Fu Chih-Yuan, Yang Shang-Ju, Liao Chien-Hung, Lin Being-Chuan, Kang Shih-Ching, Wang Shang-Yu, Yuan Kuo-Ching, Ouyang Chun-Hsiang, Hsu Yu-Pao
Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Kwei Shan Township, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Injury. 2015 Jan;46(1):29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.052. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
Computed tomography (CT) scans have been used worldwide to evaluate patients with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT). However, CT scans have traditionally been considered to be a part of a secondary survey that can only be performed after the patient's haemodynamics have stabilised. In this study, we attempted to evaluate the role of the CT scan in managing BAT patients with hypotension.
Patients who fulfilled the criteria for a major torso injury in our institution were treated according to the Advanced Trauma Life Support guidelines. The selection of diagnostic modalities for patients with stable and unstable haemodynamics was discussed. Furthermore, patients with hypotension after resuscitation who were administered haemostasis procedures were the focus of our analysis. We also delineated the influence of CT scans on the time interval between arrival and definitive treatment for these patients.
During the study period, 909 patients were enrolled in this study. Ninety-one patients (10.0%, 91/909) had a systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90mmHg after resuscitation. Fifty-eight of the patients (63.7%) received CT scans before they received definitive treatment. There was no significant difference in the CT scan application rate between the patients with and without hypotension after resuscitation (63.7% vs. 68.8%, p=0.382). Among the 79 patients with hypotension after resuscitation who underwent a haemostasis procedure (surgery or angioembolisation), there was no significant difference in the time between arrival and definitive haemostasis between the patients who received CT scans and those who did not (surgery: 57.8 (standard deviation (SD) 6.4) vs. 61.6 (SD 14.5)min, p=0.218; angioembolisation: [147.0 (SD 33.4) vs. 139.3 (SD 16.7)min, p=0.093).
The traditional priority of diagnostic modalities used to manage BAT patients should be reconsidered because of advancements in facilities and understanding of BAT. With shorter scanning times and transportation distances, hypotension does not always make performing a CT scan unfeasible.
计算机断层扫描(CT)已在全球范围内用于评估钝性腹部创伤(BAT)患者。然而,传统上CT扫描被视为二级检查的一部分,只能在患者血流动力学稳定后进行。在本研究中,我们试图评估CT扫描在处理低血压BAT患者中的作用。
符合我院严重躯干损伤标准的患者按照高级创伤生命支持指南进行治疗。讨论了血流动力学稳定和不稳定患者诊断方式的选择。此外,复苏后低血压且接受止血治疗的患者是我们分析的重点。我们还描述了CT扫描对这些患者到达与确定性治疗之间时间间隔的影响。
在研究期间,909例患者纳入本研究。91例患者(10.0%,91/909)复苏后收缩压(SBP)<90mmHg。其中58例患者(63.7%)在接受确定性治疗前接受了CT扫描。复苏后有低血压和无低血压患者的CT扫描应用率无显著差异(63.7%对68.8%,p = 0.382)。在79例复苏后低血压且接受止血治疗(手术或血管栓塞)的患者中,接受CT扫描和未接受CT扫描的患者到达与确定性止血之间的时间无显著差异(手术:57.8(标准差(SD)6.4)对61.6(SD 14.5)分钟,p = 0.218;血管栓塞:[147.0(SD 33.4)对139.3(SD 16.7)分钟,p = 0.093])。
由于设备的进步和对BAT认识的提高,应重新考虑用于处理BAT患者的诊断方式的传统优先级。随着扫描时间和转运距离的缩短,低血压并不总是使CT扫描不可行。