Blarre Thomas, Bertrand Hugues-Olivier, Acher Francine C, Kehoe JacSue
Laboratoire de Chimie et Biochimie Pharmacologiques et Toxicologiques, UMR8601-Centre National de la Recherche Scientific, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France; Accelrys, Orsay, France.
Accelrys, Orsay, France.
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 26;9(9):e108458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108458. eCollection 2014.
Orthologous Cys-loop glutamate-gated chloride channels (GluClR's) have been cloned and described electrophysiologically and pharmacologically in arthropods and nematodes (both members of the invertebrate ecdysozoan superphylum). Recently, GluClR's from Aplysia californica (a mollusc from the lophotrochozoan superphylum) have been cloned and similarly studied. In spite of sharing a common function, the ecdysozoan and lophotrochozoan receptors have been shown by phylogenetic analyses to have evolved independently. The recent crystallization of the GluClR from C. elegans revealed the binding pocket of the nematode receptor. An alignment of the protein sequences of the nematode and molluscan GluClRs showed that the Aplysia receptor does not contain all of the residues defining the binding mode of the ecdysozoan receptor. That the two receptors have slightly different binding modes is not surprising since earlier electrophysiological and pharmacological experiments had suggested that they were differentially responsive to certain agonists. Knowledge of the structure of the C. elegans GluClR has permitted us to generate a homology model of the binding pocket of the Aplysia receptor. We have analyzed the differences between the two binding modes and evaluated the relative significance of their non-common residues. We have compared the GluClRs electrophysiologically and pharmacologically and we have used site-directed mutagenesis on both receptor types to test predictions made from the model. Finally, we propose an explanation derived from the model for why the nematode receptors are gated only by glutamate, whereas the molluscan receptors can also be activated by β-alanine, GABA and taurine. Like the Aplysia receptor, the vertebrate glycine and GABAA-ρ receptors also respond to these other agonists. An alignment of the sequences of the molluscan and vertebrate receptors shows that the reasons we have given for the ability of the other agonists to activate the Aplysia receptor also explain the agonist profile seen in the glycine and GABAA-ρ receptors.
直系同源的半胱氨酸环谷氨酸门控氯离子通道(GluClR)已在节肢动物和线虫(均为无脊椎蜕皮动物超门成员)中被克隆,并通过电生理学和药理学方法进行了描述。最近,加州海兔(一种冠轮动物超门的软体动物)的GluClR也已被克隆并进行了类似研究。尽管具有共同功能,但系统发育分析表明,蜕皮动物和冠轮动物的受体是独立进化的。秀丽隐杆线虫GluClR最近的晶体结构揭示了线虫受体的结合口袋。线虫和软体动物GluClR的蛋白质序列比对表明,海兔受体并不包含定义蜕皮动物受体结合模式的所有残基。这两种受体具有略有不同的结合模式并不奇怪,因为早期的电生理学和药理学实验表明它们对某些激动剂的反应不同。秀丽隐杆线虫GluClR的结构知识使我们能够生成海兔受体结合口袋的同源模型。我们分析了两种结合模式之间的差异,并评估了它们非共有残基的相对重要性。我们对两种受体类型进行了电生理学和药理学比较,并使用定点突变来检验从模型得出的预测。最后,我们从模型中提出了一个解释,说明为什么线虫受体仅由谷氨酸门控,而软体动物受体也可以被β-丙氨酸、GABA和牛磺酸激活。与海兔受体一样,脊椎动物的甘氨酸和GABAA-ρ受体也对这些其他激动剂有反应。软体动物和脊椎动物受体序列的比对表明,我们给出的关于其他激动剂激活海兔受体能力的原因也解释了在甘氨酸和GABAA-ρ受体中看到的激动剂谱。