• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

组织环境管理决策的证据:一个“4S”层次结构。

Organising evidence for environmental management decisions: a '4S' hierarchy.

机构信息

Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.

Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.

出版信息

Trends Ecol Evol. 2014 Nov;29(11):607-13. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.tree.2014.09.004
PMID:25280588
Abstract

Making decisions informed by the best-available science is an objective for many organisations managing the environment or natural resources. Yet, available science is still not widely used in environmental policy and practice. We describe a '4S' hierarchy for organising relevant science to inform decisions. This hierarchy has already revolutionised clinical practice. It is beginning to emerge for environmental management, although all four levels need substantial development before environmental decision-makers can reliably and efficiently find the evidence they need. We expose common bypass routes that currently lead to poor or biased representation of scientific knowledge. We argue that the least developed level of the hierarchy is that closest to decision-makers, placing synthesised scientific knowledge into environmental decision support systems.

摘要

许多管理环境或自然资源的组织都以利用最佳可得科学信息为决策目标。然而,现有的科学信息在环境政策和实践中的应用还不够广泛。我们描述了一个“4S”层次结构,用于组织相关科学信息以辅助决策。该层次结构已经彻底改变了临床实践。尽管在环境决策者能够可靠且高效地找到所需证据之前,还需要对所有四个层次进行大量开发,但它已经开始应用于环境管理领域。我们揭示了目前导致科学知识代表性差或有偏见的常见捷径。我们认为,层次结构中最不发达的层次是最接近决策者的层次,即将综合科学知识纳入环境决策支持系统。

相似文献

1
Organising evidence for environmental management decisions: a '4S' hierarchy.组织环境管理决策的证据:一个“4S”层次结构。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2014 Nov;29(11):607-13. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
2
A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science-practice gap in ecology and conservation.理解生态学和保护学中科学实践差距成因观点的概念框架。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018 May;93(2):1032-1055. doi: 10.1111/brv.12385. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
3
Exploring Institutional Mechanisms for Scientific Input into the Management Cycle of the National Protected Area Network of Peru: Gaps and Opportunities.探索秘鲁国家保护区网络管理周期科学投入的制度机制:差距与机遇
Environ Manage. 2017 Dec;60(6):1022-1041. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0929-x. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
4
Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge-action boundary.实现连接知识与行动边界的保护科学。
Conserv Biol. 2013 Aug;27(4):669-78. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12050. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
5
Material witness: Towards a materials ecology.重要见证:迈向材料生态学
Nat Mater. 2003 Dec;2(12):781. doi: 10.1038/nmat1024.
6
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
7
Better environmental decision making - recent progress and future trends.更好的环境决策——近期进展与未来趋势。
Sci Total Environ. 2008 Aug 1;400(1-3):20-31. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.07.022. Epub 2008 Sep 6.
8
Revisiting the rationale for holistic, integrated risk assessments.重新审视整体综合风险评估的基本原理。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2010 Oct;6(4):774-6. doi: 10.1002/ieam.107.
9
Guidelines for Using Movement Science to Inform Biodiversity Policy.利用运动科学为生物多样性政策提供信息的指南。
Environ Manage. 2015 Oct;56(4):791-801. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0570-5. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
10
Aggregating sustainability indicators: beyond the weighted sum.汇总可持续性指标:超越加权总和。
J Environ Manage. 2012 Nov 30;111:24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Ten facts from critical and interpretive social sciences for environmental research.批判性与诠释性社会科学为环境研究提供的十个事实。
iScience. 2025 May 23;28(6):112736. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112736. eCollection 2025 Jun 20.
2
Systematic map of recent evidence on reproductive performance of cattle in Africa.非洲牛群生殖性能近期证据的系统图谱。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2024 Jul 22;56(7):218. doi: 10.1007/s11250-024-04074-z.
3
How to optimize the systematic review process using AI tools.如何使用人工智能工具优化系统评价过程。
JCPP Adv. 2024 Apr 23;4(2):e12234. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12234. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Animal Feed Formulation-Connecting Technologies to Build a Resilient and Sustainable System.动物饲料配方——连接技术构建有韧性且可持续的系统。
Animals (Basel). 2024 May 17;14(10):1497. doi: 10.3390/ani14101497.
5
Ten principles for generating accessible and useable COVID-19 environmental science and a fit-for-purpose evidence base.生成可获取且可用的新冠疫情环境科学及适用证据库的十条原则。
Ecol Solut Evid. 2021 Jan-Mar;2(1):e12041. doi: 10.1002/2688-8319.12041. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
6
Institutional roles, structures, funding and research partnerships towards evidence-informed policy-making: a multisector survey among policy-makers in Nigeria.机构角色、结构、资金和研究伙伴关系对循证决策的影响:尼日利亚政策制定者的多部门调查。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 May 26;21(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-00971-1.
7
Environmental evidence in action: on the science and practice of evidence synthesis and evidence-based decision-making.实际中的环境证据:论证据综合与循证决策的科学与实践
Environ Evid. 2023;12(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13750-023-00302-5. Epub 2023 May 18.
8
Systematic map of the most recent evidence (2010-2019) on ruminant production-limiting disease prevalence and associated mortality in Ethiopia.关于埃塞俄比亚反刍动物生产限制疾病流行率及相关死亡率的最新证据(2010 - 2019年)的系统图谱。
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Feb 3;10:995213. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.995213. eCollection 2023.
9
A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies.闪光未必耀眼:临界融合频率的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 30;17(12):e0279718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279718. eCollection 2022.
10
Evidence-Based Recommendations for Herd Health Management of Porcine Post-Weaning Diarrhea.猪断奶后腹泻群体健康管理的循证推荐
Animals (Basel). 2022 Jul 6;12(14):1737. doi: 10.3390/ani12141737.