Albertini M, Politano S, Berard E, Boutte P, Mariani R
Clinique Médicale Infantile, Hôpital de Cimiez, Nice, France.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 1989;7(3):140-4. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950070305.
Peak expiratory flow (PEF) variation was measured in 18 healthy children (Group I) aged 9.25 to 13.3 years (mean, 11 years) and in 17 asymptomatic asthmatic children (Group II) aged 8.75 to 14.25 years (mean, 11.9 years) receiving no bronchodilators. PEF was measured four times a day for a period of 10-14 days. There were no differences between Group I and Group II regarding age, height, weight, sex, duration of the study, and overall mean PEF values. Mean daily PEF variation amplitude (difference between the highest and the lowest daily values as a percent of the mean) was significantly higher in Group II than in Group I subjects (15.2 vs. 9.9%), and so was cosinor amplitude (9.6 vs. 5.9%). Significant circadian rhythm in PEF was detected by cosinor analysis in nine subjects of Group I and in eight subjects of Group II. Mean PEF bathyphase calculated by cosinor analysis (trough time in a 24 h scale) was similar in the two groups (0503 h, in Group I and 0434 h in Group II). The results of this study show that the amplitude of circadian variation in PEF tends to be higher in asymptomatic asthmatic children than in normal children, but there is too much overlap to use PEF monitoring to identify an individual asymptomatic asthmatic child. Therefore, diurnal variation of PEF is not suitable for diagnosing mild asthmatics.
对18名年龄在9.25至13.3岁(平均11岁)的健康儿童(第一组)和17名年龄在8.75至14.25岁(平均11.9岁)且未使用支气管扩张剂的无症状哮喘儿童(第二组)测量了呼气峰值流速(PEF)变化。在10 - 14天的时间里,每天测量4次PEF。第一组和第二组在年龄、身高、体重、性别、研究持续时间以及总体平均PEF值方面没有差异。第二组的平均每日PEF变化幅度(最高和最低每日值之差占平均值的百分比)显著高于第一组受试者(15.2%对9.9%),余弦分析得出的振幅也是如此(9.6对5.9)。通过余弦分析在第一组的9名受试者和第二组的8名受试者中检测到PEF存在显著的昼夜节律。通过余弦分析计算得出的两组平均PEF低谷期(24小时尺度上的低谷时间)相似(第一组为05:03,第二组为04:34)。本研究结果表明,无症状哮喘儿童的PEF昼夜变化幅度往往高于正常儿童,但重叠过多,无法使用PEF监测来识别个体无症状哮喘儿童。因此,PEF的昼夜变化不适合用于诊断轻度哮喘患者。