Jaiswal Abhishek Kumar, Bal Chandrasekhar, Damle Nishikant Avinash, Ballal Sanjana, Goswami Ravinder, Hari Smriti, Kumar Praveen
Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Department of Endocrinology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Sep;18(5):648-54. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.139222.
Two approaches are used to treat Graves' disease with radioiodine ((131)I)-the fixed dose approach and the other based on dosimetry. A prospective study was performed to compare the results of these two approaches in a randomized patient population, as such study is lacking in the Indian population till date.
Patients with Graves' disease were randomized into two groups: (1) Fixed dose group and the (2) Calculated dose group, each comprising of 20 patients. All the patients underwent detailed clinical and biochemical evaluation. Thyroid mass was determined by high resolution ultrasound machine with linear transducer of 7-11 MHz. Patients were given 185-370 kBq (5-10 uCi) of (131)I and 24 hr radioiodine uptake (RAIU) was calculated using thyroid uptake probe and thyroid phantom. Fixed dose group patients were administered 185MBq of (131)I. Calculated dose group patients were given (131)I as per the following formula: Calculated dose = [3700 kBq/g × estimated thyroid wt. (g)] ÷ 24 hr RAIU (%). Success of first dose of radioiodine was defined as clinically/biochemically euthyroid/hypothyroid status at the end of 3 months without the need for further therapy.
In the fixed dose group, eight patients were hyperthyroid, four were euthyroid, and eight were hypothyroid after the first dose at 3 months. Success rate of first dose was 60%. In calculated dose group, seven patients were hyperthyroid, eight were euthyroid, and five were hypothyroid. Success rate of first dose was 65%.
There is no statistically significant difference between the success rates of the two methods at 3 months. Hence, fixed dose approach may be used for treatment of Graves' disease as it is simple and convenient for the patient. Longer follow-up with higher number of patients should be done to confirm or contradict our findings.
放射性碘(¹³¹I)治疗格雷夫斯病有两种方法,即固定剂量法和基于剂量测定法。进行了一项前瞻性研究,在随机分组的患者群体中比较这两种方法的治疗结果,因为迄今为止印度人群中缺乏此类研究。
格雷夫斯病患者被随机分为两组:(1)固定剂量组和(2)计算剂量组,每组各20例患者。所有患者均接受了详细的临床和生化评估。使用7 - 11 MHz线性探头的高分辨率超声仪测定甲状腺大小。给患者服用185 - 370 kBq(5 - 10 μCi)的¹³¹I,并使用甲状腺摄取探头和甲状腺模型计算24小时放射性碘摄取率(RAIU)。固定剂量组患者服用185 MBq的¹³¹I。计算剂量组患者按以下公式服用¹³¹I:计算剂量 = [3700 kBq/g × 估计甲状腺重量(g)] ÷ 24小时RAIU(%)。首次放射性碘治疗成功的定义为3个月末临床/生化指标处于甲状腺功能正常/减退状态,且无需进一步治疗。
在固定剂量组,3个月时首次服药后8例患者为甲状腺功能亢进,4例为甲状腺功能正常,8例为甲状腺功能减退。首次剂量的成功率为60%。在计算剂量组,7例患者为甲状腺功能亢进,8例为甲状腺功能正常,5例为甲状腺功能减退。首次剂量的成功率为65%。
3个月时两种方法的成功率无统计学显著差异。因此,固定剂量法可用于格雷夫斯病的治疗,因为它对患者来说简单方便。应进行更多患者的更长时间随访以证实或反驳我们的发现。