的 proximity 和公园特征与成年人的公园使用及基于公园的身体活动有关吗?多种社会人口特征的差异。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Dec 6;11:146. doi: 10.1186/s12966-014-0146-4.
9
The impact of interventions to promote physical activity in urban green space: a systematic review and recommendations for future research.促进城市绿地中身体活动的干预措施的影响:系统评价及对未来研究的建议。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Jan;124:246-56. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.051. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
10
Community members' assessment of the physical activity environments in their neighborhood parks: utility of the community stakeholder park audit tool.社区成员对其邻里公园体育活动环境的评估:社区利益相关者公园审计工具的效用
Health Promot Pract. 2015 Mar;16(2):202-9. doi: 10.1177/1524839914551366. Epub 2014 Sep 25.