Choi Il Ju, Lee Jun Ho, Kim Young-Il, Kim Chan Gyoo, Cho Soo-Jeong, Lee Jong Yeul, Ryu Keun Won, Nam Byung-Ho, Kook Myeong-Cherl, Kim Young-Woo
Center for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Center for Clinical Trials, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Feb;81(2):333-41.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.047. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
Endoscopic resection (ER) of early gastric cancer (EGC) meeting the absolute indication has excellent long-term outcomes.
To compare long-term outcomes of ER with those of surgery in patients with EGC who met the absolute indication for ER.
Retrospective cohort study.
A specialized center for the treatment of cancer.
We retrospectively reviewed data from patients who underwent gastrectomy or ER for EGC between 2002 and 2007. Gastric cancers were differentiated-type adenocarcinoma without ulceration confined to the mucosal layer and 2 cm or smaller in size.
The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Metachronous cancer rates and adverse event rates were compared. Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were applied for comparisons. Differences in baseline characteristics were adjusted by propensity score.
Among 375 patients, 261 underwent ER and 114 underwent surgery. The median follow-up duration was 76.4 months. The 5-year OS rates did not significantly differ between the ER and surgery groups (95.7% vs 93.6%, respectively; P = .725 by log-rank test). There were no gastric cancer-related deaths in either group. Metachronous gastric cancer developed more frequently in the ER group (6.1%, 16/261) than in the surgery group (0.9%, 1/114) (P = .024). However, most patients (93.8%, 15/16) in the ER group were curatively treated with repeat ER. Adverse event rates were higher in the surgery group than those in the ER group (7.9% vs 2.7%, P = .028).
Retrospective, single-center study.
The OS rate after ER for mucosal gastric cancer that met the absolute indication was comparable to that achieved with surgery. Although metachronous cancers were more common after ER, they were usually treatable and did not affect survival.
符合绝对适应症的早期胃癌(EGC)内镜切除术(ER)具有出色的长期疗效。
比较符合ER绝对适应症的EGC患者中ER与手术的长期疗效。
回顾性队列研究。
一家癌症专科医院。
我们回顾性分析了2002年至2007年间因EGC接受胃切除术或ER的患者的数据。胃癌为无溃疡的分化型腺癌,局限于黏膜层,大小为2 cm或更小。
主要结局为总生存期(OS)。比较异时性癌发生率和不良事件发生率。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线和Cox比例风险回归分析进行比较。通过倾向评分调整基线特征的差异。
375例患者中,261例行ER,114例行手术。中位随访时间为76.4个月。ER组和手术组的5年OS率无显著差异(分别为95.7%和93.6%;对数秩检验P = 0.725)。两组均无胃癌相关死亡。ER组异时性胃癌的发生率(6.1%,16/261)高于手术组(0.9%,1/114)(P = 0.024)。然而,ER组的大多数患者(93.8%,15/16)通过重复ER得到了根治性治疗。手术组的不良事件发生率高于ER组(7.9%对2.7%,P = 0.028)。
回顾性单中心研究。
符合绝对适应症的黏膜性胃癌ER后的OS率与手术相当。虽然ER后异时性癌更常见,但通常可治疗且不影响生存。