Magraw Caitlin B L, Golden Brent, Phillips Ceib, Tang Dana T, Munson Joshua, Nelson Blake P, White Raymond P
Resident, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Jan;73(1):7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.06.458. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
To assess the association between patients' pericoronitis pain symptoms and quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes for lifestyle and oral function.
Subjects (American Society of Anesthesiologists health risk assessment level I or II) with mild symptoms of pericoronitis were enrolled in a study approved by the institutional review board and asked to complete a QOL instrument specifically for third molar problems covering lifestyle, oral function, and pain. Subjects assessed lifestyle and oral function using a 5-point Likert-type scale, ranging from "no trouble" (score, 1) to "lots of trouble" (score, 5), and worst and average pain using a 7-point Likert-type scale, ranging from "no pain" (score, 1) to "worst pain imaginable" (score, 7). Pain levels reported at enrollment were compared with QOL outcomes for lifestyle and oral function using Spearman correlation coefficients. Correlations of at least 0.6 were considered clinically quite important, and correlations of at least 0.4 were considered clinically important. Associations between these outcome measurements were considered statistically significant at a P value less than .05.
Most of the 113 subjects were Caucasian (51%), women (56%), 23 years old or younger (58%), and well educated (91% with at least some college). Mean pain levels ± standard deviation were low (worst pain, 3.3 ± 1.5; average pain, 2.4 ± 1.2). All pain outcomes were significantly associated with items in the lifestyle and oral function domains (P < .01). Clinically important correlations were seen between pain outcomes and daily routine, social life, eating a regular diet, chewing food, and talking (P < .0001).
Clinically important correlations existed between subjects' pericoronitis pain and lifestyle and oral function, associations not often considered by clinicians or policy makers.
评估患者冠周炎疼痛症状与生活方式及口腔功能的生活质量(QOL)结果之间的关联。
纳入有轻度冠周炎症状的受试者(美国麻醉医师协会健康风险评估I或II级),该研究经机构审查委员会批准,并要求他们完成一份专门针对第三磨牙问题的生活质量问卷,内容涵盖生活方式、口腔功能和疼痛。受试者使用5点李克特量表评估生活方式和口腔功能,从“无困扰”(得分1)到“诸多困扰”(得分5),并使用7点李克特量表评估最严重和平均疼痛程度,从“无疼痛”(得分1)到“难以想象的最严重疼痛”(得分7)。使用Spearman相关系数比较入组时报告的疼痛水平与生活方式和口腔功能的生活质量结果。相关性至少为0.6被认为具有临床重要意义,相关性至少为0.4被认为具有临床意义。这些结果测量之间的关联在P值小于0.05时被认为具有统计学意义。
113名受试者中大多数为白种人(51%)、女性(56%)、23岁及以下(58%)且受教育程度良好(91%至少上过一些大学)。平均疼痛水平±标准差较低(最严重疼痛,3.3±1.5;平均疼痛,2.4±1.2)。所有疼痛结果均与生活方式和口腔功能领域的项目显著相关(P<.01)。在疼痛结果与日常生活、社交生活、正常饮食、咀嚼食物和说话之间观察到具有临床意义的相关性(P<.0001)。
受试者的冠周炎疼痛与生活方式和口腔功能之间存在具有临床意义的相关性,而临床医生或政策制定者通常未考虑到这些关联。