Suppr超能文献

早期胃癌内镜切除与手术治疗的长期疗效比较:符合内镜切除绝对指征的病例分析

Long-term outcome comparison of endoscopic resection and surgery in early gastric cancer meeting the absolute indication for endoscopic resection.

作者信息

Choi Il Ju, Lee Jun Ho, Kim Young-Il, Kim Chan Gyoo, Cho Soo-Jeong, Lee Jong Yeul, Ryu Keun Won, Nam Byung-Ho, Kook Myeong-Cherl, Kim Young-Woo

机构信息

Center for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.

Center for Clinical Trials, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Feb;81(2):333-41.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.047. Epub 2014 Oct 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic resection (ER) of early gastric cancer (EGC) meeting the absolute indication has excellent long-term outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To compare long-term outcomes of ER with those of surgery in patients with EGC who met the absolute indication for ER.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A specialized center for the treatment of cancer.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

We retrospectively reviewed data from patients who underwent gastrectomy or ER for EGC between 2002 and 2007. Gastric cancers were differentiated-type adenocarcinoma without ulceration confined to the mucosal layer and 2 cm or smaller in size.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Metachronous cancer rates and adverse event rates were compared. Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were applied for comparisons. Differences in baseline characteristics were adjusted by propensity score.

RESULTS

Among 375 patients, 261 underwent ER and 114 underwent surgery. The median follow-up duration was 76.4 months. The 5-year OS rates did not significantly differ between the ER and surgery groups (95.7% vs 93.6%, respectively; P = .725 by log-rank test). There were no gastric cancer-related deaths in either group. Metachronous gastric cancer developed more frequently in the ER group (6.1%, 16/261) than in the surgery group (0.9%, 1/114) (P = .024). However, most patients (93.8%, 15/16) in the ER group were curatively treated with repeat ER. Adverse event rates were higher in the surgery group than those in the ER group (7.9% vs 2.7%, P = .028).

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective, single-center study.

CONCLUSIONS

The OS rate after ER for mucosal gastric cancer that met the absolute indication was comparable to that achieved with surgery. Although metachronous cancers were more common after ER, they were usually treatable and did not affect survival.

摘要

背景

符合绝对适应症的早期胃癌(EGC)内镜切除术(ER)具有出色的长期疗效。

目的

比较符合ER绝对适应症的EGC患者中ER与手术的长期疗效。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

一家癌症专科医院。

患者与干预措施

我们回顾性分析了2002年至2007年间因EGC接受胃切除术或ER的患者的数据。胃癌为无溃疡的分化型腺癌,局限于黏膜层,大小为2 cm或更小。

主要观察指标

主要结局为总生存期(OS)。比较异时性癌发生率和不良事件发生率。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线和Cox比例风险回归分析进行比较。通过倾向评分调整基线特征的差异。

结果

375例患者中,261例行ER,114例行手术。中位随访时间为76.4个月。ER组和手术组的5年OS率无显著差异(分别为95.7%和93.6%;对数秩检验P = 0.725)。两组均无胃癌相关死亡。ER组异时性胃癌的发生率(6.1%,16/261)高于手术组(0.9%,1/114)(P = 0.024)。然而,ER组的大多数患者(93.8%,15/16)通过重复ER得到了根治性治疗。手术组的不良事件发生率高于ER组(7.9%对2.7%,P = 0.028)。

局限性

回顾性单中心研究。

结论

符合绝对适应症的黏膜性胃癌ER后的OS率与手术相当。虽然ER后异时性癌更常见,但通常可治疗且不影响生存。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验