Suppr超能文献

根据我们自己的风险分组分类系统对甲状腺乳头状癌进行风险适应性管理:甲状腺叶切除术是低风险患者的首选治疗方法吗?

Risk-adapted management of papillary thyroid carcinoma according to our own risk group classification system: is thyroid lobectomy the treatment of choice for low-risk patients?

作者信息

Ebina Aya, Sugitani Iwao, Fujimoto Yoshihide, Yamada Keiko

机构信息

Division of Head and Neck, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.

Division of Head and Neck, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan; Division of Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Surgery. 2014 Dec;156(6):1579-88; discussion 1588-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.08.060. Epub 2014 Sep 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our original system for risk group classification for predicting cause-specific death from papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) defined patients with distant metastasis and older patients (≥ 50 years) with either massive extrathyroidal extension or large (≥ 3 cm) lymph node metastasis as high risk; all others are low risk. For unilateral, low-risk PTC, the extent of thyroidectomy (less-than-total thyroidectomy vs total or near-total thyroidectomy) has been determined based on the choice of the patient since 2005.

PATIENTS

Of 1,187 patients who underwent initial thyroidectomy for PTC (tumor size [T] >1 cm) between 1993 and 2010, 967 (82%) were classified as low risk. Among low-risk patients, 791 (82%) underwent less than total thyroidectomy.

RESULTS

The 10-year cause-specific survival and disease-free survival rates did not differ between patients who underwent total thyroidectomy versus less than total thyroidectomy (cause-specific survival, 99% vs 99% [P = .61]; disease-free survival, 91% vs 87% [P = .90]). Age ≥ 60 years, T ≥ 3 cm, and lymph node metastases >3 cm represented significant risk factors for distant recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The favorable overall survival of low-risk patients, regardless of the extent of thyroidectomy, supports patient autonomy in treatment-related decision making. Low-risk patients possessing risk factors for distant recurrence would be likely to benefit from total thyroidectomy followed by radioactive iodine.

摘要

背景

我们最初用于预测甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)特定病因死亡的风险分组系统将有远处转移的患者以及年龄较大(≥50岁)且有大量甲状腺外侵犯或大(≥3 cm)淋巴结转移的患者定义为高风险;其他所有患者为低风险。自2005年以来,对于单侧、低风险的PTC,甲状腺切除术的范围(次全甲状腺切除术与全甲状腺切除术或近全甲状腺切除术)一直由患者自行选择决定。

患者

1993年至2010年间,1187例因PTC(肿瘤大小[T]>1 cm)接受初次甲状腺切除术的患者中,967例(82%)被分类为低风险。在低风险患者中,791例(82%)接受了次全甲状腺切除术。

结果

接受全甲状腺切除术与次全甲状腺切除术的患者之间,10年特定病因生存率和无病生存率无差异(特定病因生存率,99%对99%[P = 0.61];无病生存率,91%对87%[P = 0.90])。年龄≥60岁、T≥3 cm和淋巴结转移>3 cm是远处复发的显著危险因素。

结论

低风险患者无论甲状腺切除术范围如何,总体生存率良好,这支持了患者在治疗相关决策中的自主权。具有远处复发危险因素的低风险患者可能会从全甲状腺切除术后放射性碘治疗中获益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验