• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病患者用药过量

Medication oversupply in patients with diabetes.

作者信息

Thorpe Carolyn T, Johnson Heather, Dopp Anna Legreid, Thorpe Joshua M, Ronk Katie, Everett Christine M, Palta Mari, Mott David A, Chewning Betty, Schleiden Loren, Smith Maureen A

机构信息

Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, University Drive (151C), Building 30, Pittsburgh, PA 15240-1001, USA; Department of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, University of Pittsburgh, 3501 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.

Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, 800 University Bay Drive, Suite 210, Madison, WI 53705, USA.

出版信息

Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015 May-Jun;11(3):382-400. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.09.002
PMID:25288448
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4362914/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies in integrated health systems suggest that patients often accumulate oversupplies of prescribed medications, which is associated with higher costs and hospitalization risk. However, predictors of oversupply are poorly understood, with no studies in Medicare Part D.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe prevalence and predictors of oversupply of antidiabetic, antihypertensive, and antihyperlipidemic medications in adults with diabetes managed by a large, multidisciplinary, academic physician group and enrolled in Medicare Part D or a local private health plan.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study. Electronic health record data were linked to medical and pharmacy claims and enrollment data from Medicare and a local private payer for 2006-2008 to construct a patient-quarter dataset for patients managed by the physician group. Patients' quarterly refill adherence was calculated using ReComp, a continuous, multiple-interval measure of medication acquisition (CMA), and categorized as <0.80 = Undersupply, 0.80-1.20 = Appropriate Supply, >1.20 = Oversupply. We examined associations of baseline and time-varying predisposing, enabling, and medical need factors to quarterly supply using multinomial logistic regression.

RESULTS

The sample included 2519 adults with diabetes. Relative to patients with private insurance, higher odds of oversupply were observed in patients aged <65 in Medicare (OR = 3.36, 95% CI = 1.61-6.99), patients 65+ in Medicare (OR = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.37-4.60), patients <65 in Medicare/Medicaid (OR = 4.55, 95% CI = 2.33-8.92), and patients 65+ in Medicare/Medicaid (OR = 5.73, 95% CI = 2.89-11.33). Other factors associated with higher odds of oversupply included any 90-day refills during the quarter, psychotic disorder diagnosis, and moderate versus tight glycemic control.

CONCLUSIONS

Oversupply was less prevalent than in previous studies of integrated systems, but Medicare Part D enrollees had greater odds of oversupply than privately insured individuals. Future research should examine utilization management practices of Part D versus private health plans that may affect oversupply.

摘要

背景

对综合医疗系统的研究表明,患者常常会积累过量的处方药,这与更高的成本和住院风险相关。然而,过量供应的预测因素却鲜为人知,医疗保险D部分(Medicare Part D)尚无相关研究。

目的

本研究旨在描述由一个大型多学科学术医师团队管理并参加医疗保险D部分或当地私人健康保险计划的成年糖尿病患者中,抗糖尿病、抗高血压和抗高血脂药物过量供应的患病率及预测因素。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究。将电子健康记录数据与2006 - 2008年医疗保险和当地一家私人支付方的医疗及药房报销数据以及参保数据相链接,为该医师团队管理的患者构建一个患者季度数据集。使用ReComp计算患者的季度续方依从性,ReComp是一种连续的多间隔药物获取量(CMA)测量方法,并将其分类为<0.80 =供应不足,0.80 - 1.20 =供应适当,>1.20 =供应过量。我们使用多项逻辑回归分析基线和随时间变化的易患因素、促成因素和医疗需求因素与季度供应之间的关联。

结果

样本包括2519名成年糖尿病患者。与私人保险患者相比,医疗保险中年龄<65岁的患者(OR = 3.36,95% CI = 1.61 - 6.99)、医疗保险中65岁及以上的患者(OR = 2.51,95% CI = 1.37 - 4.60)、医疗保险/医疗补助中年龄<65岁的患者(OR = 4.55,95% CI = 2.33 - 8.92)以及医疗保险/医疗补助中65岁及以上的患者(OR = 5.73,95% CI = 2.89 - 11.33)出现过量供应的几率更高。与过量供应几率较高相关的其他因素包括该季度有任何90天的续方、精神病诊断以及血糖控制为中度而非严格控制。

结论

与之前对综合系统的研究相比,过量供应的情况不太普遍,但医疗保险D部分的参保者比私人保险个体出现过量供应的几率更高。未来的研究应考察医疗保险D部分与可能影响过量供应的私人健康保险计划的使用管理做法。

相似文献

1
Medication oversupply in patients with diabetes.糖尿病患者用药过量
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015 May-Jun;11(3):382-400. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
2
Association between dispensing channel and medication adherence among medicare beneficiaries taking medications to treat diabetes, high blood pressure, or high blood cholesterol.医疗保险受益人群在服用治疗糖尿病、高血压或高胆固醇药物时,配药渠道与用药依从性之间的关联。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Aug;20(8):851-61. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.8.851.
3
Effect of Dual Use of Veterans Affairs and Medicare Part D Drug Benefits on Antihypertensive Medication Supply in a National Cohort of Veterans with Dementia.退伍军人事务部和医疗保险处方药福利的双重利用对全国痴呆退伍军人队列中抗高血压药物供应的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec;53 Suppl 3(Suppl Suppl 3):5375-5401. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13055. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
4
A Multichannel Medication Adherence Intervention Influences Patient and Prescriber Behavior.多通道药物依从性干预影响患者和处方行为。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 May;22(5):526-38. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.5.526.
5
Medication Nonadherence Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Comorbid Chronic Conditions: Influence of Pharmacy Dispensing Channel.医疗保险受益人与共病慢性病患者的药物不依从性:药房配药渠道的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 May;22(5):550-60. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.5.550.
6
Descriptive analysis of mail interventions with physicians and patients to improve adherence with antihypertensive and antidiabetic medications in a mixed-model managed care organization of commercial and Medicare members.在一个由商业保险和医疗保险成员组成的混合模式管理式医疗组织中,对针对医生和患者的邮件干预措施进行描述性分析,以提高抗高血压和抗糖尿病药物的依从性。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Jun;17(5):355-66. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.5.355.
7
Medication acquisition and self-reported adherence in veterans with hypertension.高血压退伍军人的药物获取与自我报告的依从性
Med Care. 2009 Apr;47(4):474-81. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0b013e31818e7d4d.
8
The Influence of a Community Pharmacy Automatic Prescription Refill Program on Medicare Part D Adherence Metrics.社区药房自动处方续方计划对医疗保险处方药依从性指标的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Jul;22(7):801-7. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.7.801.
9
Association of refill adherence and health care use among adults with hypertension in an urban health care system.城市医疗系统中成年高血压患者的续方依从性与医疗服务利用情况的关联
Pharmacotherapy. 2006 Jun;26(6):779-89. doi: 10.1592/phco.26.6.779.
10
Geographic variation in medication adherence in commercial and Medicare part D populations.商业保险和医疗保险处方药部分人群用药依从性的地域差异。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Aug;20(8):834-42. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.8.834.

引用本文的文献

1
Costs of Prescription Drugs for Children and Parental Adherence to Long-Term Medications.儿童处方药费用与家长对长期用药的依从性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2337971. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.37971.
2
Measuring the multiple domains of medication nonadherence: findings from a Delphi survey of adherence experts.测量药物不依从的多个领域:一项对依从性专家的德尔菲调查结果。
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Feb 11;11(1):104-113. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz133.
3
Oral antidiabetic medication adherence and glycaemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional retrospective study in a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia.

本文引用的文献

1
Medication days' supply, adherence, wastage, and cost among chronic patients in Medicaid.医疗补助计划中慢性病患者的药物供应天数、依从性、浪费情况及费用
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2012 Sep 19;2(3). doi: 10.5600/mmrr.002.03.a04. eCollection 2012.
2
Continuity of antipsychotic medication management for Medicaid patients with schizophrenia.为患有精神分裂症的医疗补助计划患者提供抗精神病药物管理的连续性。
Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Jul;62(7):747-52. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.7.pss6207_0747.
3
Effect of patient selection method on provider group performance estimates.
口服抗糖尿病药物的依从性和 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制:在沙特阿拉伯一家三级医院进行的横断面回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 23;9(7):e029280. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029280.
4
Effect of Dual Use of Veterans Affairs and Medicare Part D Drug Benefits on Antihypertensive Medication Supply in a National Cohort of Veterans with Dementia.退伍军人事务部和医疗保险处方药福利的双重利用对全国痴呆退伍军人队列中抗高血压药物供应的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec;53 Suppl 3(Suppl Suppl 3):5375-5401. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13055. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
5
Evaluation of the chronic disease management program for appropriateness of medication adherence and persistence in hypertension and type-2 diabetes patients in Korea.韩国高血压和2型糖尿病患者慢性病管理项目中药物依从性和持续性适宜性的评估
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Apr;96(14):e6577. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006577.
6
Medication Nonadherence: The Role of Cost, Community, and Individual Factors.药物治疗不依从性:成本、社区和个体因素的作用。
Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug;52(4):1511-1533. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12547. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
7
Approaches to Supporting the Analysis of Historical Medication Datasets with RxNorm.使用RxNorm支持历史用药数据集分析的方法。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015 Nov 5;2015:1034-41. eCollection 2015.
患者选择方法对提供者组绩效评估的影响。
Med Care. 2011 Aug;49(8):780-5. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31821b3604.
4
Increasing time costs and copayments for prescription drugs: an analysis of policy changes in a complex environment.提高处方药的时间成本和共付额:复杂环境下的政策变化分析。
Health Serv Res. 2011 Jun;46(3):900-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01237.x. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
5
The theoretical basis for practice-relevant medication use research: patient-centered/behavioral theories.实践相关药物使用研究的理论基础:以患者为中心/行为理论。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2011 Dec;7(4):317-29. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.11.001. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
6
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2010.《糖尿病医疗护理标准——2010》
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-61. doi: 10.2337/dc10-S011.
7
Measuring concurrent adherence to multiple related medications.同时测量多种相关药物的依从性。
Am J Manag Care. 2009 Jul;15(7):457-64.
8
Medication acquisition and self-reported adherence in veterans with hypertension.高血压退伍军人的药物获取与自我报告的依从性
Med Care. 2009 Apr;47(4):474-81. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0b013e31818e7d4d.
9
Contrasting measures of adherence with simple drug use, medication switching, and therapeutic duplication.对比药物使用、药物转换和治疗药物重复的依从性测量方法。
Ann Pharmacother. 2009 Jan;43(1):36-44. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K671. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
10
Medicare physician group practice demonstration design: quality and efficiency pay-for-performance.医疗保险医师团体执业示范项目设计:基于质量和效率的绩效薪酬
Health Care Financ Rev. 2007 Fall;29(1):15-29.