Krüger Jan-Christopher, Meves Saskia H, Kara Kaffer, Mügge Andreas, Neubauer Horst
Cardiovascular Center.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2014 Oct;74(7):568-74. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2014.913305.
Several platelet function test systems exist for the evaluation of the platelet inhibitory effect in patients on P2Y12 inhibitors and/or acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, aspirin) therapy. Studies comparing different available assays found only a poor correlation. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the correlation and agreement between single electrode (SEA) and multiple electrode (MEA) aggregometry.
In whole blood arachidonic acid (AA) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation was measured simultaneously using SEA (Chrono-Log) and MEA (Multiplate). We analyzed a total of 226 measurements taken from 58 patients on single ASA therapy or dual antiplatelet therapy with ASA and a thienopyridine. A cut-off value for clopidogrel/prasugrel high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) of > 47 units (U) was chosen for MEA testing using hirudin and > 5 Ohm for SEA with citrate anticoagulated blood samples. The respective cut-off values for ASA HPR were > 30 U for the MEA assay and > 1 Ohm for SEA testing. There was a good correlation of the prevalence of thienopyridine-HPR in both whole blood assays (Spearman rank correlation coefficient r = 0.698) and a good inter-rate accordance (Cohen's Kappa statistic κ = 0.648). For AA-induced aggregation, the correlation of the results obtained was significant (r = 0.536; p < 0.001) and detecting ASA-HPR revealed a moderate (κ = 0.482) correlation between both impedance aggregometry assays.
Platelet function testing using SEA and MEA provided both good accordance and correlation and therefore study results obtained by these two assays similarly enabled the detection of HPR of thienopyridine (and ASA) therapy.
存在多种血小板功能检测系统,用于评估接受P2Y12抑制剂和/或乙酰水杨酸(ASA,阿司匹林)治疗的患者的血小板抑制作用。比较不同现有检测方法的研究发现相关性较差。本研究的目的是评估单电极(SEA)和多电极(MEA)凝集测定法之间的相关性和一致性。
使用SEA(Chrono-Log)和MEA(Multiplate)同时测量全血中花生四烯酸(AA)和二磷酸腺苷(ADP)诱导的血小板聚集。我们分析了58例接受单一ASA治疗或ASA与噻吩并吡啶双重抗血小板治疗的患者的总共226次测量结果。使用水蛭素进行MEA检测时,氯吡格雷/普拉格雷高治疗期血小板反应性(HPR)的临界值选择为>47单位(U),使用柠檬酸盐抗凝血液样本进行SEA检测时为>5欧姆。ASA HPR的相应临界值在MEA检测中为>30 U,在SEA检测中为>1欧姆。两种全血检测中噻吩并吡啶-HPR的患病率具有良好相关性(Spearman等级相关系数r = 0.698),且检测率一致性良好(Cohen's Kappa统计量κ = 0.648)。对于AA诱导的聚集,所得结果具有显著相关性(r = 0.536;p < 0.001),并且检测ASA-HPR显示两种阻抗凝集测定法之间具有中等相关性(κ = 0.482)。
使用SEA和MEA进行血小板功能检测具有良好的一致性和相关性,因此通过这两种检测方法获得的研究结果同样能够检测噻吩并吡啶(和ASA)治疗的HPR。