Durlik M, Benichoux R, Mainard D, Merle M
Institut de Recherches Chirurgicales, C.H.U. de Brabois, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France.
Microsurgery. 1989;10(3):170-4. doi: 10.1002/micr.1920100305.
To find the optimal means for monitoring the vascularity of a cutaneous free flap in the postoperative period, we have experimentally compared laser-Doppler velocimetry and fluorometry. Using the rat groin model, five groups were evaluated: 1. flap isolation without division of the pedicle vessels (island flap); 2) flap isolation, division, and repair of the pedicle artery and vein (free flap); 3) flap isolation, with ligation of the pedicle artery immediately or 1 hour later; 4) flap isolation, with ligation of the pedicle vein immediately or 1 hour later; 5) flap isolation, with ligation of the pedicle artery and vein immediately or 1 hour later. The laser-Doppler processes the signal by combination of the root mean square and differential amplification. The fluoroscan gives an index in relation to the fluorescence of a control area. The results obtained with both methods correlated well with findings in clinical situations. However, the laser-Doppler readings were more rapid and sensitive than those with fluorometry. We suggest that laser-Doppler velocimetry is a superior means of monitoring the vascular status of a free tissue transfer or digital replant.
为了找到术后监测游离皮瓣血管化的最佳方法,我们对激光多普勒测速法和荧光测定法进行了实验比较。利用大鼠腹股沟模型,评估了五组情况:1. 皮瓣分离但不切断蒂血管(岛状皮瓣);2)皮瓣分离、切断并修复蒂动脉和静脉(游离皮瓣);3)皮瓣分离,立即或1小时后结扎蒂动脉;4)皮瓣分离,立即或1小时后结扎蒂静脉;5)皮瓣分离,立即或1小时后结扎蒂动脉和静脉。激光多普勒通过均方根和差分放大相结合来处理信号。荧光扫描给出与对照区域荧光相关的指数。两种方法获得的结果与临床情况中的发现相关性良好。然而,激光多普勒读数比荧光测定法更快速、更灵敏。我们认为激光多普勒测速法是监测游离组织移植或断指再植血管状态的更佳方法。