Nash S, Luauté J, Bar J Y, Sancho P O, Hours M, Chossegros L, Tournier C, Charnay P, Mazaux J M, Boisson D
Université de Lyon, 69622 Lyon, France; Hôpital Henry-Gabrielle, hospices civils de Lyon, 69610 Pierre-Bénite, France; Université Lyon 1, 69373 Lyon, France; IFSTTAR, UMRESTTE, 69675 Bron, France; Université Lyon 1, UMRESTTE, 69373 Lyon, France.
Université de Lyon, 69622 Lyon, France; Hôpital Henry-Gabrielle, hospices civils de Lyon, 69610 Pierre-Bénite, France; Université Lyon 1, 69373 Lyon, France.
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2014 Dec;57(9-10):600-17. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2014.08.010. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
The variety and extent of impairments occurring after traumatic brain injury vary according to the nature and severity of the lesions. In order to better understand their interactions and long-term outcome, we have studied and compared the cognitive and neurobehavioral profile one year post onset of patients with and without traumatic brain injury in a cohort of motor vehicle accident victims.
The study population is composed of 207 seriously injured persons from the ESPARR cohort. This cohort, which has been followed up in time, consists in 1168 motor vehicle accident victims (aged 16 years or more) with injuries with all degrees of severity. Inclusion criteria were: living in Rhone county, victim of a traffic accident having involved at least one wheel-conducted vehicle and having occurred in Rhone county, alive at the time of arrival in hospital and having presented in one of the different ER facilities of the county. The cohort's representativeness regarding social and geographic criteria and the specificities of the accidents were ensured by the specific targeting of recruitment. Deficits and impairments were assessed one year after the accident using the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale - Revised and the Trail-Making Test. Within our seriously injured group, based on the Glasgow Score, the presence of neurological deficits, aggravation of neurological condition in the first 72hours and/or abnormal cerebral imaging, we identified three categories: (i) moderate/severe traumatic brain injury (n=48), (ii) mild traumatic brain injury (n=89), and (iii) severely injured but without traumatic brain injury (n=70).
The most frequently observed symptoms were anxiety, irritability, memory and attention impairments, depressive mood and emotional lability. While depressive mood and irritability were observed with similar frequency in all three groups, memory and attention impairments, anxiety and reduced initiative were more specific to traumatic brain injury whereas executive disorders were associated with moderate/severe traumatic brain injury.
DISCUSSION-CONCLUSION: The presence and the initial severity of a traumatic brain injury condition the nature and frequency of residual effects after one year. Some impairments such as irritability, which is generally associated with traumatic brain injury, do not appear to be specific to this population, nor does depressive mood. Substantial interactions between cognitive, affective and neurobehavioral disorders have been highlighted.
创伤性脑损伤后出现的损伤种类和程度因损伤的性质和严重程度而异。为了更好地理解它们之间的相互作用以及长期预后,我们对一组机动车事故受害者中创伤性脑损伤患者和非创伤性脑损伤患者发病一年后的认知和神经行为特征进行了研究和比较。
研究人群由ESPARR队列中的207名重伤者组成。该队列经过了长期随访,包括1168名不同严重程度受伤的机动车事故受害者(年龄16岁及以上)。纳入标准为:居住在罗纳县,涉及至少一辆轮式车辆的交通事故受害者且事故发生在罗纳县,入院时存活且在该县的不同急诊机构就诊过。通过特定的招募目标确保了该队列在社会和地理标准以及事故特殊性方面的代表性。事故发生一年后,使用修订后的神经行为评定量表和连线测验评估缺陷和损伤情况。在我们的重伤组中,根据格拉斯哥评分、神经功能缺损的存在情况、最初72小时内神经状况的恶化和/或脑部影像学异常,我们确定了三类:(i)中度/重度创伤性脑损伤(n = 48),(ii)轻度创伤性脑损伤(n = 89),以及(iii)重伤但无创伤性脑损伤(n = 70)。
最常观察到的症状是焦虑、易怒、记忆和注意力障碍、抑郁情绪和情绪不稳定。虽然在所有三组中抑郁情绪和易怒的出现频率相似,但记忆和注意力障碍、焦虑和主动性降低更具创伤性脑损伤的特异性,而执行功能障碍与中度/重度创伤性脑损伤相关。
讨论 - 结论:创伤性脑损伤的存在及其初始严重程度决定了一年后残留影响的性质和频率。一些损伤,如通常与创伤性脑损伤相关的易怒,似乎并非该人群所特有,抑郁情绪也是如此。认知、情感和神经行为障碍之间的实质性相互作用已得到凸显。