Wang Hsin-Hsiao S, Wiener John S, Ferrandino Michael N, Lipkin Michael E, Routh Jonathan C
Division of Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Division of Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
J Urol. 2015 Apr;193(4):1270-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.095. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
The management of upper urinary tract stones in patients with spina bifida is challenging but poorly described in the literature. We compared urolithiasis interventions and related complications in patients with spina bifida to those in other stone formers using a national database.
We retrospectively reviewed the NIS to identify hospital admissions for renal and ureteral stones from 1998 to 2011. We used ICD-9-CM codes to identify urological interventions, including shock wave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteral stent placement. NSQIP data were used to identify postoperative complications.
We identified 4,287,529 weighted stone hospital admissions, including 12,315 (0.3%) of patients with spina bifida. Compared to those without spina bifida the patients with spina bifida who had urolithiasis were significantly younger (mean age 34 vs 53 years), more likely to have public insurance (72% vs 44%) and renal vs ureteral calculi (81% vs 58%), and undergo percutaneous nephrolithotomy (27% vs 8%). After adjusting for age, insurance, comorbidity, treatment year, surgery type, stone location and hospital factors patients with spina bifida were more likely to have urinary tract infections (OR 2.5), urinary complications (OR 3.1), acute renal failure (OR 1.9), respiratory complications (OR 2.0), pneumonia (OR 1.5), respiratory insufficiency (OR 3.2), prolonged mechanical ventilation (OR 3.2), sepsis (OR 2.7), pulmonary embolism (OR 3.0), cardiac complications (OR 2.4) and bleeding (OR 1.6).
Compared to those without spina bifida the patients with spina bifida who were hospitalized for urolithiasis were younger, and more likely to have renal stones and undergo percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urolithiasis procedures in patients with spina bifida were associated with a significantly higher risk of in-hospital postoperative complications.
脊柱裂患者上尿路结石的治疗具有挑战性,但文献中对此描述甚少。我们使用国家数据库比较了脊柱裂患者与其他结石形成者的尿路结石干预措施及相关并发症。
我们回顾性分析了国家住院样本(NIS),以确定1998年至2011年因肾和输尿管结石而住院的患者。我们使用国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本(ICD-9-CM)编码来确定泌尿外科干预措施,包括冲击波碎石术、输尿管镜检查、经皮肾镜取石术和输尿管支架置入术。国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据用于确定术后并发症。
我们确定了4,287,529次加权结石住院病例,其中包括12,315例(0.3%)脊柱裂患者。与非脊柱裂患者相比,患有尿路结石的脊柱裂患者明显更年轻(平均年龄34岁对53岁),更有可能拥有公共保险(72%对44%),且肾结石与输尿管结石的比例更高(81%对58%),并接受经皮肾镜取石术(27%对8%)。在对年龄、保险、合并症、治疗年份、手术类型、结石位置和医院因素进行调整后,脊柱裂患者更有可能发生尿路感染(比值比2.5)、泌尿系统并发症(比值比3.1)、急性肾衰竭(比值比1.9)、呼吸系统并发症(比值比2.0)、肺炎(比值比1.5)、呼吸功能不全(比值比3.2)、机械通气时间延长(比值比3.2)、败血症(比值比2.7)、肺栓塞(比值比3.0)、心脏并发症(比值比2.4)和出血(比值比1.6)。
与非脊柱裂患者相比,因尿路结石住院的脊柱裂患者更年轻,更有可能患有肾结石并接受经皮肾镜取石术。脊柱裂患者的尿路结石手术与术后住院并发症的风险显著更高相关。