Barlogie Bart, Mitchell Alan, van Rhee Frits, Epstein Joshua, Morgan Gareth J, Crowley John
Myeloma Institute for Research and Therapy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR; and.
Cancer Research And Biostatistics, Seattle, WA.
Blood. 2014 Nov 13;124(20):3043-51. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-07-552059. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
Does the dogma that multiple myeloma is incurable still hold?. The genomic chaos and resulting resistance to apoptosis of myeloma, long considered an obstacle to cure, formed the basis of Total Therapy (TT) program. The TT approach uses all myeloma-active drugs upfront to target drug-resistant subclones during initial treatment to prevent later relapse. Long-term follow-up of 1202 patients (TT1: n = 231, median follow-up: 21 years; TT2: 668, median follow-up: 12 years; TT3a: n = 303, median follow-up: 9 years) permitted investigation of whether progression-free survival (PFS) and complete response (CR) duration were consistent with curability, ie observation of plateaus in Kaplan-Meier plots for PFS and CR duration. In the subset of 627 patients with plasma cell gene expression profiling data, cure plateaus were apparent at 5 years in the 14% with high-risk myeloma compared with 10 years in the remainder with low-risk disease. A parametric model based on PFS and CR duration supported an increase in curability: 10-year PFS and CR estimates increased from 8.8%/17.9% in TT1 to 15.5%/28.2% in TT2's control arm to 25.1%/35.6% in TT2's thalidomide arm and to 32.9%/48.8% in TT3a. Toward developing novel therapies, we recommend a concerted focus on patients with high-risk myeloma whose outcome has not been advanced.
多发性骨髓瘤不可治愈这一教条是否仍然成立?骨髓瘤的基因组紊乱以及由此产生的对细胞凋亡的抗性,长期以来被认为是治愈的障碍,构成了全程治疗(TT)方案的基础。TT方法在初始治疗期间使用所有对骨髓瘤有效的药物,以靶向耐药亚克隆,防止后期复发。对1202例患者进行长期随访(TT1:n = 231,中位随访时间:21年;TT2:668例,中位随访时间:12年;TT3a:n = 303,中位随访时间:9年),从而能够研究无进展生存期(PFS)和完全缓解(CR)持续时间是否与可治愈性一致,即观察PFS和CR持续时间的Kaplan-Meier曲线中的平台期。在627例有浆细胞基因表达谱数据的患者亚组中,高危骨髓瘤患者中有14%在5年时出现治愈平台期,而低危疾病的其余患者在10年时出现。基于PFS和CR持续时间的参数模型支持可治愈性的提高:10年PFS和CR估计值从TT1中的8.8%/17.9%增加到TT2对照组中的15.5%/28.2%,再到TT2沙利度胺组中的25.1%/35.6%,以及TT3a中的32.9%/48.8%。为了开发新的治疗方法,我们建议共同关注高危骨髓瘤患者,他们的治疗效果尚未得到改善。