Soares Célio Leone Ferreira, Douglas-de-Oliveira Dhelfeson Willya, Rocha Dos Santos Cássio Roberto, Flecha Olga Dumont, Glória José Cristiano Ramos, Gonçalves Patricia Furtado
Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Jequitinhonha and Mucuri Valleys, Rua da Glória, 187, Centro, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, 39100-000, Brazil.
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 28;25(1):1271. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06652-5.
Pericoronitis, a painful inflammation of the soft tissues around a partially erupted tooth, is generally treated with debridement and saline irrigation. Ozone's antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties make it a promising adjunctive therapy.
To evaluate the clinical effects and impact on quality of life of treating pericoronitis in lower third molars using ozonated water compared to physiological saline solution.
This study involved patients with pericoronitis in lower third molars, following CONSORT guidelines. Ethical approval was obtained from the UFVJM Research Ethics Committee (protocol number 5.922.185). Patients were divided into two groups: irrigation with ozonated water (OZO, n = 5) or saline solution (SAL, n = 5). The pain was assessed using a visual analog scale, and quality of life was evaluated using OHIP-14, OHIP14-PD Br, and SF-36 questionnaires. Evaluations were conducted at baseline, 24 h, and 3, 7, 15, and 30 days post-treatment. Clinical parameters assessed included probing depth (PD), bone crest level (BCL), mouth opening (MO), and extent of edema/erythema (EEE) in the pericoronal hood region. Plaque Index (PI), Bleeding Index on Probing (BOP), and lower third molar positioning were also evaluated using panoramic radiography.
Intra-group analysis 7 days after treatment showed a significant reduction in pain (SAL: p = 0.018; OZO: p = 0.002) and the extent of edema/erythema (SAL: p = 0.002). OHIP-14 scores indicated significant intra-group differences at 30 days post-treatment (SAL: p = 0.043; OZO: p = 0.041).
Ozonated water demonstrated similar efficacy to saline solution in managing pericoronitis, suggesting its potential as a viable alternative treatment.
This study presents an alternative treatment option for pericoronitis.
This clinical trial was registered at the Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (ReBec) under protocol RBR-79pss6w ( http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-79pss6w/ ), Date of registration: 22/11/2024.
冠周炎是指部分萌出牙齿周围软组织的疼痛性炎症,通常采用清创术和生理盐水冲洗进行治疗。臭氧的抗菌和抗炎特性使其成为一种有前景的辅助治疗方法。
评估与生理盐水相比,使用臭氧水治疗下颌第三磨牙冠周炎的临床效果及其对生活质量的影响。
本研究遵循CONSORT指南,纳入下颌第三磨牙冠周炎患者。获得了UFVJM研究伦理委员会的伦理批准(协议编号5.922.185)。患者分为两组:臭氧水冲洗组(OZO,n = 5)和生理盐水冲洗组(SAL,n = 5)。使用视觉模拟量表评估疼痛,并使用OHIP - 14、OHIP14 - PD Br和SF - 36问卷评估生活质量。在基线、治疗后24小时以及治疗后3、7、15和30天进行评估。评估的临床参数包括探诊深度(PD)、牙槽嵴顶水平(BCL)、开口度(MO)以及冠周龈袋区域的水肿/红斑程度(EEE)。还使用全景X线片评估菌斑指数(PI)、探诊出血指数(BOP)和下颌第三磨牙的位置。
治疗7天后的组内分析显示,疼痛(SAL:p = 0.018;OZO:p = 0.002)和水肿/红斑程度(SAL:p = 0.002)显著降低。OHIP - 14评分显示治疗后30天组内存在显著差异(SAL:p = 0.043;OZO:p = 0.041)。
臭氧水在治疗冠周炎方面显示出与生理盐水相似的疗效,表明其作为一种可行替代治疗方法的潜力。
本研究提出了一种冠周炎的替代治疗选择。
本临床试验已在巴西临床试验注册中心(ReBec)以协议编号RBR - 79pss6w(http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-
79pss6w/)注册,注册日期:2024年11月22日。