Leménager Tagrid, Hill Holger, Reinhard Iris, Hoffmann Sabine, Zimmermann Ulrich S, Hermann Derik, Smolka Michael N, Kiefer Falk, Vollstädt-Klein Sabine, Heinz Andreas, Mann Karl
Department of Addictive Behavior and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, J5, D-68159 Mannheim, Germany.
Department of Addictive Behavior and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, J5, D-68159 Mannheim, Germany; Institute for Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Hertzstraße 16, Geb. 06.31, D-76187 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2014 Dec;94(3):263-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.09.009. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
Previous research on alcohol dependent patients has shown that variations in eyeblink startle response can be used as an indicator of their emotional responses to alcohol-related stimuli. Postulating that reactions on substance associated stimuli are controlled by either a negative or a positive affective processing system, we expect that abstinent alcoholics react differently (within-group) in the emotional evaluation of alcohol cues. Furthermore, we assumed the startle response to covary with medication response to acamprosate and naltrexone. We measured 74 detoxified inpatients' acoustic startle responses while they were being presented with alcohol-related images as well as affectively negative, neutral, and positive pictures before they were randomized to pharmacotherapy. Group-mean startle peak amplitudes were lowest for alcohol-related cues. The relative startle response (alcohol cues set in relation to the other stimulus categories) did not correlate with craving for alcohol (OCDS) or alcohol cue induced self-ratings of arousal, valence and craving. Patients with a lower percentage of abstinent days in the 90 days prior to the last drinking day showed a lower ("more appetitive") startle response to alcohol cues. A survival analysis using the time to first heavy drinking day as the survival criterion revealed a significant interaction between alcohol-cue startle responses and medication type. The results indicate that the psycho-physiological measure of emotional evaluation of alcohol cues includes unconscious processing not reflected by conscious self-ratings. Furthermore, our result of a differential medication effect may encourage further studies to use biological characteristics to stratify patients as a step towards individualized treatment for alcohol dependence.
先前对酒精依赖患者的研究表明,眨眼惊跳反应的变化可作为他们对酒精相关刺激的情绪反应指标。假设对物质相关刺激的反应由消极或积极情感加工系统控制,我们预期戒酒的酗酒者在对酒精线索的情绪评估中(组内)反应不同。此外,我们假设惊跳反应与对阿坎酸和纳曲酮的药物反应共变。在74名已脱毒的住院患者被随机分配接受药物治疗之前,我们测量了他们在观看酒精相关图像以及情感消极、中性和积极图片时的听觉惊跳反应。与酒精相关线索相比,组平均惊跳峰值幅度最低。相对惊跳反应(与其他刺激类别相关的酒精线索)与对酒精的渴望(强迫性饮酒量表)或酒精线索诱发的对唤醒、效价和渴望的自我评分无关。在最后饮酒日之前的90天内戒酒天数比例较低的患者,对酒精线索的惊跳反应较低(“更有欲望”)。以首次大量饮酒日的时间作为生存标准的生存分析显示,酒精线索惊跳反应与药物类型之间存在显著交互作用。结果表明,对酒精线索情绪评估的心理生理测量包括有意识自我评分未反映的无意识加工。此外,我们关于药物效果差异的结果可能会鼓励进一步的研究利用生物学特征对患者进行分层,作为迈向酒精依赖个体化治疗的一步。