• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国使用的滤泡性淋巴瘤一线化学免疫治疗方案的疗效比较。

Comparison of the effectiveness of frontline chemoimmunotherapy regimens for follicular lymphoma used in the United States.

作者信息

Nastoupil Loretta J, Sinha Rajni, Byrtek Michelle, Ziemiecki Ryan, Taylor Michael, Friedberg Jonathan W, Koff Jean L, Link Brian K, Cerhan James R, Dawson Keith L, Flowers Christopher R

机构信息

The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, TX , USA.

出版信息

Leuk Lymphoma. 2015 May;56(5):1295-302. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2014.953144. Epub 2014 Nov 5.

DOI:10.3109/10428194.2014.953144
PMID:25263322
Abstract

To compare the effectiveness of frontline rituximab-chemotherapy regimens in clinical practice, we examined outcomes for patients with low-grade, stage III/IV follicular lymphoma receiving rituximab (R) with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP), R with cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone (R-CVP) or R with a fludarabine-based regimen (R-Flu) as frontline therapy. In total, 611 patients meeting these criteria were identified in the National LymphoCare Study: 47% receiving R-CHOP (n = 287), 31% receiving R-CVP (n = 187) and 22% receiving R-Flu (n = 137). Overall response rates were high (R-CVP 87%, R-CHOP 93%, R-Flu 94%; p = 0.017). Median follow-up was 7.4 years. R-CVP was associated with lower 5-year overall survival (R-CVP 76%, R-CHOP 86%, R-Flu 86%; p = 0.021) and progression-free survival (R-CVP 49%, R-CHOP 58%, R-Flu 64%; p = 0.029). There were no significant differences in survival in Cox models adjusted for baseline clinical factors, practice region/setting and post-treatment R maintenance/observation.

摘要

为比较一线利妥昔单抗化疗方案在临床实践中的有效性,我们研究了接受利妥昔单抗(R)联合环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱和泼尼松(R-CHOP)、R联合环磷酰胺、长春新碱和泼尼松(R-CVP)或R联合基于氟达拉滨的方案(R-Flu)作为一线治疗的低度、Ⅲ/Ⅳ期滤泡性淋巴瘤患者的结局。在国家淋巴瘤护理研究中,共确定了611例符合这些标准的患者:47%接受R-CHOP(n = 287),31%接受R-CVP(n = 187),22%接受R-Flu(n = 137)。总体缓解率较高(R-CVP 87%,R-CHOP 93%,R-Flu 94%;p = 0.017)。中位随访时间为7.4年。R-CVP与较低的5年总生存率(R-CVP 76%,R-CHOP 86%,R-Flu 86%;p = 0.021)和无进展生存率(R-CVP 49%,R-CHOP 58%,R-Flu 64%;p = 0.029)相关。在根据基线临床因素、实践地区/环境和治疗后R维持/观察进行调整的Cox模型中,生存率无显著差异。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the effectiveness of frontline chemoimmunotherapy regimens for follicular lymphoma used in the United States.美国使用的滤泡性淋巴瘤一线化学免疫治疗方案的疗效比较。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2015 May;56(5):1295-302. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2014.953144. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
2
Patterns of delivery of chemoimmunotherapy to patients with follicular lymphoma in the United States: results of the National LymphoCare Study.美国滤泡性淋巴瘤患者接受化疗免疫治疗的模式:国家淋巴瘤护理研究的结果。
Cancer. 2013 Dec 1;119(23):4129-36. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28350. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
3
Long-Term Results of the FOLL05 Trial Comparing R-CVP Versus R-CHOP Versus R-FM for the Initial Treatment of Patients With Advanced-Stage Symptomatic Follicular Lymphoma.FOLL05 试验的长期结果:比较 R-CVP、R-CHOP 和 R-FM 方案治疗初治晚期症状性滤泡性淋巴瘤患者的疗效。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;36(7):689-696. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.1652. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
4
R-CVP versus R-CHOP versus R-FM for the initial treatment of patients with advanced-stage follicular lymphoma: results of the FOLL05 trial conducted by the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi.R-CVP 对比 R-CHOP 对比 R-FM 用于晚期滤泡淋巴瘤患者的初始治疗:意大利淋巴瘤基金会 FOLL05 试验的结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Apr 20;31(12):1506-13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.0866. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
5
Assessing the Effectiveness of Treatment Sequences for Older Patients With High-risk Follicular Lymphoma With a Multistate Model.使用多状态模型评估高危滤泡性淋巴瘤老年患者治疗序列的有效性。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 May;19(5):300-309.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2018.12.019. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
6
Rituximab for the first-line treatment of stage III-IV follicular lymphoma (review of Technology Appraisal No. 110): a systematic review and economic evaluation.利妥昔单抗作为 III-IV 期滤泡性淋巴瘤的一线治疗药物(对技术评估第 110 号的回顾):一项系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(37):1-253, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta16370.
7
Early Relapse of Follicular Lymphoma After Rituximab Plus Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone Defines Patients at High Risk for Death: An Analysis From the National LymphoCare Study.利妥昔单抗联合环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱和泼尼松治疗后滤泡性淋巴瘤的早期复发预示患者死亡风险高:一项来自国家淋巴瘤关爱研究的分析
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug 10;33(23):2516-22. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.7534. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
8
Outcomes after R-CHOP in patients with newly diagnosed advanced follicular lymphoma: a 10-year follow-up analysis of the JCOG0203 trial.初治晚期滤泡性淋巴瘤患者接受R-CHOP方案治疗后的结局:JCOG0203试验的10年随访分析
Lancet Haematol. 2018 Nov;5(11):e520-e531. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30155-8.
9
Grade 3 Follicular Lymphoma: Outcomes in the Rituximab Era.3级滤泡性淋巴瘤:利妥昔单抗时代的治疗结果
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2017 Dec;17(12):797-803. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
10
Phase III study of R-CVP compared with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone alone in patients with previously untreated advanced follicular lymphoma.R-CVP与单纯环磷酰胺、长春新碱和泼尼松相比,用于既往未治疗的晚期滤泡性淋巴瘤患者的III期研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Oct 1;26(28):4579-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.5376. Epub 2008 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Surveillance imaging during first remission in follicular lymphoma does not impact overall survival.滤泡性淋巴瘤首次缓解期的监测性影像学检查并不影响总生存期。
Cancer. 2021 Sep 15;127(18):3390-3402. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33660. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
2
Obinutuzumab in Combination with Chemotherapy for the First-Line Treatment of Patients with Advanced Follicular Lymphoma : An Evidence Review Group Evaluation of the NICE Single Technology Appraisal.奥滨尤妥珠单抗联合化疗治疗初治晚期滤泡性淋巴瘤患者:NICE 单技术评估的证据审查组评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Aug;37(8):975-984. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0740-4.
3
Follicular Lymphoma: Past, Present, and Future.
滤泡性淋巴瘤:过去、现在与未来。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2018 May 24;19(7):32. doi: 10.1007/s11864-018-0550-0.
4
Unmet needs in the first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma.滤泡性淋巴瘤一线治疗中的未满足需求。
Ann Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;28(9):2094-2106. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx189.
5
High ten-year remission rates following rituximab, fludarabine, mitoxantrone and dexamethasone (R-FND) with interferon maintenance in indolent lymphoma: Results of a randomized Study.利妥昔单抗、氟达拉滨、米托蒽醌和地塞米松(R-FND)联合干扰素维持治疗惰性淋巴瘤的十年缓解率高:一项随机研究的结果
Br J Haematol. 2017 Apr;177(2):263-270. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14541. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
6
A phase II study of bortezomib added to rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone in patients with previously untreated indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.一项关于硼替佐米联合利妥昔单抗、环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱及泼尼松用于既往未治疗的惰性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的II期研究。
Br J Haematol. 2015 Nov;171(4):539-46. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13637. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
7
Next-generation surveillance strategies for patients with lymphoma.淋巴瘤患者的下一代监测策略。
Future Oncol. 2015;11(13):1977-91. doi: 10.2217/fon.15.92.
8
Species differences in tumour responses to cancer chemotherapy.肿瘤对癌症化疗反应的种属差异。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Jul 19;370(1673). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0233.
9
The use and effectiveness of rituximab maintenance in patients with follicular lymphoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2007 in the United States.美国 2004 年至 2007 年间诊断的滤泡性淋巴瘤患者中,利妥昔单抗维持治疗的应用和效果。
Cancer. 2014 Jun 15;120(12):1830-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28659. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
10
Initial management strategies for follicular lymphoma.滤泡性淋巴瘤的初始管理策略
Int J Hematol Oncol. 2012 Oct;1(1):35-45. doi: 10.2217/ijh.12.7.