O'Corry-Crowe Greg, Gelatt Tom, Rea Lorrie, Bonin Carolina, Rehberg Michael
Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute, Florida Atlantic University, 5600 U.S. 1 north, Fort Pierce, FL, 34946, USA; Southwest Fisheries Science Center, 8901 La Jolla Shores Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
Mol Ecol. 2014 Nov;23(22):5415-34. doi: 10.1111/mec.12944. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
Population growth typically involves range expansion and establishment of new breeding sites, while the opposite occurs during declines. Although density dependence is widely invoked in theoretical studies of emigration and colonization in expanding populations, few empirical studies have documented the mechanisms. Still fewer have documented the direction and mechanisms of individual transfer in declining populations. Here, we screen large numbers of pups sampled on their natal rookeries for variation in mtDNA (n = 1106) and 16 microsatellite loci (n = 588) and show that new Steller sea lion breeding sites did not follow the typical paradigm and were instead colonized by sea lions from both a declining (Endangered) population and an increasing population. Dispersing individuals colonized rookeries in the distributional hiatus between two evolutionarily distinct (Φ¯(st) = 0.222, R¯(st) = 0.053, K = 2) metapopulations recently described as separate subspecies. Hardy-Weinberg, mixed-stock and relatedness analysis revealed levels of interbreeding on the new rookeries that exclude (i) assortative mating among eastern and western forms, and (ii) inbreeding avoidance as primary motivations for dispersal. Positive and negative density dependence is implicated in both cases of individual transfer. Migration distance limits, and conspecific attraction and performance likely influenced the sequence of rookery colonizations. This study demonstrates that resource limitation may trigger an exodus of breeding animals from declining populations, with substantial impacts on distribution and patterns of genetic variation. It also revealed that this event is rare because colonists dispersed across an evolutionary boundary, suggesting that the causative factors behind recent declines are unusual or of larger magnitude than normally occur.
种群增长通常涉及分布范围的扩大和新繁殖地的建立,而在种群数量下降时则会出现相反的情况。尽管在理论研究中,密度依赖性在扩张种群的迁出和定殖过程中被广泛提及,但很少有实证研究记录其机制。记录种群数量下降时个体转移方向和机制的研究更少。在这里,我们对在其出生地繁殖地采集的大量幼崽进行了线粒体DNA(n = 1106)和16个微卫星位点(n = 588)的变异筛选,结果表明,新的北海狮繁殖地并不遵循典型模式,而是由来自数量下降(濒危)种群和数量增加种群的海狮定殖。扩散个体在两个最近被描述为不同亚种的进化上不同的(Φ¯(st) = 0.222,R¯(st) = 0.053,K = 2)集合种群之间的分布间隙中定殖繁殖地。哈迪-温伯格平衡、混合种群和相关性分析揭示了新繁殖地上的杂交水平排除了(i)东部和西部形态之间的选型交配,以及(ii)避免近亲繁殖作为扩散的主要动机。个体转移的两种情况都涉及正密度依赖性和负密度依赖性。迁移距离限制以及同种吸引和表现可能影响了繁殖地定殖的顺序。这项研究表明,资源限制可能引发繁殖动物从数量下降的种群中迁出,对分布和遗传变异模式产生重大影响。它还表明,这一事件很罕见,因为殖民者跨越了一个进化边界进行扩散,这表明近期数量下降背后的致病因素不寻常或比正常情况的规模更大。