Chen Jian Sheng, Simpson Judy M, Blyth Fiona M, March Lyn M
The Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Level 7C, Acute Services Building, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia.
Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Bone. 2014 Dec;69:148-53. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.09.015. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
Many people at high risk of fractures are not following traditional guidelines and not being recommended for intervention. This study aimed to propose and evaluate a new set of intervention thresholds.
Participants were 213,375 men and women aged ≥50 years living in New South Wales, Australia. Fracture Risk Assessment Paper Charts (Australia) was used to estimate the 10-year fracture risk. The standardized rates (to Australia population distribution 2007) for intervention were calculated for different thresholds: our proposed new thresholds (i.e. 10-year probability of hip fracture: ≥3%, 5% or 7% for 50-69, 70-79 and ≥80 years respectively), thresholds by the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) approach, UK thresholds and US thresholds.
The NOGG, UK and US thresholds did not work well in the Australian population. For example, the NOGG and UK thresholds respectively qualified only 1 in 12 (8.1%) and 1 in 9 (11.3%) Australian men aged ≥70 years and the US thresholds qualified about 9 in 10 (90.6%) Australian women aged ≥ 70 years. For men or women aged ≥70 years, our proposed new thresholds gave more realistic treatment rates of 21.6% for men and 70.5% for women. Compared to the current Australian guidelines (i.e. T-score ≤ -2.5 and age ≥ 70 years or a fragility fracture), our thresholds identified an additional 4.9% of men and 18.2% of women aged ≥ 70 years for treatment.
The proposed new thresholds could identify currently under-recognised high-risk individuals for treatment. It should be considered as a recommendation for osteoporosis management in Australia.
许多骨折高危人群未遵循传统指南,也未被推荐进行干预。本研究旨在提出并评估一套新的干预阈值。
研究对象为居住在澳大利亚新南威尔士州的213375名年龄≥50岁的男性和女性。使用骨折风险评估纸质图表(澳大利亚版)来估计10年骨折风险。针对不同阈值计算了干预的标准化率(以2007年澳大利亚人口分布为标准):我们提出的新阈值(即50 - 69岁、70 - 79岁和≥80岁人群的10年髋部骨折概率分别为≥3%、5%或7%)、国家骨质疏松症指南小组(NOGG)方法的阈值、英国阈值和美国阈值。
NOGG、英国和美国的阈值在澳大利亚人群中效果不佳。例如,NOGG和英国的阈值分别仅使12名澳大利亚≥70岁男性中的1名(8.1%)和9名澳大利亚≥70岁男性中的1名(11.3%)符合干预标准,而美国的阈值使约10名澳大利亚≥70岁女性中的9名(90.6%)符合干预标准。对于≥70岁的男性或女性,我们提出的新阈值给出了更现实的治疗率,男性为21.6%,女性为70.5%。与当前澳大利亚指南(即T值≤ -2.5且年龄≥70岁或有脆性骨折)相比,我们的阈值确定了另外4.9%的≥70岁男性和18.2%的≥70岁女性需要治疗。
提出的新阈值可以识别目前未被充分认识的高危治疗个体。应将其视为澳大利亚骨质疏松症管理的一项建议。