• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宫颈三角吻合器吻合术在微创食管癌切除术中的应用

[Application of cervical triangulating stapled anastomosis in minimally invasive esophagectomy].

作者信息

Tan Lijie, Feng Mingxiang, Shen Yaxing, Wang Hao, Li Jingpei, Xi Yong, Wang Qun

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Sep;17(9):869-71.

PMID:25273652
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the safety and feasibility of cervical triangulating stapled anastomosis(TSA) for esophagogastric anastomosis(EGA) after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE).

METHODS

Clinical data of 137 patients undergoing MIE for esophageal cancer(EC) in our department from January 2013 to March 2014 using end to side circular stapled anastomosis (CSA, 60 cases) or end-to-end triangulating stapled anastomosis (TSA, 77 cases) in the neck were retrospectively analyzed. The short-term outcomes between the two groups were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

Cervical anastomotic leakage occurred in 3 patients(3.9%) of TSA group, but in six(10.0%) of CSA group (P=0.152). The incidence of anastomotic stenosis was 1.3%(1/77) and 15.0%(9/60) in TSA and CSA group respectively(P=0.002). The median hospital stay and perioperative mortality were not significantly different between the two groups as well as postoperative respiratory and cardiovascular complications.

CONCLUSIONS

TSA is a safely and effectively alternative method for EGA with lower incidence of postoperative gastrointestinal complications, especially in anastomotic stricture.

摘要

目的

探讨在微创食管癌切除术后行食管胃吻合术时采用颈部三角形吻合器吻合术(TSA)的安全性和可行性。

方法

回顾性分析2013年1月至2014年3月在我科接受微创食管癌切除术的137例患者的临床资料,其中60例行颈部端端圆形吻合器吻合术(CSA),77例行颈部端端三角形吻合器吻合术(TSA)。对两组的短期结局进行评估和比较。

结果

TSA组有3例(3.9%)发生颈部吻合口漏,而CSA组有6例(10.0%)发生(P = 0.152)。TSA组和CSA组的吻合口狭窄发生率分别为1.3%(1/77)和15.0%(9/60)(P = 0.002)。两组的中位住院时间、围手术期死亡率以及术后呼吸和心血管并发症方面无显著差异。

结论

TSA是食管胃吻合术的一种安全有效的替代方法,术后胃肠道并发症发生率较低,尤其是吻合口狭窄。

相似文献

1
[Application of cervical triangulating stapled anastomosis in minimally invasive esophagectomy].宫颈三角吻合器吻合术在微创食管癌切除术中的应用
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Sep;17(9):869-71.
2
[Comparison of the stapled suture with the manual suture in the application of minimally invasive esophagectomy].吻合器缝合与手工缝合在微创食管切除术应用中的比较
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Sep;17(9):881-3.
3
[Application of gastroepiploic tunnel esophagogastrostomy in minimally invasive esophagectomy].胃网膜隧道式食管胃吻合术在微创食管切除术中的应用
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 25;19(9):1021-1024.
4
A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.临床实践中的一项改变:部分吻合器吻合的颈段食管胃吻合术可降低食管癌切除术后的发病率并改善功能结局。
Dis Esophagus. 2008;21(5):422-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00792.x.
5
Improved Functional Results After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Intrathoracic Versus Cervical Anastomosis.微创食管切除术后功能结果的改善:胸内吻合与颈部吻合的比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Jan;103(1):267-273. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
6
Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.食管癌颈部吻合术的微创与开放食管切除术比较:一项回顾性研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jun 8;15(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01182-3.
7
Outcomes of cervical end-to-side triangulating esophagogastric anastomosis with minimally invasive esophagectomy.微创食管切除术中采用颈端端三角化食管胃吻合术的效果
World J Surg. 2015 May;39(5):1099-104. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2925-0.
8
A comparison of cervical delta-shaped anastomosis and circular stapled anastomosis after esophagectomy.食管癌切除术后颈段三角形吻合与圆形吻合器吻合的比较。
World J Surg Oncol. 2017 Jan 19;15(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1097-4.
9
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Utilizing a Stapled Side-to-Side Anastomosis is Safe in the Western Patient Population.在西方患者群体中,采用吻合器侧侧吻合的微创食管切除术是安全的。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Sep;23(9):3056-62. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5232-1. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
10
Circular stapling versus triangulating stapling for the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.胸段食管癌患者食管切除术后颈段食管胃吻合术中圆形吻合器与三角形吻合器的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验
Surgery. 2017 Jul;162(1):131-138. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.01.013. Epub 2017 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of reversely connecting circular stapler technique in cervical esophagogastric anastomosis.反穿刺圆形吻合器技术在颈段食管胃吻合术中的应用
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023 Jun;18(2):279-286. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2023.125604. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
2
Which Anastomotic Techniques Is the Best Choice for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.食管癌切除术中颈部食管胃吻合术的最佳吻合技术选择是哪一种?一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Feb;27(2):422-432. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05482-y. Epub 2022 Nov 22.