Department of Rehabilitation and Aged Care, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Neurological and Mental Health Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Feb;96(2):241-247.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
To provide an epidemiological perspective of the clinical profile, frequency, and determinants of poststroke hemiplegic shoulder pain.
A prospective population-based study of an inception cohort of participants with a 12-month follow-up period.
General community and hospital within a geographically defined metropolitan region.
Multiple ascertainment techniques were used to identify 318 confirmed stroke events in 301 individuals. Among adults with stroke, data on shoulder pain were available for 198 (83% of the survivors) at baseline and for 156 and 148 at 4 and 12 months, respectively.
Not applicable.
Subjective reports of onset, severity, and aggravating factors for pain and 3 passive range-of-motion measures were collected at baseline and at 4- and 12-month follow-up.
A total of 10% of the participants reported shoulder pain at baseline, whereas 21% reported pain at each follow-up assessment. Overall, 29% of all assessed participants reported shoulder pain during 12-month follow-up, with the median pain score (visual analog scale score=40) highest at 4 months and more often associated with movement at later time points. Objective passive range-of-motion tests elicited higher frequencies of pain than did self-report and predicted later subjective shoulder pain (crude relative risk of 3.22 [95% confidence interval, 1.01-10.27]).
The frequency of poststroke shoulder pain is almost 30%. Peak onset and severity of hemiplegic shoulder pain in this study was at 4 months, outside of rehabilitation admission time frames. Systematic use of objective assessment tools may aid in early identification and management of stroke survivors at risk of this common complication of stroke.
提供脑卒中后偏瘫肩痛的临床特征、发生率和决定因素的流行病学视角。
一项基于人口的前瞻性队列研究,对 12 个月的随访期内的参与者进行了研究。
地理上定义的大都市区内的普通社区和医院。
采用多种确定技术,在 301 名参与者中确定了 318 例确诊的脑卒中事件。在患有脑卒中的成年人中,在基线时有 198 人(幸存者的 83%)提供了肩部疼痛的数据,在 4 个月和 12 个月时,分别有 156 人和 148 人提供了肩部疼痛的数据。
不适用。
在基线时以及在 4 个月和 12 个月的随访时,收集疼痛的起始、严重程度和加重因素以及 3 种被动活动范围的主观报告。
在基线时,有 10%的参与者报告肩部疼痛,而在每次随访时,有 21%的参与者报告疼痛。总体而言,在 12 个月的随访期间,有 29%的所有评估参与者报告肩部疼痛,其中疼痛评分(视觉模拟评分=40)在 4 个月时最高,且更常与后期时间点的运动有关。客观的被动活动范围测试比自我报告更频繁地引发疼痛,并预测了以后的主观肩部疼痛(未经校正的相对风险为 3.22[95%置信区间,1.01-10.27])。
脑卒中后肩部疼痛的发生率接近 30%。在本研究中,偏瘫肩痛的发病高峰和严重程度出现在 4 个月,超出了康复入院的时间框架。系统使用客观评估工具可能有助于早期识别和管理有这种常见脑卒中并发症风险的脑卒中幸存者。