Suppr超能文献

[介入性疼痛治疗。德国专业疼痛科医生的一项调查结果]

[Interventional pain therapy. Results of a survey among specialized pain physicians in Germany].

作者信息

Kortüm F C, Bräscher A-K, Schmitz-Buchholz D, Feldmann R E, Benrath J

机构信息

Schmerzzentrum, Klinik für Anästhesie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland.

出版信息

Schmerz. 2014 Dec;28(6):591-9. doi: 10.1007/s00482-014-1491-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Interventional pain therapy aims to treat pain which is refractory to pharmacologic and noninterventional treatment. Due to the partly lacking evidence and recommendations it remains unclear when interventional methods should be applied within the treatment pathway. This study assesses the current state of interventional methods in Germany and their leading indications comparing with the recommendations found in the literature.

METHODS

An online survey was conducted among German physicians specialized in pain therapy concerning the number of interventions they perform per quarter, which supporting measures they use, and their indications for sympathetic blocks, sensory blocks, intrathecal administration, and spinal cord stimulation.

RESULTS

A total of 109 physicians (23.5 %) participated in the survey. Blocks are most often performed on the stellate ganglion (94 %) and on the superior cervical ganglion (82 %). They are supported by anatomical landmarks and less often by imaging control. Both classic neuropathic pain diagnoses (e.g., complex regional pain syndrome) and diagnoses with a neuropathic pain component (e.g., peripheral arterial disease, tumor pain, and back pain) were considered as indications to perform interventional procedures.

CONCLUSION

Although there is no clear evidence on interventional procedures in the current literature, these methods are often performed by the respondents. Anatomic landmarks are most frequently used for orientation. The German pain physicians who responded consider especially neuropathic pain as an indication to perform interventional procedures for pain therapy.

摘要

背景

介入性疼痛治疗旨在治疗药物治疗和非介入性治疗均无效的疼痛。由于部分缺乏证据和建议,目前尚不清楚在治疗过程中何时应采用介入性方法。本研究评估了德国介入性方法的现状及其主要适应症,并与文献中的建议进行比较。

方法

对德国疼痛治疗领域的专科医生进行了一项在线调查,内容包括他们每季度进行的干预次数、所使用的辅助措施以及他们进行交感神经阻滞、感觉阻滞、鞘内给药和脊髓刺激的适应症。

结果

共有109名医生(23.5%)参与了调查。阻滞最常针对星状神经节(94%)和颈上神经节(82%)进行。操作依据主要是解剖标志,较少借助影像引导。经典的神经性疼痛诊断(如复杂性区域疼痛综合征)以及伴有神经性疼痛成分的诊断(如外周动脉疾病、肿瘤疼痛和背痛)均被视为进行介入性操作的适应症。

结论

尽管目前文献中对于介入性操作尚无明确证据,但这些方法在受访者中经常被采用。解剖标志是最常用的定位依据。参与调查的德国疼痛医生尤其将神经性疼痛视为进行疼痛治疗介入性操作的适应症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验