Kapellusch Jay M, Gerr Frederic E, Malloy Elizabeth J, Garg Arun, Harris-Adamson Carisa, Bao Stephen S, Burt Susan E, Dale Ann Marie, Eisen Ellen A, Evanoff Bradley A, Hegmann Kurt T, Silverstein Barbara A, Theise Matthew S, Rempel David M
Department of Occupational Science & Technology University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, PO Box 413 Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2014 Nov;40(6):610-620. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3456. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
This paper aimed to quantify exposure-response relationships between the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists' (ACGIH) threshold limit value (TLV) for hand-activity level (HAL) and incidence of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).
Manufacturing and service workers previously studied by six research institutions had their data combined and re-analyzed. CTS cases were defined by symptoms and abnormal nerve conduction. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using proportional hazards regression after adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, and CTS predisposing conditions.
The longitudinal study comprised 2751 incident-eligible workers, followed prospectively for up to 6.4 years and contributing 6243 person-years of data. Associations were found between CTS and TLV for HAL both as a continuous variable [HR 1.32 per unit, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.11-1.57] and when categorized using the ACGIH action limit (AL) and TLV. Those between the AL and TLV and above the TLV had HR of 1.7 (95% CI 1.2-2.5) and 1.5 (95% CI 1.0-2.1), respectively. As independent variables (in the same adjusted model) the HR for peak force (PF) and HAL were 1.14 per unit (95% CI 1.05-1.25), and 1.04 per unit (95% CI 0.93-1.15), respectively.
Those with exposures above the AL were at increased risk of CTS, but there was no further increase in risk for workers above the TLV. This suggests that the current AL may not be sufficiently protective of workers. Combinations of PF and HAL are useful for predicting risk of CTS.
本文旨在量化美国政府工业卫生学家会议(ACGIH)手部活动水平(HAL)的阈限值(TLV)与腕管综合征(CTS)发病率之间的暴露-反应关系。
将六个研究机构先前研究的制造业和服务业工人的数据进行合并并重新分析。CTS病例通过症状和异常神经传导来定义。在对年龄、性别、体重指数和CTS易感因素进行调整后,使用比例风险回归计算风险比(HR)。
这项纵向研究包括2751名符合发病条件的工人,前瞻性随访长达6.4年,提供了6243人年的数据。CTS与HAL的TLV之间存在关联,HAL作为连续变量时[每单位HR为1.32,95%置信区间(95%CI)为1.11 - 1.57],以及使用ACGIH行动限值(AL)和TLV进行分类时均存在关联。处于AL和TLV之间以及高于TLV的人群的HR分别为1.7(95%CI为1.2 - 2.5)和1.5(95%CI为1.0 - 2.1)。作为自变量(在同一调整模型中),峰值力(PF)和HAL的HR分别为每单位1.14(95%CI为1.05 - 1.25)和每单位1.04(95%CI为0.93 - 1.15)。
暴露高于AL的人群患CTS的风险增加,但TLV以上的工人风险没有进一步增加。这表明当前的AL可能不足以保护工人。PF和HAL的组合有助于预测CTS风险。