• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

物理治疗主导的关节置换复查门诊:初步结果分析

Physiotherapy-led arthroplasty review clinic: a preliminary outcomes analysis.

作者信息

Large Kate E, Page Carolyn J, Brock Kim, Dowsey Michelle M, Choong Peter F M

机构信息

Physiotherapy Department, St Vincent's Hospital, PO Box 2900, Fitzroy, Vic. 3065, Australia. Email: ;

Department of Orthopaedics, St Vincent's Hospital, PO Box 2900, Fitzroy, Vic. 3065, Australia. Email: ;

出版信息

Aust Health Rev. 2014 Nov;38(5):510-6. doi: 10.1071/AH13238.

DOI:10.1071/AH13238
PMID:25297119
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

With the rising demand for Orthopaedics in the healthcare sector, service delivery innovations need to be explored to accommodate the increasing workload. Senior Musculoskeletal Physiotherapists have the specialised skills in the assessment of musculoskeletal conditions to determine the impact of surgery on patient outcomes. The aim of the present study was to compare outcomes between a physiotherapy-led arthroplasty review clinic (PT clinic) and the traditional model of orthopaedic surgeon review (OS clinic) after hip and knee replacement.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective case-controlled audit using a comprehensive database. Twenty-four patients who had a hip arthroplasty and 52 patients who had a knee arthroplasty were reviewed solely by the PT clinic at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgical reviews. These patients were matched 1:2 against patients seen only by the OS clinic. The outcome measures included International Knee Score (IKS), Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Short Form (SF)-12.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in HHS or SF-12 scores for patients after hip arthroplasty. Significant differences for knee arthroplasty were observed favouring the PT clinic; IKS, PT clinic 147.6 (37.07), OS clinic 135.4 (35.68), P≤0.01, and physical component of the SF-12, PT clinic 41.98 (10.45), OS clinic 37.20 (10.44), P<0.01.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of a physiotherapy-led arthroplasty review clinic appears to be a safe and effective service alternative to reviews conducted by orthopaedic surgeons. WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT THE TOPIC?: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of musculoskeletal pain and disability and the burden of the disease is rapidly increasing. Joint arthroplasty surgery is the mainstay of treatment for people with end-stage OA; it is a high-cost, high-volume procedure that dominates surgical wait lists around Australia. Long-term follow up is encouraged by the Arthroplasty Society of Australia and endorsed by the Australian Orthopaedics Association, but it is acknowledged that it is impossible to achieve this with solely orthopaedic surgeon reviews, an issue that is only going to worsen with the increased demand for surgery. Physiotherapists have become involved in many advanced scope roles within public health care, and emerging research suggests that patients are highly satisfied with their care in these types of clinics. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER ADD?: Although it has been shown that patients are satisfied in physiotherapy-led advanced clinics, there is a paucity of evidence in the outcomes of patients attending these clinics. Implementation of a physiotherapy-led arthroplasty review clinic demonstrated that outcome measures in this patient cohort were not compromised and, following knee joint arthroplasty, may even be improved. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTITIONERS?: The findings of this study indicate that joint review clinics involving physiotherapists acting in an advanced scope role are unlikely to compromise patient outcomes. The use of this role substitution on a broader scale can be recommended.

摘要

目的

随着医疗保健领域对骨科服务需求的不断增加,需要探索服务提供创新方式以应对日益增加的工作量。高级肌肉骨骼物理治疗师具备评估肌肉骨骼疾病的专业技能,能够确定手术对患者预后的影响。本研究旨在比较物理治疗主导的关节置换术后复查诊所(PT诊所)与传统骨科医生复查模式(OS诊所)在髋关节和膝关节置换术后的预后情况。

方法

本研究是一项回顾性病例对照审计,使用了一个综合数据库。24例接受髋关节置换术的患者和52例接受膝关节置换术的患者在术后3个月、6个月和12个月仅由PT诊所进行复查。这些患者与仅由OS诊所诊治的患者按1:2进行匹配。结局指标包括国际膝关节评分(IKS)、哈里斯髋关节评分(HHS)和简短健康调查问卷(SF-12)。

结果

髋关节置换术后患者的HHS或SF-12评分无显著差异。膝关节置换术后观察到有利于PT诊所的显著差异;IKS,PT诊所147.6(37.07),OS诊所135.4(35.68),P≤0.01;SF-12的身体成分评分,PT诊所41.98(10.45),OS诊所37.20(10.44),P<0.01。

结论

实施物理治疗主导的关节置换术后复查诊所似乎是一种安全有效的服务方式,可替代骨科医生进行的复查。关于该主题已知的情况是什么?:骨关节炎(OA)是肌肉骨骼疼痛和残疾的主要原因,且该疾病的负担正在迅速增加。关节置换手术是终末期OA患者的主要治疗方法;这是一种高成本、高工作量的手术,在澳大利亚各地的手术等候名单中占主导地位。澳大利亚关节置换协会鼓励进行长期随访,并得到澳大利亚骨科协会的认可,但人们认识到仅靠骨科医生复查无法实现这一点,而且随着手术需求的增加,这个问题只会变得更糟。物理治疗师已参与到公共医疗保健中的许多高级职责范围内,并且新出现的研究表明患者对这类诊所的护理非常满意。本文补充了什么内容?:尽管已表明患者对物理治疗主导的高级诊所感到满意,但关于这些诊所患者预后的证据却很少。实施物理治疗主导的关节置换术后复查诊所表明,该患者队列的结局指标并未受到影响,而且在膝关节置换术后甚至可能得到改善。对从业者有什么启示?:本研究结果表明,由物理治疗师担任高级职责的联合复查诊所不太可能影响患者预后。可以推荐在更广泛范围内采用这种职责替代方式。

相似文献

1
Physiotherapy-led arthroplasty review clinic: a preliminary outcomes analysis.物理治疗主导的关节置换复查门诊:初步结果分析
Aust Health Rev. 2014 Nov;38(5):510-6. doi: 10.1071/AH13238.
2
Advanced musculoskeletal physiotherapists in post arthroplasty review clinics: a state wide implementation program evaluation.关节置换术后复查门诊中高级运动医学物理治疗师:全州实施计划评估。
Physiotherapy. 2018 Mar;104(1):98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
3
Patient satisfaction with physiotherapists is not inferior to surgeons in an arthroplasty review clinic: non-inferiority study of an expanded scope model of care.患者对物理治疗师的满意度在关节置换随访诊所并不亚于外科医生:一种扩大护理范围模式的非劣效性研究。
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Feb;45(1):104-109. doi: 10.1071/AH19217.
4
Comparative outcomes and cost-utility following surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: part 2--estimated lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios.与髋或膝关节骨关节炎相比,手术治疗局限性腰椎椎管狭窄症的比较结果和成本效用:第 2 部分——估计终生增量成本效用比。
Spine J. 2014 Feb 1;14(2):244-54. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.011. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
5
Assessment of health-related quality of life after surgical treatment of focal symptomatic spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.与髋或膝关节骨关节炎相比,局灶性症状性脊柱狭窄手术治疗后健康相关生活质量的评估。
Spine J. 2008 Mar-Apr;8(2):296-304. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.05.003. Epub 2007 Jun 18.
6
Results of total joint arthroplasty and joint preserving surgery in younger patients evaluated by alternative outcome measures.采用替代结局指标评估年轻患者全关节置换术和保关节手术的结果。
Dan Med J. 2014 Apr;61(4):B4836.
7
The access randomized clinical trial of public versus private physiotherapy for low back pain.公共与私人物理治疗低腰痛的随机临床试验。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jan 15;37(2):85-96. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182127457.
8
The Joint Clinic: Managing Excess Demand for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Referrals Using a New Physiotherapy-Led Outpatient Service.联合诊所:利用新的物理治疗师主导的门诊服务管理髋关节和膝关节骨关节炎转介的过度需求。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Apr;33(4):983-987. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.034. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
9
Group physiotherapy provides similar outcomes for participants after joint replacement surgery as 1-to-1 physiotherapy: a sequential cohort study.小组物理治疗与一对一物理治疗为关节置换术后参与者带来的效果相似:一项序贯队列研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Oct;90(10):1727-33. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.04.019.
10
Nurse-led orthopaedic clinic in total joint replacement.由护士主导的全关节置换骨科诊所。
Hong Kong Med J. 2014 Dec;20(6):511-8. doi: 10.12809/hkmj134150. Epub 2014 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing Changing Healthcare Needs: A Realist-Inspired Review of Innovative Rehabilitation Care Models.应对不断变化的医疗保健需求:对创新康复护理模式的现实主义启发式综述
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Jun;31(4):e70144. doi: 10.1111/jep.70144.
2
Reorganizing outpatient spine services increased efficiency and patient satisfaction.重组门诊脊柱服务提高了效率和患者满意度。
Brain Spine. 2025 Mar 26;5:104245. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104245. eCollection 2025.
3
Identifying complications requiring re-operation following primary hip or knee arthroplasty: a consecutive series of 98 patients.
确定初次髋关节或膝关节置换术后需要再次手术的并发症:98例连续病例系列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Mar 27;19(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2005-y.