• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加利福尼亚州的医疗事故:既判力。

Surgical malpractice in California: res judicata.

作者信息

Barthel Erik R, Stabile Bruce E, Plurad David, Kim Dennis, Neville Angela, Bricker Scott, Putnam Brant, Bongard Fred

机构信息

Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Acute Care Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Torrance, California, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2014 Oct;80(10):1007-11.

PMID:25264649
Abstract

Medical negligence claims are of increasing concern to surgeons. Although noneconomic damage awards in California are limited by the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA) law to $250,000, the total amount of such settlements can increase significantly based on claims for economic damages. We reviewed negligence litigation involving California surgeons to determine outcomes and monetary awards through retrospective review of surgical malpractice cases published in a legal journal. This review was limited to actions involving general surgeons. Such litigation was voluntarily reported by either defense's or plaintiff's counsel at the conclusion of the litigation. Data reviewed included alleged damages incurred by the plaintiff; plaintiff's pretrial settlement demand, plaintiff or defense verdict, use of alternate means of resolution such as arbitration or mediation, and total monetary award to the plaintiff. A total of 69 cases were reported over a 20-month period: 32 (46%) were plaintiffs' verdicts, whereas 37 (54%) were in favor of the surgeon. Only 10 (31%) of the plaintiff verdicts were by jury trial, whereas the rest were settled by pretrial agreement, mediation, or arbitration. Of cases settled by alternate dispute resolution, the median settlement was $820,000 (n = 22) compared with a median jury trial award of $300,000 (n = 10).

摘要

医疗过失索赔越来越受到外科医生的关注。尽管加利福尼亚州的非经济损害赔偿受《医疗伤害赔偿改革法》(MICRA)限制,最高为25万美元,但基于经济损害索赔,此类和解的总金额可能会大幅增加。我们通过回顾一份法律期刊上发表的外科医疗事故案例,对涉及加利福尼亚州外科医生的过失诉讼进行了审查,以确定结果和金钱赔偿。这项审查仅限于涉及普通外科医生的诉讼。此类诉讼由辩护方或原告方律师在诉讼结束时自愿报告。审查的数据包括原告声称遭受的损害;原告的审前和解要求、原告或辩护方的裁决、是否使用仲裁或调解等替代解决方式,以及判给原告的总金钱赔偿。在20个月的时间里共报告了69起案件:32起(46%)是原告胜诉,而37起(54%)有利于外科医生。原告胜诉的案件中只有10起(31%)是通过陪审团审判,其余的通过审前协议、调解或仲裁解决。在通过替代争议解决方式解决的案件中,和解金额中位数为82万美元(n = 22),而陪审团审判裁决的中位数为30万美元(n = 10)。

相似文献

1
Surgical malpractice in California: res judicata.加利福尼亚州的医疗事故:既判力。
Am Surg. 2014 Oct;80(10):1007-11.
2
Malpractice litigation in elective lumbar spinal fusion: a comprehensive review of reported legal claims in the U.S. in the past 50 years.选择性腰椎融合术的医疗事故诉讼:对过去 50 年美国报告的法律索赔进行的全面综述。
Spine J. 2022 Aug;22(8):1254-1264. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.03.015. Epub 2022 Apr 3.
3
Malpractice Litigation in Pediatric Ophthalmology.小儿眼科医疗事故诉讼
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Nov 1;134(11):1230-1235. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.3190.
4
Descriptive Analysis of Federal and State Interventional Pain Malpractice Litigation in the United States: A Pilot Investigation.美国联邦和州干预性疼痛医疗过失诉讼的描述性分析:一项初步调查。
Pain Physician. 2020 Jul;23(4):413-422.
5
Malpractice litigation following spine surgery.脊柱手术后的医疗事故诉讼。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Oct;27(4):470-475. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.SPINE16646. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
6
Monetary lessons from litigation involving laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术相关诉讼中的金钱教训。
Am Surg. 2005 Jul;71(7):606-12.
7
Malpractice litigation after surgical injury of the spinal accessory nerve: an evidence-based analysis.副神经手术损伤后的医疗事故诉讼:基于证据的分析
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Jan;134(1):102-7. doi: 10.1001/archotol.134.1.102.
8
Litigation Following Carpal Tunnel Release.腕管松解术后的诉讼
Hand (N Y). 2019 Jul;14(4):466-470. doi: 10.1177/1558944718760032. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
9
Jury verdicts, outcomes, and tort reform features of malpractice cases involving thoracic outlet syndrome.涉及胸廓出口综合征的医疗事故案件的陪审团裁决、结果和侵权改革特征。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Mar;75(3):962-967. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.08.098. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
10
Sleep surgery and medical malpractice.睡眠手术与医疗事故。
Laryngoscope. 2014 Jun;124(6):E250-4. doi: 10.1002/lary.24559. Epub 2014 Jan 17.