Corrie Heather, Brooke-Wavell Katherine, Mansfield Neil J, Cowley Alison, Morris Robert, Masud Tahir
School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
Design School, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
Age Ageing. 2015 Jan;44(1):115-22. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu136. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
whole-body vibration training may improve neuromuscular function, falls risk and bone density, but previous studies have had conflicting findings.
this study aimed to evaluate the influence of vertical vibration (VV) and side-alternating vibration (SV) on musculoskeletal health in older people at risk of falls.
single-blind, randomised, controlled trial comparing vibration training to sham vibration (Sham) in addition to usual care.
participants were 61 older people (37 women and 24 men), aged 80.2 + 6.5 years, referred to an outpatient falls prevention service.
participants were randomly assigned to VV, SV or Sham in addition to the usual falls prevention programme. Participants were requested to attend three vibration sessions per week for 12 weeks, with sessions increasing to six, 1 min bouts of vibration. Falls risk factors and neuromuscular tests were assessed, and blood samples collected for determination of bone turnover, at baseline and following the intervention.
chair stand time, timed-up-and-go time, fear of falling, NEADL index and postural sway with eyes open improved in the Sham group. There were significantly greater gains in leg power in the VV than in the Sham group and in bone formation in SV and VV compared with the Sham group. Conversely, body sway improved less in the VV than in the Sham group. Changes in falls risk factors did not differ between the groups.
whole-body vibration increased leg power and bone formation, but it did not provide any additional benefits to balance or fall risk factors beyond a falls prevention programme in older people at risk of falls.
全身振动训练可能改善神经肌肉功能、降低跌倒风险并提高骨密度,但先前的研究结果相互矛盾。
本研究旨在评估垂直振动(VV)和侧向交替振动(SV)对有跌倒风险的老年人肌肉骨骼健康的影响。
单盲、随机、对照试验,除常规护理外,将振动训练与假振动(Sham)进行比较。
61名老年人(37名女性和24名男性),年龄80.2±6.5岁,被转诊至门诊跌倒预防服务机构。
参与者除接受常规跌倒预防计划外,被随机分配至VV、SV或Sham组。要求参与者每周参加三次振动训练课程,共12周,每次课程增加至六次,每次振动1分钟。在基线和干预后评估跌倒风险因素和神经肌肉测试,并采集血样以测定骨转换。
Sham组的椅子站立时间、定时起立行走时间、跌倒恐惧、NEADL指数和睁眼时的姿势摆动得到改善。与Sham组相比,VV组的腿部力量增加显著更大,SV组和VV组的骨形成与Sham组相比显著增加。相反,VV组的身体摆动改善程度低于Sham组。各组之间跌倒风险因素的变化无差异。
全身振动增加了腿部力量和骨形成,但对于有跌倒风险的老年人,除了跌倒预防计划外,它并未为平衡或跌倒风险因素带来任何额外益处。