Prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders and validation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale as a screening tool in axial spondyloarthritis patients.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of anxiety and depression in axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients by a psychiatrist using the Chinese-bilingual Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition patient research version (CB-SCID-I/P), and to examine the effectiveness of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) as a screening tool.

METHODS

We recruited 160 Chinese axial-SpA patients to determine the prevalence of anxiety and depression using the CB-SCID-I/P. Recruited subjects were asked to complete the HADS. HADS, HADS-depression (HADS-D) subscale and HADS-anxiety (HADS-A) subscale were analyzed to determine their effectiveness in screening for depressive and anxiety disorders.

RESULTS

The prevalence of current major depressive disorder (MDD) and anxiety disorder were 10.6% and 15.6%, respectively. The full-scale HADS outperformed the HADS-D subscale in screening for current MDD (area under the curve [AUC] 0.889; 0.844) and all depressive disorders (AUC 0.885; 0.862) while the HADS-A subscale outperformed the full scale HADS in screening for anxiety disorders (AUC 0.894; 0.846). The optimal cut-off point of the full scale HADS for screening current MDD and all depressive disorders were 7/8 and 6/7, yielding a sensitivity of 82.4% and 83.9%, specificity of 78.7% and 74.8%, respectively. The optimal cut-off point of HADS-A subscale for screening anxiety disorders was 6/7, yielding a sensitivity of 88.0% and specificity of 74.4%.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of MDD and anxiety disorder in SpA patients were 10.6% and 15.6%, respectively. We recommend using the full-scale HADS in screening for depressive disorders and HADS-A subscale for anxiety disorders.