Suppr超能文献

患者在无行为能力期间治疗决策的优先事项:定量调查

Patients' priorities for treatment decision making during periods of incapacity: quantitative survey.

作者信息

Rid Annette, Wesley Robert, Pavlick Mark, Maynard Sharon, Roth Katalin, Wendler David

机构信息

Department of Social Science,Health & Medicine, King's College London,London,United Kingdom.

Biostatistics & Clinical Epidemiology Service,The Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health,Bethesda,Maryland.

出版信息

Palliat Support Care. 2015 Oct;13(5):1165-83. doi: 10.1017/S1478951514001096. Epub 2014 Oct 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Clinical practice aims to respect patient autonomy by basing treatment decisions for incapacitated patients on their own preferences. Yet many patients do not complete an advance directive, and those who do frequently just designate a family member to make decisions for them. This finding raises the concern that clinical practice may be based on a mistaken understanding of patient priorities. The present study aimed to collect systematic data on how patients prioritize the goals of treatment decision making.

METHOD

We employed a self-administered, quantitative survey of patients in a tertiary care center.

RESULTS

Some 80% or more of the 1169 respondents (response rate = 59.8%) ranked six of eight listed goals for treatment decision making as important. When asked which goal was most important, 38.8% identified obtaining desired or avoiding unwanted treatments, 20.0% identified minimizing stress or financial burden on their family, and 14.6% identified having their family help to make treatment decisions. No single goal was designated as most important by 25.0% of participants.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

Patients endorsed three primary goals with respect to decision making during periods of incapacity: being treated consistent with their own preferences; minimizing the burden on their family; and involving their family in the decision-making process. However, no single goal was prioritized by a clear majority of patients. These findings suggest that advance care planning should not be limited to documenting patients' treatment preferences. Clinicians should also discuss and document patients' priorities for how decisions are to be made. Moreover, future research should evaluate ways to modify current practice to promote all three of patients primary goals for treatment decision making.

摘要

目的

临床实践旨在通过根据无行为能力患者自身的偏好来做出治疗决策,从而尊重患者的自主权。然而,许多患者并未完成预先指示,而那些完成预先指示的患者通常只是指定一名家庭成员为他们做出决策。这一发现引发了人们对临床实践可能基于对患者优先事项的错误理解的担忧。本研究旨在收集有关患者如何对治疗决策目标进行优先级排序的系统数据。

方法

我们对一家三级护理中心的患者进行了一项自我管理的定量调查。

结果

在1169名受访者中(回复率 = 59.8%),约80%或更多的人将列出的八个治疗决策目标中的六个列为重要目标。当被问及哪个目标最重要时,38.8%的人认为是获得期望的治疗或避免不想要的治疗,20.0%的人认为是减轻家人的压力或经济负担,14.6%的人认为是让家人帮助做出治疗决策。没有一个目标被25.0%的参与者指定为最重要的目标。

结果的意义

患者认可在无行为能力期间决策的三个主要目标:按照自己的偏好接受治疗;减轻家人的负担;让家人参与决策过程。然而,没有一个目标被绝大多数患者优先考虑。这些发现表明,预先护理计划不应仅限于记录患者的治疗偏好。临床医生还应讨论并记录患者在决策方式上的优先事项。此外,未来的研究应评估如何修改当前实践以促进患者治疗决策的所有三个主要目标。

相似文献

3
Systematic review: Individuals' goals for surrogate decision-making.系统评价:代理人决策的个体目标。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 May;60(5):884-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03937.x. Epub 2012 Apr 3.

本文引用的文献

1
What should be the goal of advance care planning?预先护理计划的目标应该是什么?
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jul;174(7):1093-4. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.1887.
9
Shaping end-of-life care: behavioral economics and advance directives.塑造临终关怀:行为经济学与预立医疗指示
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Aug;33(4):393-400. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1322403. Epub 2012 Aug 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验